19 measurements spanning 19 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,735–13,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 20:16
13,748
-7
23 Aug 2026, 06:44
13,755
-6
21 Aug 2026, 18:37
13,761
-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:47
13,766
-4
19 Aug 2026, 21:35
13,770
-4
18 Aug 2026, 21:03
13,774
-5
17 Aug 2026, 19:53
13,779
-4
16 Aug 2026, 19:47
13,783
-7
15 Aug 2026, 06:53
13,790
-2
14 Aug 2026, 02:06
13,792
-2
12 Aug 2026, 19:54
13,794
-2
11 Aug 2026, 20:13
13,796
-8
10 Aug 2026, 19:51
13,804
-6
9 Aug 2026, 20:12
13,810
-10
8 Aug 2026, 21:22
13,820
-7
7 Aug 2026, 17:52
13,827
-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:08
13,828
-5
6 Aug 2026, 02:31
13,833
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:15
13,833
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,460
Videos
≈232
Links
≈1,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
455 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
179
39.3%
❤
101
22.2%
🙏
75
16.5%
🤣
37
8.13%
🔥
16
3.52%
😭
16
3.52%
😨
10
2.20%
😁
9
1.98%
👏
6
1.32%
💯
3
0.659%
🫡
2
0.44%
🤔
1
0.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 455reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2024 to 16 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Important Update on Performance Sharing
Dear members,
We want to clarify some recent changes and address the concerns that many of you have raised about the absence of updates in our group.
Recently, SEBI issued an administrative warning instructing us not to share any past or expected future performance data related to our platform on public channels like websites or social media. In compliance with SEBI's guidel…
Spikes are the new normal.
In the last two months, there are 48 times when Bank Nifty moved more than 100 points in less than 3 minutes.
18 times it moved between +100 to 200 points
4 times it moved upside between +200 to 300 points
23 times it moved downside between -100 to -200
3 times it moved downside between -200 to -300 points.
In this video explained SEBI New rules in Tamil. SEBI has released a 18 pages consultation paper related to F&O Trading, more than 78 lacs traders lost close to 50k crores in FY24, this is the major reason for SEBI's action, here's the short summary what it means and how it can impact active traders,especially Option Traders.
https://youtu.be/lqcPtiypino
We are resuming our Tamil content with this new Tamil Youtube channel, every week new video related to rule based trading and investing in Tamil.
Here’s the video for this week
https://youtu.be/blI25eDgOCY?si=skUK93M9_huCz1DL
Are you limiting your trading profits by setting fixed targets? In this video, we delve into the debate between using fixed targets and letting your trades run without a predetermined exit point. Discover the pros and cons of each approach and learn why simply following a 1:2 risk-reward ratio might not be the best strategy for long-term success.
https://youtu.be/wiwyFmTil84
Election results just around the corner, let's analyse last 20 years historical data to find out how market behaved before the result, on the day of the election result & after the result. As an option trader one can plan their trades based on this information.
https://youtu.be/_4P7rrjD4Wk
Unlock the secrets to identifying multibagger stocks using the power of ChatGPT! In this video, we dive deep into the strategies and techniques that can help you spot potential high-growth stocks.
https://youtu.be/gZTBSijUNmI
From Rs.1 to Rs.120 in less than 30 mins. Huge move in Nifty OTM options.
😨10🔥8😭5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @squareOff_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@squareOff_Channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@screener_in named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Zerodha @zerodhain · 54,246 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Theta Gainers @thetagainers · 113,846 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SquareOff” (@squareOff_Channel), 13,748 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/squareOff_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.