DON’T FORGET TO JOIN THE NEW GROUP. 💰🐺

Channel
STASHER CAPITAL
@stasherpublic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,877subscribers
-104 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001995035491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stasherpublic |
| Created | 3 January 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stasherpublic |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 8,877 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 8,890 | -26 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 8,916 | -23 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 8,939 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 8,952 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 8,962 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 8,975 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 8,981 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 3 January 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.35%
- avg views ÷ 8,877 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 741
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (3 January 2024 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,670 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
okay I got it fixed. https://t.me/cryptostasherpublic https://t.me/cryptostasherpublic https://t.me/cryptostasherpublic don’t sleep on this group. it will be insane. 💰🐺
join this one. let’s make money. 💰🐺
https://t.me/cryptostasherpublic
gonna make a new group, because I can’t get the ads off from this one.
Posted without readable text
trying to remove these ads on my fucking channel. need to buy boosts. don’t know how this all works. telegram making it complicated.
i want to make at least 7 figures with trading memecoins ^
check out @cryptostasher on fomo. follow my memecoin journal, see what i’m buying and selling, and get 10% off fees when you trade through my link. https://fomo.family/r/cryptostasher
hey guys, welcome to the english group. i’ve been inactive here for a while, but that changes now. from now on i’ll be sharing regular updates on the market, $ZIG, and my personal view on what’s happening and where i think things are heading. i’m going to share a lot of value here, so turn on notifications and be ready. ⚡️
The vision’s already real, time just hasn’t caught up.
🔥 VIP Call Spotlight: PAAL AI (PAAL) Back in 2023, we highlighted $PAAL at around $0.018 in the STASHER CAPITAL VIP. 📈 Since then: Still up +150% after 2 years🚀 +4,250% at the top 💯 This is what happens when you get in early with the right context. 👉 Don’t miss the next one. Get free updates now
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @stasherpublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STASHER CAPITAL” (@stasherpublic), 8,877 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stasherpublic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.