Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Striiikoza

@strikoza

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,288subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965240135
TypeChannel
Username@strikoza
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/strikoza

Growth

1,2881,2971,292.57 August 2026 — 1,297 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,297 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,296 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,293 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,288 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,287–1,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:341,288-5
11 Aug 2026, 08:021,293-3
8 Aug 2026, 09:341,296-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:331,297no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:391,297first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.9%
avg views ÷ 1,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
849
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (1 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total12,741
Reactions total373
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

373 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17246.1%
🔥8923.9%
😍4612.3%
🤷‍♀277.24%
💯61.61%
😢61.61%
❤‍🔥51.34%
👍51.34%
💘51.34%
🤩41.07%
🙉20.536%
🤝20.536%
🌚10.268%
🐳10.268%
😴10.268%
🙏10.268%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
152
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
150
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @strikoza. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC607 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не понимаю мне идет или нет

19😍8🤷‍♀3😢2

7 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC607 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥20🤷‍♀15💯6

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC763 views42 reactions150 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😍2712🔥2🤷‍♀1

6 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC771 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну , я долго не думала , как вы понимаете)

🔥24😍11🤩42

4 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC887 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Девчонки! Может кто-то знает мастеров перманента, которые исправляют старые работы и делают новые красивенькие)? По типу таких

4 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC889 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Помогите через гпт сделать окрашивание «контуринг» 🤣🙏

4 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC828 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @budnitanchika

Может у кого-то знакомые сдают однушку в Минске? Напишите в лс или комментарии

4 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC904 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16🤷‍♀4😢4🔥1😴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @strikoza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Striiikoza” (@strikoza), 1,288 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strikoza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.