🙋🏻 Petición de destinos curso 26-27 | Vacantes definitivas para la adjudicación de destinos (seleccionad@s y personal interino): https://cantabriastec.org/peticion-de-destinos-curso-26-27-vacantes-definitivas-para-la-adjudicacion-de-destinos-seleccionads-y-personal-interino/ 💻 La petición de destinos comenzará el 11 de agosto a las 10 h. y finalizará el 17 de agosto a las 10 h.

Channel
STEC interin@s
@stecinterinos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,590subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001034742909 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stecinterinos |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stecinterinos |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 3,590 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 3,588 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 3,586 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 3,579 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 3,572 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,566 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 3,566 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 47.7%
- avg views ÷ 3,590 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,710
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,254 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
👆📊 Vamos a cerrar las encuestas sobre oposiciones docentes, ya con más de 600 opiniones recabadas entre el profesorado interino de Cantabria. (Por si faltara alguien de votar...)
🙋🏻 Petición de destinos curso 26-27 | Vacantes provisionales y adjudicación de destinos funcionarios de carrera sin destino definitivo: https://cantabriastec.org/peticion-de-destinos-curso-26-27-vacante-provisionales-y-adjudicacion-de-destinos-funcionarios-de-carrera-sin-destino-definitivo/
🙋🏻 Petición de destinos curso 26-27 | Procedimiento y calendario para la adjudicación de destinos (seleccionad@s opos y personal interino): https://cantabriastec.org/peticion-de-destinos-curso-26-27-procedimiento-y-calendario-para-la-adjudicacion-de-destinos-seleccionads-y-personal-interino/ Tal y como advertimos, han restringido el acceso a la web desde fuera del territorio español, salvo que se utilice una conexió…
📢 Recordad que mañana viernes 31, desde las 12 h., varias AMPAs se concentran frente a la Consejería con el lema "La escuela pública no se recorta". Desde STEC animamos a todo docente que pueda a acompañarlas, su lucha es también la del colectivo interino de Cantabria. #PorLaPública
🗳 ¿Qué momento consideras más adecuado para la corrección de la parte A en las oposiciones docentes?
- A su finalización, sabiendo en verano si suspendí y desconecto, o aprobé y debo pulir la parte B88%
- A partir del comienzo del siguiente curso9%
- NS / NC3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Qué te parece que l@s vocales del tribunal dejen de estar nombrad@s por sorteo y la mayoría esté designada por la Administración?
- Bien4%
- Peligroso, el sorteo favorece la independencia del tribunal91%
- NS / NC4%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Consideras acertado que se pueda traer la nota de otras CCAA para las listas de interin@s de Cantabria, sin demostrar ningún conocimiento del sistema educativo o del currículo cántabro?
- Sí, me parece bien7%
- No, es injusto89%
- NS / NC4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Cómo prefieres el desarrollo temporal de las pruebas en la parte A (tema y ejercicios prácticos)?
- Hacer el tema y a continuación o con un breve descanso, los ejercicios prácticos. De una.31%
- Hacer el tema por la mañana y en otro momento ya descansad@ (por la tarde o día sig.) los prácticos66%
- NS / NC3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Crees que la publicación anticipada de rúbricas y criterios de calificación mejoraría y aportaría garantías a la preparación y corrección de las pruebas de oposición? (Por ejemplo, en otras CCAA se publican con la convocatoria, a comienzo de año)
- Sí, facilitaría95%
- No, no lo creo3%
- NS / NC2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📊 Un mes después de las pruebas, con la relación provisional de aspirantes seleccionad@s en Secundaria y FP ya publicada... y cient@s de Maestr@s sin saber aún cuándo conocerán la calificación de la parte A de la prueba y por tanto si deben seguir puliendo la parte B, es buen momento para que el colectivo interino de Cantabria pueda valorar qué formato de oposición nos parece mejor... Hacemos una encuestuca sobre esa…
❗️OPOSICIONES REPOSICIÓN EEMM 2025-26 | Relación provisional de aptos, seleccionados y baremo definitivo https://cantabriastec.org/oposiciones-reposicion-eemm-2025-26-relacion-provisional-de-aptos-seleccionados-y-baremo-definitivo/ 📩 Subsanación de errores (días 28,29 y30 de julio de 2026) por medio del correo electrónico [email protected] 🗓 A partir del día 31 de julio relaciones definitivas de …
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @stecinterinos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🗳 ¿Qué momento consideras más adecuado para la corrección de la parte A en las oposiciones docentes?
- A su finalización, sabiendo en verano si suspendí y desconecto, o aprobé y debo pulir la parte B88%
- A partir del comienzo del siguiente curso9%
- NS / NC3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Qué te parece que l@s vocales del tribunal dejen de estar nombrad@s por sorteo y la mayoría esté designada por la Administración?
- Bien4%
- Peligroso, el sorteo favorece la independencia del tribunal91%
- NS / NC4%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Consideras acertado que se pueda traer la nota de otras CCAA para las listas de interin@s de Cantabria, sin demostrar ningún conocimiento del sistema educativo o del currículo cántabro?
- Sí, me parece bien7%
- No, es injusto89%
- NS / NC4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Cómo prefieres el desarrollo temporal de las pruebas en la parte A (tema y ejercicios prácticos)?
- Hacer el tema y a continuación o con un breve descanso, los ejercicios prácticos. De una.31%
- Hacer el tema por la mañana y en otro momento ya descansad@ (por la tarde o día sig.) los prácticos66%
- NS / NC3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗳 ¿Crees que la publicación anticipada de rúbricas y criterios de calificación mejoraría y aportaría garantías a la preparación y corrección de las pruebas de oposición? (Por ejemplo, en otras CCAA se publican con la convocatoria, a comienzo de año)
- Sí, facilitaría95%
- No, no lo creo3%
- NS / NC2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,589,111 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STEC interin@s” (@stecinterinos), 3,590 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stecinterinos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.