Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for stayalive.art

Channel

stayalive.art

@stayaliveart

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,417subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001677374663
TypeChannel
Username@stayaliveart
Created25 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stayaliveart

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4171,4421,429.56 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,441 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,439 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,436 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,433 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,431 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,428 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,427 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,426 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,425 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,424 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,422 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,420 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,417 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,413–1,446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 02:181,417-3
12 Sept 2026, 19:191,420-2
9 Sept 2026, 05:381,422-2
3 Sept 2026, 22:401,424-1
31 Aug 2026, 05:251,425-1
28 Aug 2026, 09:221,426-1
25 Aug 2026, 17:521,427-1
22 Aug 2026, 23:361,428-3
19 Aug 2026, 20:221,431-2
16 Aug 2026, 16:451,433-3
12 Aug 2026, 23:041,436-3
10 Aug 2026, 00:311,439-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:001,441-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:451,442no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:011,442first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,688 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,80967.3%
🔥36213.5%
🤩2338.67%
😱2007.44%
👀662.46%
👍180.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC383 views128 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

с днем челки

70🤩34🔥24

30 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC891 views232 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я в своей спайдер-мен эре 🕸️❤️

157🤩44😱17🔥14

29 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC754 views127 reactionsread 6 August 2026

в тиктоке написали под артом с уиллом, что я не автор, а этот рисунок в пинтересте видели вообще-то 🤷‍♀️

😱84🤩2514👀4

7 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,210 views178 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

sombr нарисовался ❤️‍🔥

111🔥43🤩23👀1

6 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC≈1,220 views160 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

рисую чью-то кудрявую голову

107👀30🔥23

29 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,240 views172 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

наделала всякого✨

105🔥36🤩23👀6👍2

27 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,190 views182 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ходила сегодня слушать арсения 🌝 (неожиданно)

138😱26🤩18

4 Jun 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,720 views154 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

посмотрела благие знамения наконец-то и чуть-чуть поскетчила

105🔥29🤩20

18 May 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,660 views200 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

оставлю это тут ❤️

151🔥29👍15🤩5

17 May 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,510 views229 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

обычное воскресенье ✌🏻 это произошло совершенно случайно и я до сих пор не могу поверить что дала пятюни всем импровизаторам...

148🔥49😱29👀3

21 Apr 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,740 views142 reactionsread 6 August 2026

если что, я жива 👋🏻 после сильной гиперфиксации всегда идет резкий спад, когда не могу буквально ничего. поэтому я сейчас в тотальном артблоке 💔 ничего так сильно сейчас не вдохновляет как месяц назад байлеры. я нарисовала арты, которыми горжусь и с тех пор ничего не смогла. даже не знаю за что мне браться и как опять найти смысл...

108👀17🔥17

28 Mar 2026, 09:47 UTC≈2,370 views128 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

еще такие новинки ✨

118🤩7🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @stayaliveart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“stayalive.art” (@stayaliveart), 1,417 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stayaliveart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.