Channel
@ssdzz222
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,891subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002447515506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ssdzz222 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ssdzz222 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 1,891 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 1,889 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 1,893 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 1,897 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 1,894 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 1,894 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (6 May 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,535 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
若言的種草指南：聰明消費 避開「踩雷」陷阱！ 前言：花錢買開心 是每個人應有的權利！ 若言深知 每位新手客人都希望用有限的預算 獲得最完美的外送體驗 但你知道嗎 「踩雷」往往不是妹妹的問題 而是溝通上的小誤會！ 今天 若言就要分享一些「避雷秘訣」 讓你每次外送都滿載而歸 踩雷場景大盤點 你中招了嗎？ 「預算低 期待高」的矛盾循環 有些新手預算有限 卻期望值爆棚 總覺得「這個不夠正、那個不夠美」 若言想說：預算決定選擇面 先搞清楚自己能負擔什麼 再談完美體驗！ 「天上不會掉下完美妹 合理預算才是王道！」 「換來換去 好妹已被預訂」的遺憾 明明第一個推薦的妹妹符合需求 偏要「再看看」 結果好妹被搶走 回頭又後悔？「好妹不等人」 錯過就沒了！ 若言建議：信任專業推薦 別讓猶豫成為遺憾！ 「第一眼決定一切」的迷思 「第一眼不驚艷 直接打槍？」尤其在普通價位 這種標準根本不現實！真正的「好妹」不僅顏值高 更要服務周到、態度一流…
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
【外送新手防詐騙守則｜務必收藏】 最近外送詐騙層出不窮，不管你是剛入行的新手還是老司機，都一定要看清楚這幾點 1. 不要貪小便宜、不要信「免費約」 什麼「找炮友」「只收旅館費」這種，99%都是詐騙！ 天下沒有白吃的午餐 2. 不要相信交友軟體上的陌生邀約 很多詐騙會用假照美女帳號引你加Line／TG， 先聊幾句就丟連結、要你註冊網站、買點數、匯款保證金。 一旦付款，人就消失。 3. 永遠不要先匯款給陌生人／平台 真正的介紹人只會私下對接，不會要你「儲值」、「繳會員費」、「點數交易」。 記住：一提到「點數」兩個字，十之八九是詐騙。 4. 不要輕易給個資／傳私照／開鏡頭 對方可能截圖勒索、恐嚇要曝光。 不論對方多甜多主動，都不要給對方任何能拿來威脅你的東西。 5. 遇到可疑帳號，先冷靜查證 有疑慮可以先問我或找可信介紹人確認。 不要一時衝動亂轉帳、亂見面。 真正的安心，來自信任與正規管道。 若言所有外送安排一律…
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
若言防詐守則｜新手必看！強烈建議看完 少一次被騙，就多一次真正爽快的體驗！ 沒被騙錢 = 真的賺到 別安慰自己「花錢買教訓」，有時候一次失手，可能就是幾千、幾萬甚至更多直接蒸發，還得自己擦屁股，超不值得！ 若言整理目前最常見、最毒的三大詐騙套路，新手請牢記： ① 仙人跳（最狠、最危險！） 你剛跟妹妹約好，氣氛正要升溫…… 突然幾個大漢破門而入，喊著「她是我老婆／女友」，威脅要私了，不然就報警。 他們抓準你「不想鬧大」的心理，狠狠敲竹槓！ 不配合還可能動手。 若言提醒： 遇到這種情況，先保護自己安全，冷靜應對，必要時立刻報警，絕對不要心軟私了！ ② 轉帳詐騙（最隱密、最高發！） 加LINE後說要「驗證身份」，接著接到電話，要求你輸入銀行密碼、操作App，或說是「登記程序」。 實際上就是在轉走你的錢！等你發現時，帳戶早已被清空。 鐵律： 任何陌生人要求你報餘額、轉帳、輸入驗證碼，一律拒絕！正規妹妹絕不會這樣做。 ③…
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
若言的種草指南：新手必讀！聰明消費，輕鬆避雷，第一次就爽翻天！ 前言：花錢就是要買開心，這是你的權利！ 若言知道，每位新手都想用最划算的預算，享受到最棒、最舒服的體驗！ 但很多新手第一次很容易「踩雷」？其實大多不是妹妹的問題，而是心態與溝通沒抓對！ 今天若言特別為新手整理超實用避雷指南，讓你第一次就玩得開心、超值又難忘～ 新手最容易踩的雷，你中了幾個？ 預算有限卻期待爆表 明明預算普通，卻想要頂級女神級體驗，結果容易失望…… 若言想告訴你：先認清預算，再談完美！ 天上不會掉林志玲，合理預算才能找到真正匹配的好妹妹！ 猶豫一下，好妹妹就飛了！ 第一次推薦的妹妹明明就很對味，偏偏想「再看看」，結果被別人搶走，後悔莫及 好妹妹真的不等人！新手千萬別在這一步踩雷！ 只看第一眼就打槍？ 尤其在親民價位，「第一眼不驚艷就Pass」這個想法真的要改！ 真正讓你上癮的，往往是服務細膩、態度溫柔、技術一流的妹妹。顏值加分，但體驗才…
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
新手約妹小貼士鑒於有很多純情小處男經驗不多，不知道如何約妹，若言幫過不少第一次的哥哥，特別總結以下建議，陪大家順利開啟第一次： #處男常見的三種情況： ① 第一種：太緊張導致軟掉，半天進不了狀況… ② 第二種：習慣自己來，換成真人反而久久無法出水… ③ 第三種：最常見也算最幸運的，一緊張很快就結束… 第三種至少有爽到，前兩種過程通常比較坎坷，容易留遺憾。 #建議一： 如果經濟許可，第一次強烈建議訂兩節或以上。 很多新手第一次都結束得很快，容易有「還沒開始就結束」的空虛感；也有人因為過度緊張而遲遲射不出，最後還要自己解決。 拉長時間可以慢慢放鬆、好好培養感覺，讓第一次破處留下美好又難忘的回憶，而不是匆匆收場。 （這是許多第一次哥哥後續分享總結的經驗，值得參考） #建議二： 就算你特別喜歡小蘿莉、青澀學生妹或可愛型，第一次也建議先找有經驗、會帶節奏的妹妹。 強烈建議：跟若言預約時直接說「第一次」，若言會幫你挑選技術好、…
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
出來玩 新手最該懂的就是「體驗感」不是只求一次發洩，而是真正享受過程、感受差異。 對新手來說，第一次選對風格，整個體驗會完全不一樣，也會讓你之後更有信心繼續玩。學生妹 青澀可愛、講話軟軟的，帶點緊張跟害羞，像回到第一次談戀愛的感覺。新手最容易放鬆，也最有「初體驗」的甜蜜感。空姐 / OL 氣質好、談吐優雅，穿著專業又性感。互動起來很有女友感，同時又保持那份成熟的魅力，新手會覺得有面子又舒服。人妻 / 熟女 溫柔體貼、會照顧人，那種被呵護的感覺特別強。新手如果想被引導、被服務，熟女通常最上手，也最會照顧你的情緒。舞蹈生 / 模特身材 身材比例一流，曲線明顯，視覺衝擊很強。玩起來熱情又大膽，新手想追求強烈刺激、看得到爽感的，這類最對味。網美 / 辣妹 會聊天、會營造氛圍，整個過程像在約會談戀愛。拍照好看、氣氛到位，新手想拍幾張美照留念，或想要浪漫一點的感受，選她們準沒錯。大大們第一次出來花錢，千萬不要只想「最便宜」 新手最容易踩雷就…
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
教學 -＜大奶玩法＞ 喜歡大奶的人很多 會玩大奶的人不多 教你們 幾個大奶玩法D以上玩法 此玩法可用在今日推薦的妹妹身上 畢竟今天“殺”很大 “插” 是否也能大一點 ✌️耶 💥D罩杯：旋轉大摩擦 女生躺在枕頭上，將上半身撐起來雙手將美胸往內擠，男生則是跨跪在妳面前，把男生的巨龍往女生雙峰前進，讓男生在女生的雙乳中間磨磨蹭蹭，而且因為乳量比較大，男生還能一邊搓揉女生的渾圓，女生的嘴也是可以來好好地迎接男生，吻、舔、吹氣、輕輕啃咬逼得男生大喊好想要解放。 💥E罩杯：乳搖狂抖晃 E罩杯爆炸性感的女生最適合乳愛了，看到雙乳上下晃動的模樣，真的是任誰看了都無法把目光轉移，女生用渾圓飽滿代替櫻桃小口，跪在男生雙膝之間讓妳掌控主導權！除了可以上下揉捏，男生的眼睛也是吃滿滿冰淇淋，女生可以同時用胸部、嘴巴、手摩擦巨龍，讓男生撲倒女生的最後一招，除了使用潤滑劑其實還可以用自己的口水，超情色的畫面保證讓男生硬到爆漿！ 💥F罩杯：解鎖打臉成…
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
我鄭重和朋友們說一下！ #我不是仙人跳！ #我不是詐騙！ 嗚嗚，最近新加入了蠻多新朋友的，因為沒有配合過沒有信任度是非常正常的，我可以理解，但是我還是要說一下，我這邊是真的有在做介紹妹妹的，今年是第⑥年啦，有哪一個詐騙會花⑥年的時間等你上鈎呀！嗚嗚嗚，若言不是仙人跳和詐騙，反而教大家預防仙人跳和詐騙的攻略是讓你們在網路世界可以安全一些，怎麽變成對我產生了懷疑，疑惑了？小小腦袋，大大的誘惑！ 別人是不是詐騙！是不是仙人跳！我們都沒辦法保證，但若言能保證的是，若言不是仙人跳也不是詐騙，若言在八大中已經摸爬滾打⑥年啦，也有固定配合的老熟客，做的就是細水長流！做的就是長長久久！ #如果不專業，早就出局了！ #如果不用心，早就不做了！ #如果是騙子，早就消失了！ #做的越長久，越靠譜才對！ 不信，請看我的心血【頻道】！
❤1
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
很多大大都問過我： 為什麼要讓若言的建議安排？是不是只是想要推貴的？ 其實在若言的立場，真的不會害你們 我每天熬夜打廣告、回訊息，辛苦找來的客人，不可能只想做一次生意就算了 正因為我在意、珍惜每一位大大，所以才花更多時間跟耐心，幫你分析怎麼約、怎麼安排，哪個妹妹、哪個價位適合你 如果若言只是想賺快錢，我也知道怎麼做，但我不想騙人 大家賺的都是辛苦錢，我更希望你們玩得開心、覺得值得，這樣我們才能一直走下去 還有很多大大可能也會預算不是很充足但也會想要約三、四節 當然沒有不好～但老實說，那樣的素質通常比較普通 如果這樣 我更推薦安排 1–2 節 這樣不只妹妹素質高很多，雖然時間短一點，但每一分錢都花得值得，體驗起來更開心 若言做的，不只是推妹妹，而是幫你避雷、找到最適合你的安排 因為信任是累積來的，不是用一次快錢換來的 ❤️
❤1
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
都花錢了，就要玩得值得、玩得爽！ 很多人在第一次約的時候都在想 那要不要找個便宜的試試看 但是若言想講 既然都來約了 就應該讓自己爽到底！ 若言這邊都是純兼職的台妹 來自各行各業的妹妹出來兼職 你能一次遇見各種不同風格、不同味道的女生 青澀學生妹：純純的、害羞的，充滿戀愛感 OL、秘書、櫃姐：氣質優、會聊天，懂事又撩人 成熟人妻姐姐：經驗豐富、懂得男人，最會挑逗與照顧 網美、麻豆、空姐：身材火辣、臉蛋精緻，看一眼就硬 敢玩主動型：超騷、超開放，讓你徹底放縱釋壓 多試幾種，你才知道自己真正喜歡哪一款，也更容易遇到最合拍的。 有的溫柔細膩、慢慢把你撩到最高點 有的直接熱情、主動到讓你忘記時間 有時候，你多加一點預算， 換來的不是「只是漂亮一點」， 而是整體氛圍、互動品質、服務細節全面升級。 那種從普通到極致爽的差距， 只有真正體驗過的人，才懂有多上癮。
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
口碑從來不是喊出來的， 而是用時間、真誠與堅持慢慢堆疊而成的。 若言一直相信：種什麼因，得什麼果。 這條路或許辛苦，卻是最有溫度的。 在台灣數不清的茶莊裡， 若言或許不是最厲害的那一家， 但一定是最真心、最捨得為每位客人付出的那一個。 能在茫茫人海中被你發現、選擇、信任， 是若言最珍惜的緣分與幸福。 因為被需要、因為被信任， 若言才有繼續努力的勇氣與意義
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
很多哥哥常常以為：妹妹年齡越小，價位就一定越高～ 其實完全不是這樣喔！若言來好好跟你們解釋一下 妹妹的價位是看整體素質決定的，包含 #身材 #年齡 #膚質 #長相。 就像我們學生時代，明明同年紀，但同班同學裡有校花，也有如花。 👉打個比方： 18歲的妹妹，如果身材普通、五官一般、皮膚也不太好，就算年輕也不會高價。 但如果是30歲的姐姐，身材好、顏值高、皮膚嫩、氣質佳，價位自然不會低。 所以北部 4500、中南部 3000 的妹妹，不代表就是「老」～只是素質偏普通一點而已。 低價≠老妹，希望大家不要誤會，真心挑到適合自己的才最重要
Signed 若言高檔口碑茶~台灣高檔外送茶首選
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ssdzz222. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 37,458 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新手小課堂（新手必看）” (@ssdzz222), 1,891 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssdzz222.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.