Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Степан Огурцов

Channel

Степан Огурцов

@stepanogurtsov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,649subscribers

+168 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450780057
TypeChannel
Username@stepanogurtsov
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/stepanogurtsov

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4812,6492,5654 September 2026 — 2,481 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,482 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,506 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,525 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,558 subscribers29 September 2026 — 2,606 subscribers6 October 2026 — 2,618 subscribers13 October 2026 — 2,626 subscribers16 October 2026 — 2,637 subscribers19 October 2026 — 2,648 subscribers22 October 2026 — 2,649 subscribers4 September 202622 October 2026
11 measurements spanning 47 days, net +168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,456–2,674 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 06:382,649+1
19 Oct 2026, 06:102,648+11
16 Oct 2026, 14:562,637+11
13 Oct 2026, 04:402,626+8
6 Oct 2026, 18:162,618+12
29 Sept 2026, 23:192,606+48
19 Sept 2026, 10:212,558+33
14 Sept 2026, 15:552,525+19
11 Sept 2026, 09:592,506+24
6 Sept 2026, 07:392,482+1
4 Sept 2026, 19:222,481first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 15s
Average length
2m 27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

319 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537776000766210515019862.1%
🔥8125.4%
👍319.72%
👏30.94%
😁20.627%
😱10.313%
🙏10.313%
🤔10.313%
🥴10.313%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stepanogurtsov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 06:38 UTC259 views33 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🔔 Сегодня день знаний. Всех причастных поздравляю! И у нас сынок пошёл в первый класс... А я на том заканчиваю челлендж из 365 постов за год. Отдохну и вернусь, переосмыслив сделанное. Теперь постараюсь сделать акцент на ценности публикаций.

🔥16custom 537776000766210515012👍5

31 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC288 views13 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

В последний день лета задумываешься о любви к своему делу. Вот за что я люблю SketchUp — за возможность работать из любой точки мира. Взял ноутбук, открыл — и пилишь проекты. Хоть из деревни, хоть с моря, хоть с гор. Это, кстати, неплохо встряхивает — в отличие от сидения в душном офисе. И это рабочий способ реализовывать свою экспертность дистанционно: объекты воплощаются вживую, а на дистанции можно только прое…

custom 537776000766210515010🔥3

30 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC336 views19 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Ну и что тут такого... собрать ребёнка в первый класс... думал глупец-огурец 🥒

custom 537776000766210515015👏2🥴1😁1

29 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC398 views16 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Не буду притворяться, что это будничный завтрак... Это вообще консерва (не завтрак, а старая фотка 😁) Но место зачётное. Хороших выходных!

🔥10custom 53777600076621051505😁1

28 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC413 views12 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Video

1️⃣ Заканчиваем тему про окклюзию окружения и разбираем сохранение и настройки стилей, которые многие забывают включить. Это будет полезно для любого изменения стиля отображения модели внутри скетчапа.

custom 53777600076621051508👍4

27 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC454 views7 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Poll

Используете окклюзию окружения в SketchUp?

  1. Да, всегда!6%
  2. Только для демонстраций клиенту3%
  3. Имею возможность, но не включаю25%
  4. Не имею возможности (у меня старая версия скетчапа)34%
  5. Я вообще не использую скетчап31%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53777600076621051505🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC398 views9 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Video

Оккультизм Окклюзия окружения в SketchUp 1️⃣ Это новый вид затенения, который доступен в версиях начиная с 2024. Показываю и интересуюсь у вас...

custom 53777600076621051509

26 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC439 views22 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Горный видок в получасе от дома

🔥15custom 53777600076621051507

25 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC462 views18 reactionsread 4 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53777600076621051509🔥7👍2

24 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC467 views5 reactionsread 4 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53777600076621051505

23 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC484 views21 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

немножко алматинских красот и хорошего всем воскресенья

🔥12custom 53777600076621051506👍3

22 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC504 views17 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🏠 Натяжной потолок — удобно и недорого. Но есть нюанс. Сейчас пластик точно не в моде 🙅‍♂️ А глянец — это же чистой воды пластик, который сам об этом кричит с потолка 📢 Да, кто-то скажет, глянец визуально «поднимает» потолок за счёт отражения. Но как по мне... это того не стоит. А как по вам? :)

custom 537776000766210515015🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stepanogurtsov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Используете окклюзию окружения в SketchUp?

  1. Да, всегда!6%
  2. Только для демонстраций клиенту3%
  3. Имею возможность, но не включаю25%
  4. Не имею возможности (у меня старая версия скетчапа)34%
  5. Я вообще не использую скетчап31%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЗЕМСТАНДАРТ
@zems · 48,396
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Степан Огурцов” (@stepanogurtsov), 2,649 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stepanogurtsov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.