GTA да не трясись ты
🤣5🔥2

Channel
@steambalanceru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
23,335subscribers
-365 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001727898181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @steambalanceru |
| Description | Пополняй Steam тут https://steambalance.cc/ Наши каналы: PUBG: Mobile - https://t.me/sb_pubgg Mobile Legends - https://t.me/SBxMLBB Игры Hoyoverse - https://t.me/SBxHoYoverse Наш бот для пополнения в Telegram — https://t.me/steambalancecc_bot?startapp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/steambalanceru |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 23,335 | -39 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:59 | 23,374 | -87 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 23,461 | -82 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 23,543 | -271 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 23,814 | -194 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 24,008 | +32 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:54 | 23,976 | +175 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:31 | 23,801 | +475 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 23,326 | +455 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 22,871 | +1,216 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 21,655 | +479 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 16:18 | 21,176 | -659 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 21,835 | -198 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 22,033 | -30 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 22,063 | -22 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 22,085 | -24 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 22,109 | -28 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 22,137 | -655 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 22,792 | -49 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 22,841 | first reading |
332 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 115 of 117 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 332 (4 August 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 115,200 |
| Reactions total | 2,319 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 86 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,366 reactions across 320 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 947 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5341505359787890431 | 943 | 17.6% | |
| 🤣 | 908 | 16.9% | |
| custom 5341753660437207033 | 535 | 9.97% | |
| 😁 | 226 | 4.21% | |
| 🤯 | 192 | 3.58% | |
| 👀 | 144 | 2.68% | |
| 🤩 | 121 | 2.25% | |
| 💘 | 118 | 2.20% | |
| 🍾 | 113 | 2.11% | |
| 🦄 | 102 | 1.90% | |
| 😱 | 94 | 1.75% | |
| 😢 | 88 | 1.64% | |
| 🫡 | 78 | 1.45% | |
| 😭 | 75 | 1.40% | |
| 💯 | 74 | 1.38% | |
| 💊 | 72 | 1.34% | |
| 👏 | 62 | 1.16% | |
| 😍 | 60 | 1.12% | |
| 🍓 | 55 | 1.02% | |
| 19 further kinds | 359 | 6.69% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 321 of the 332 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 332 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @steambalanceru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 332 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
GTA да не трясись ты
🤣5🔥2
Posted without readable text
🔥8💘3🤯1😍1custom 53415053597878904311
Изображение при виде которого и геймеров замирает сердце 😖
custom 534150535978789043115🤣3😱2🙈1🙏1
Posted without readable text
🔥13custom 53417536604372070334😍2
Топовый ПК или гражданский пулемёт FN M249S со скидкой?
custom 534150535978789043110🤣5✍1😁1
Voice message, posted without a caption
🤣10custom 53415053597878904313✍2💯2
Сам уже довольно давно сижу на двухстах сорока герцах и недавно пришлось на пару дней вернуться за обычный монитор на шестьдесят герц. Это буквально физическая боль для глаз. Ощущение, будто играешь слайдшоу, в динамичных сценах картинка какая-то дерганная. И тут я вспомнил, как многие до сих пор на полном серьезе доказывают, что шестьдесят кадров за глаза хватает любому геймеру, а все остальное это чистый маркетинг…
custom 53415053597878904317🌭1💯1😱1
Posted without readable text
🔥7
Чтобы скрыться нажимайте CTRL
🤣19🦄3custom 53415053597878904312
Старый мем но мне до сих пор смешно)))
🔥23🤣10custom 53415053597878904311
В сеть слили предполагаемый трейлер отменённой Mass Effect 5
🔥17😢6👨💻2
🆕 Оплачивай нейронки с российской карты 😎 STEAMBALANCE теперь помогает оплачивать и продлевать подписки на популярные AI-сервисы: ChatGPT, Midjourney, Claude и другие. ⚡️ Без зарубежной карты и лишних переплат — выбираешь нужный сервис, оплачиваешь российской картой и получаешь доступ.
🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 332 posts we hold for @steambalanceru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
По шкале от 1 до 10 насколько у вас сгорела задница от тир листа по играм ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как у вас обстоят дела с VPN ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Где лучше сюжет ?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пора уже решить, где глину месить приятней всего:
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Уcтраиваем битву говна с мочой, от какой компании у тебя проц и видео карта ?
The shares total 219%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 332 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STEAMBALANCE.CC | STEAMBOOSTER” (@steambalanceru), 23,335 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steambalanceru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.