9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,392–2,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 14:56
2,419
+1
27 Aug 2026, 14:16
2,418
-1
24 Aug 2026, 03:38
2,419
-6
20 Aug 2026, 20:57
2,425
-2
17 Aug 2026, 22:43
2,427
-5
14 Aug 2026, 13:35
2,432
+3
10 Aug 2026, 23:38
2,429
+32
7 Aug 2026, 20:17
2,397
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:24
2,397
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 2,419 subscribers
Avg views / post
725
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
16 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
10,145
Reactions total
2,206
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,646 reactions across 16 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,350
51.0%
🔥
646
24.4%
❤🔥
245
9.26%
🤬
88
3.33%
💯
74
2.80%
🙏
38
1.44%
👏
30
1.13%
👍
29
1.10%
🙈
24
0.907%
🤯
21
0.794%
😱
16
0.605%
🕊
12
0.454%
🤡
12
0.454%
🥴
9
0.34%
👎
7
0.265%
🤔
7
0.265%
🍓
6
0.227%
😍
6
0.227%
🥰
6
0.227%
🦄
6
0.227%
6 further kinds
14
0.529%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,646reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stopfallingdown. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ощущение, что Ведьма как архетип сильно обесценивается. Как будто верхние энергии важней материи. Как будто архетип слишком осуждаемый и несоциальный.
Так женщину лишают природного женского и власти над материей. Я как человек с очень развитыми верхними центрами очень хочу подружить с «низами».
Знаете почему? Потому что у той же Жрицы нет такой скорости материальной реализации. Ни один архетип не умеет так хорошо и…
Про силу ведьмы напишу в преддверие мероприятия 30 августа.
Мы уже выяснили, что не каждый, кто раскладывает Таро или руны, это ведьма или маг. Интерес к магии автоматом не делает вас ведьмой. Это очень сложный древний и очень табуированный архетип. Система его боится.
Среди женщин, занимающихся магией профессионально я встречала много архетипа маленькой девочки, которая прикрывается картами и ритуалами и постит св…
Вчерашняя тема про месячные взгрела дам. Такого количества отписок за пост еще не видел этот канал. Вам не всё равно? Спросите вы. Мне - нет. Мне интересно. Подписки и отписки - маркеры коллективного бессознательного.
Самое большое количество подписок - политика и посты про войну. Самое большое количество отписок- интимные женские острые темы. Месячные, изнасилования, секс. Даже мужики спокойней реагируют.
Триггеря…
В преддверие ароматного вебинара «Ведьма».
Я раньше делала духи ароматерапевтические людям очень много и диагностику по ароматам. Перестала, потому что канал ясновидения быстрей работает. Но свои фишки там были.
По ароматным предпочтениям видно что в подсознании происходит. Так вот сделала себе небольшую диагностику. Очень тянет на все чувственные цветы, сандал и проч. Но отвращение к розам с оттенком старости (све…
Планетарное.
Выхожу из кино неделю назад. И у меня яркое видение вдруг. Огромный зал, Межгалактический Совет, и я выступаю с кем-то ещё, с какими то большими сознаниями на тему преступлений хозяев планеты.
Замес примерно такой. Они вроде как взялись воспитывать землян, чтоб эволюционировали. А на самом деле грабили и насиловали людей и планету. И оборзели настолько, что пришло время сместить. Это то, о чем пишу рег…
Ночью такое было! В два часа ночи подсознание распаковало боль от травмы в возрасте двух лет. Отторжение родителями, родом. Кто тут не совсем человек, меня поймут. Когда твои частоты выше, чем в семье у других членов, на уровне биологии тебя отторгают. Это может быть даже невербально. Но ребенок чувствует. Взрослой психике по хрену. Вот мне сейчас по барабану, кто меня не принимает такой какая есть.
А для детской пс…
Когда мужчина сталкивается с произволом Системы, он либо ломается, либо подчиняется, или же активирует архетип мученика-революционера. В коллективном бессознательном нет хороших сценариев о борьбе с Системой. Неважно, победил ты или проиграл- все равно проиграл. Если остался в парадигме кармических игр, это проигрыш.
Коды доступа к управлению Пространством, где измерения старше и древней Системы, есть у женщин. Имен…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @stopfallingdown. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Выход из страданий” (@stopfallingdown), 2,419 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stopfallingdown.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.