Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Страховка НЕ готова

Channel

Страховка НЕ готова

@strahovkanegotova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,416subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001988069502
TypeChannel
Username@strahovkanegotova
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/strahovkanegotova

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4121,4201,4167 August 2026 — 1,416 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,416 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,420 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,418 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,412 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,414 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,416 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,415 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,416 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 43 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,411–1,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:361,416+1
15 Sept 2026, 14:191,415-1
11 Sept 2026, 22:001,416+2
2 Sept 2026, 17:231,414+2
31 Aug 2026, 00:271,412-1
27 Aug 2026, 19:131,413-5
20 Aug 2026, 19:221,418-2
17 Aug 2026, 21:521,420+4
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,416no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:051,416first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

310 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13944.8%
🔥9029.0%
🏆4715.2%
👍144.52%
👀134.19%
👌72.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC921 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Карты длинных групп 5 класса КК2026. Оригиналы здесь.

23🔥10👀7🏆2👌2

12 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC905 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Карты длинных личек 5 класса КК2026. Оригиналы здесь.

15🔥9👍4

6 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,240 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кубок России по спортивному туризму на пешеходных дистанциях (г. Пенза, Пензенская область). 03-06.07.2026 Командный зачёт среди субъектов РФ. 1. 🥇 Республика Марий Эл 🏳 - 2279 баллов (связка короткая: 591 + личка короткая: 565 + личка длинная: 483 + группа длинная: 640) 2. 🥈 Белгородская область 🏳 - 2053 (515+445+453+640) 3. 🥉 Санкт-Петербург 🏳 - 1994 (399+406+529+660) 4. Чувашская Республика 🏳 - 1

🔥235

6 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,040 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кубок России по спортивному туризму на пешеходных дистанциях (г. Пенза, Пензенская область). 04-05.07.2026 Дистанция-пешеходная, 5 класс. Сумма двух дистанций. Мужчины 1. 🥇 Урдяков Рустам 🏳 - 199 баллов (короткая: 99 + длинная: 100) 2. 🥈 Рожков Константин 🏳 - 190 (94+96) 3. 🥉 Дмитриев Игорь 🏳 - 160 (68+92) 4. Безносиков Владислав 🏳 - 155 (89+66) 5. Кузнецов Сергей 🏳 - 154 (82+72) 6. Демьянов Вя

🔥53🏆2

6 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,590 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кубок России по спортивному туризму на пешеходных дистанциях (г. Пенза, Пензенская область). 06.07.2026 Дистанция-пешеходная-группа (длинная), 5 класс. Мужчины 1. 🥇 Демьянов Вячеслав, Урдяков Рустам, Дмитриев Георгий, Дмитриев Игорь 🏳 - 2:07:33 2. 🥈 +02:53 - Иванов Илья, Кузнецов Сергей, Семенов Константин, Львов Андрей 🏳 3. 🥉 +06:19 - Федин Михаил, Пешиков Сергей, Лапин Степан, Калиновский Леонид 🏳

9🏆5👌1

5 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC790 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто победит на длинной пешеходной группе КК2026 у женщин?

  1. Лизунова-Калиновская-Архарова-Пешикова (10:33)6%
  2. Пшестанчик-Огрызкова-Стрельникова-Денисова (10:37)5%
  3. Смирнова-Николаева-Лыжина-Дмитриева (10:41)7%
  4. Чеботарева-Елисеева-Иващенко-Орлова (10:45)51%
  5. Алексеева-Карпова-Жаркова-Лекомцева (10:49)8%
  6. Тимофеева-Ворожейкина-Филина-Дьячкова (10:53)7%
  7. Межевич-Сухарева-Баум-Комкова (10:57)2%
  8. Маркова-Кушигина-Белан-Веденяпина (11:01)4%
  9. Пермякова-Магомедгаджиева-Струкова-Лебедева (11:05)11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7🏆4👍1

5 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC722 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто победит на длинной пешеходной группе КК2026 у мужчин?

  1. Самолетов-Безносиков-Белявцев-Ушаков (10:31)14%
  2. Шапаренко-Губанов-Колесов-Шапаренко (10:35)4%
  3. Федин-Пешиков-Лапин-Калиновский (10:39)8%
  4. Демьянов-Урдяков-Дмитриев-Дмитриев (10:43)47%
  5. Жильцов-Ющик-Волошкин-Кудряшов (10:47)6%
  6. Иванов-Кузнецов-Семенов-Львов (10:51)8%
  7. Галлямов-Хуснутдинов-Кулешов-Сухарев (10:55)1%
  8. Глухов-Чурилин-Шипица-Гришкин (10:59)1%
  9. Мухаметшин-Бикушев-Гизатулин-Тутунин (11:03)2%
  10. Прядохин-Струков-Дзык-Квасков (11:07)8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🏆41👍1

5 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC704 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня 6 июля на КК длинная группа. На 5 классе длина дистанции у жучин составит 12.5 км с набором высоты 150 метров. На дистанции расположено 9 технических точек и 13 КП. У женщин - 9.4 км с набором высоты 65 метров, 8 технических точек, 8 КП. Формат карты у мужчин и женщин тоже немного отличается. У женщин - это односторонний А3 масштабом 1:10000 и сечением 2.5 м. У мужчин карта двусторонняя, формата А3. На одн

13🔥4

5 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC815 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По длинной личке. • На новой местности проявилось немало ошибок у спортсменов именно в ориентировании. Есть мнение, что на полигоне в Цюрупах расклад мог быть другим. • Решающий навык на этой дистанции - азимутальный ход. Дорожные варианты были, но с очень большими оббегами. Как и были скоростные дорожные перегоны. • Погода была беговой. Первые стартовавшие застали ливневой дождь, который сделал весь лес оче

🔥267👍2

5 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,610 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кубок России по спортивному туризму на пешеходных дистанциях (г. Пенза, Пензенская область). 05.07.2026 Дистанция-пешеходная (длинная), 5 класс. Мужчины 1. 🥇 Урдяков Рустам 🏳 - 1:15:44 2. 🥈 +00:51 - Рожков Константин 🏳 3. 🥉 +01:38 - Дмитриев Игорь 🏳 4. +01:45 - Пешиков Сергей 🏳 5. +05:10 - Львов Андрей 🏳 6. +05:24 - Квасков Дмитрий 🏳 Женщины 1. 🥇 Лебедева Наталья 🏳 - 1:18:03 2. 🥈 +00:53

17🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @strahovkanegotova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTCAnonymous Poll198 voters

Кто победит на длинной пешеходной группе КК2026 у женщин?

  1. Лизунова-Калиновская-Архарова-Пешикова (10:33)6%
  2. Пшестанчик-Огрызкова-Стрельникова-Денисова (10:37)5%
  3. Смирнова-Николаева-Лыжина-Дмитриева (10:41)7%
  4. Чеботарева-Елисеева-Иващенко-Орлова (10:45)51%
  5. Алексеева-Карпова-Жаркова-Лекомцева (10:49)8%
  6. Тимофеева-Ворожейкина-Филина-Дьячкова (10:53)7%
  7. Межевич-Сухарева-Баум-Комкова (10:57)2%
  8. Маркова-Кушигина-Белан-Веденяпина (11:01)4%
  9. Пермякова-Магомедгаджиева-Струкова-Лебедева (11:05)11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTCAnonymous Poll212 voters

Кто победит на длинной пешеходной группе КК2026 у мужчин?

  1. Самолетов-Безносиков-Белявцев-Ушаков (10:31)14%
  2. Шапаренко-Губанов-Колесов-Шапаренко (10:35)4%
  3. Федин-Пешиков-Лапин-Калиновский (10:39)8%
  4. Демьянов-Урдяков-Дмитриев-Дмитриев (10:43)47%
  5. Жильцов-Ющик-Волошкин-Кудряшов (10:47)6%
  6. Иванов-Кузнецов-Семенов-Львов (10:51)8%
  7. Галлямов-Хуснутдинов-Кулешов-Сухарев (10:55)1%
  8. Глухов-Чурилин-Шипица-Гришкин (10:59)1%
  9. Мухаметшин-Бикушев-Гизатулин-Тутунин (11:03)2%
  10. Прядохин-Струков-Дзык-Квасков (11:07)8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 12 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Страховка НЕ готова” (@strahovkanegotova), 1,416 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strahovkanegotova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.