Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for True History

Channel

True History

@story_simple

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,827subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001202282274
TypeChannel
Username@story_simple
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/story_simple

Growth

5,8275,8765,851.513 August 2026 — 5,876 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,875 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,864 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,859 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,853 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,848 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,841 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,835 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,827 subscribers13 August 20265 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,820–5,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 05:205,827-8
1 Sept 2026, 05:385,835-6
29 Aug 2026, 08:265,841-7
26 Aug 2026, 10:195,848-5
23 Aug 2026, 18:085,853-6
20 Aug 2026, 07:035,859-5
16 Aug 2026, 21:255,864-11
13 Aug 2026, 07:545,875-1
13 Aug 2026, 00:165,876first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6733.5%
😢4522.5%
4321.5%
🔥157.50%
😱73.50%
👏63.00%
🤔52.50%
🥰42.00%
😁31.50%
🤩31.50%
🤯21.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2023 to 6 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Apr 2025, 17:58 UTC≈2,530 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

‼️ 👉 This channel contains the best money making loopholes you didn't know about! Are you ready to learn and work from anywhere in the world? Then 👇 Take the free training right now and start earning! 👇 https://t.me/+W0OPxSoqJDVjYjVk

3👍1😁1

6 Apr 2025, 16:13 UTC≈2,390 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Fighting in Breslau, March 1945. The German city surrendered, already after Berlin, on May 2. True Story

10

30 Jul 2023, 17:00 UTC≈11,400 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

The Entente offensive at Bapes, France, circa 1917. Soldiers follow the tanks. True Story

9👍3

30 Jul 2023, 09:00 UTC≈10,400 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

U.S. Marines carrying a comrade wounded in action on Peleliu Island, 1944. True Story

👍3👏2🔥2

29 Jul 2023, 17:00 UTC≈8,370 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

German Junkers dive-bombers before flying on the Eastern Front. True Story

👍43🔥3🤩2

29 Jul 2023, 09:00 UTC≈7,190 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

American soldiers of the 168th Infantry Regiment, 42nd Division in Badonviller camouflage, May 18, 1918. True Story

1🔥1

28 Jul 2023, 17:00 UTC≈5,450 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

U.S. technicians repairing a German StuG III shot-down assault gun, 1944. True Story

👍4🤔1🤩1

28 Jul 2023, 09:00 UTC≈5,040 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Fighters from the British Army's LRDG (Long Range Reconnaissance Desert Group) reconnaissance and sabotage unit, North Africa, May 25, 1942. True Story

7👍1

24 Jul 2023, 17:00 UTC≈5,160 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Crash of a helicopter over the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, October 2, 1986. All members of the crew were killed. True Story

😢12😱31

24 Jul 2023, 09:00 UTC≈4,510 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Vietnam's fields after the carpet bombing, 1966. True Story

😢12👍51

22 Jul 2023, 17:00 UTC≈4,080 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Japanese troops wearing gas masks and rubber gloves during a chemical attack, Second Battle of Shanghai, 1937 True Story

👍8

22 Jul 2023, 09:00 UTC≈3,780 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Remains of soldiers collected after the Battle of Verdun (the so-called "Meat Grinder"), the largest battle of World War I, France, 1918. True Story

👍8😢6🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @story_simple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“True History” (@story_simple), 5,827 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/story_simple.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.