Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for standfade test branch

Channel

standfade test branch

@standfadetest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,291subscribers

+535 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003985483112
TypeChannel
Username@standfadetest
Created14 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/standfadetest

Growth

7561,2911,023.528 August 2026 — 756 subscribers29 August 2026 — 787 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,291 subscribers28 August 20266 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +535. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 676–1,371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:201,291+504
29 Aug 2026, 18:56787+31
28 Aug 2026, 19:31756first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
252.5%
avg views ÷ 1,291 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,260
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held10 (14 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total26,078
Reactions total398
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

398 reactions across 8 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26165.6%
👍4110.3%
🔥266.53%
🤡164.02%
👎153.77%
💘82.01%
👏71.76%
😍61.51%
👨‍💻30.754%
🙊30.754%
🥰30.754%
😨20.503%
😭20.503%
🤓20.503%
❤‍🔥10.251%
💋10.251%
😁10.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 398 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC661 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Пацани тостинг ура ура бебл даёт тостить

26🤡4

28 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC677 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026

При первом входе в игру на тестовом сервере, будут выдаваться все скины + 999999999 голды и серебра, а рынок будет закрыт

🔥247🙊3👏2🤓2🤡1

20 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,570 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Щас занимаемся фиксом багов и переходом под новую серверную часть

👍229😍2💘1🤡1

18 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈2,350 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

51👍5👏5👎2💘2💋1🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC≈2,930 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Мы расчитываем на 40-50 онлайна в тестовой ветке, дальше этого порога мы не гарантируем стабильную работу серверов. Прошу не форсить данную ветку как лайт, чтобы не было на ней много онлайна, а были только те, кто реально хотят помочь проекту, а не дрочить скины

52👍9🥰3👎1💘1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈3,700 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Важно сразу отметить, что данный контент представляет собой стратегическую инициативу, направленную на валидацию ключевых архитектурных решений нашего серверного экосистемного ландшафта. Мы с энтузиазмом приступаем к фазе глубокого тестирования, что открывает новые горизонты для оценки масштабируемости и оптимизации производительности под нагрузкой. Это важный шаг в нашей миссии по обеспечению безупречной надежности

49🤡10👍3👨‍💻3👎2😨2😭2❤‍🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈3,490 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026

первая версия будет 0.19.4

43👎5😍3👍1💘1

14 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈10,700 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Это тестовая ветка StandFade, где будут проходить ОБТ с тестом новой серверной архитектуры, её оптимизацией и фиксами до официального релиза. Пока что будут только андроид билды. Добро пожаловать! t.me/standfadetest

24👎5💘2👍1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @standfadetest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“standfade test branch” (@standfadetest), 1,291 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/standfadetest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.