8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,909–3,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 11:44
3,911
-5
20 Aug 2026, 09:25
3,916
+4
17 Aug 2026, 09:27
3,912
-4
13 Aug 2026, 14:06
3,916
-11
10 Aug 2026, 05:40
3,927
+2
6 Aug 2026, 20:53
3,925
+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:21
3,924
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:09
3,924
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 3,911 subscribers
Avg views / post
818
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (1 December 2025 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,636
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
382 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
128
33.5%
👍
126
33.0%
👏
40
10.5%
🔥
26
6.81%
👌
24
6.28%
😁
15
3.93%
💯
12
3.14%
🙏
4
1.05%
🤣
4
1.05%
🤨
2
0.524%
🤷♂
1
0.262%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام دوستان عزیزم.
👨💻 یکی از سوالهایی که همیشه ازم میپرسن اینه که:
«توی مصاحبه فنی از افراد چی میپرسی؟» 🤔
پیرو چند پست قبلی که درباره مصاحبه نوشتم، بد نیست اینم بگم که من معمولا افراد رو از نظر سطح دانش به چهار دسته تقسیم میکنم:
🔹 کارآموز
🔹 مبتدی
🔹 متوسط
🔹 حرفهای
و جالبه که نوع سوالاتم برای هر کدوم کاملا فرق میکنه.
مثلا اگر کسی بگه:
«من Senior هستم» 😎
راستش اولین چیزی که برام مهمه این نیست که چند تا Query از …
چند روز پیش روی یکی از دیتابیسها با یک سناریوی جالب روبهرو شدم که شاید برای خیلی از DBAها آشنا باشد.
کاربران از کندی شدید سیستم شکایت داشتند.
⏱️ زمان اجرای بعضی Updateها به ۷ تا ۸ ثانیه رسیده بود.
اولین چیزی که در Wait Stats جلب توجه میکرد، مقدار بالای LCK_M_U بود.
اگر فقط به همین Wait نگاه کنیم، احتمالاً اولین حدس این است که مشکل از Locking، Isolation Level یا یک Query بد است.
اما وقتی Blocking Chain را بررسی کر…
تشخیص سریع علت اصلی مشکلات (Root Cause Analysis)21%
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
سلام
📊 چند روز پیش درباره این سؤال نوشتم که چرا بسیاری از گزارشها و داشبوردهای سازمانی استفاده نمیشوند.
صادقانه بگویم، انتظار داشتم بیشتر درباره ابزارها، تکنولوژی یا نحوه طراحی گزارش صحبت شود.
اما چیزی که از دل گفتگوها بیرون آمد، برای خودم هم جالب بود.
تقریباً هرکسی از زاویه تجربه خودش به موضوع نگاه میکرد:
🔹 یکی میگفت باید کنار کاربر نشست و رفتار واقعی او را دید.
🔹 دیگری میگفت همیشه چنین فرصتی وجود ندارد و محدود…
سلام دوستان
📊 چرا با وجود صرف هزینههای زیاد برای ساخت گزارشها، بسیاری از آنها در عمل استفاده نمیشوند؟
در یکی از پروژههایی که روی آن کار میکردم، کنار یکی از کاربران سازمان نشستم تا ببینم گزارشها را چطور استفاده میکند.
اتفاق جالبی افتاد.
کاربر گزارش را باز کرد، چند ثانیه به آن نگاه کرد و بعد... فایل Excel شخصی خودش را باز کرد.
شروع کرد اطلاعات گزارش را یکییکی وارد Excel کند و تحلیلش را آنجا ادامه داد.
همان لحظ…
خیلی ازمن این سوال پرسیده میشه که میخوایم SQL Server رو شروع کنیم باید چیکار کنیم.
ببینید شما اول باید مشخص کنید در چه مسیری میخواین پیش برید
این چند مسیر در ادامه یادگیری SQL Server وجود داره.
1- فعالیت به عنوان DBA یا Database Administrator
2- فعالیت به عنوان T-SQL Developer
3- فعالیت به عنوان تحلیلگر داده و طراح گزارشات
خوب برای هر سه مسیر اولین و مهمترین چیز ، یادگیری T-SQL هست. هیچکدوم از این سه مسیر بدون یادگی…
روزی از یک مرکز درمانی با من تماس گرفتند 📞
گفتند سیستم به شدت کند شده و عملاً کار پذیرش با مشکل مواجه شده است ⚠️
پشت هر کندی سیستم در مراکز درمانی، فقط چند ثانیه تأخیر نیست…
بیمار منتظر است 🧍♂️
پذیرش کلافه شده 😓
صف طولانیتر میشود ⏳
پزشک منتظر ثبت اطلاعات است 🩺
و فشار کاری لحظه به لحظه بیشتر میشود
به صورت آنلاین وارد سرور شدم و بررسی را شروع کردم 💻
اولین نکته این بود که SQL Server به نسخه جدید ارتقا پیدا …
اگر دوست دارید یکی از چالشهای واقعی سازمان شما (به صورت کاملاً ناشناس) توی یکی از وبینارها بررسی بشه، فقط بنویسید:
«علاقهمندم»
تا برای هماهنگی باهاتون در ارتباط باشم. 🙏
اگر قرار باشه در اولین وبینار شرکت کنید، کدوم موضوع براتون جذابتره؟
۵ ریسک پنهان SQL Server که معمولاً دیر متوجهشون میشیم35%
Disaster Recovery واقعی؛ آیا واقعاً برای بحران آمادهایم؟23%
چطور سلامت SQL Server رو ارزیابی کنیم؟ (Health Check)28%
مانیتورینگ SQL Server؛ از تشخیص مشکل تا پیشبینی بحران56%
Performance و Capacity Planning در سازمانهای در حال رشد30%
Performance و Capacity Planning در سازمانهای در حال رشد30%
The shares total 202%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
سلام دوستان 👋
یه مدتیه دارم روی یه ایده کار میکنم و دوست دارم قبل از شروع، نظر شما رو بدونم.
قصدم اینه که یه سری وبینار کوتاه و کاربردی برگزار کنم؛ نه از اون مدل وبینارهایی که ۵۰ تا اسلاید نشون میدن و آخرش هم چیزی عاید آدم نمیشه!
بیشتر میخوام درباره چالشهای واقعی سازمانها صحبت کنیم. چیزهایی که توی پروژهها و شرکتها واقعاً باهاشون درگیریم:
قطعی سرویسها
مشکلات Performance
Backup و Disaster Recovery
مانیتورینگ…
سلام دوستان عزیزم
امیدوارم حالتون عالی باشه
من بعد از بیش از یک ماه تازه الان موفق شدم وصل بشم
این کانال رو در بله هم ساختم
گروه مشابهدهم در بله ساختم که اگه شرایط دوباره تغییر کرد بتونیم اونجا ادامه بدیم
لینک کانال
https://ble.ir/join/A5jkHESCYB
لینک گروه
https://ble.ir/join/741aKHYbrA
سلام دوستان
🚨 تا حالا شده بری Shrink File و با خودت بگی:
«اینا رو با یه SELECT نمیشه دید؟!» 🤔
خبر خوب برای DBAها و Backend Engineerها 🎉
بله… میشه! و حتی تمیزتر، سریعتر و قابل اتوماسیون 😎
🧠 مسئله چیه؟
تو SQL Server وقتی میری:
بخش Shrink Database
یا Shrink File
برای هر فایل اینا رو میبینی:
Total Size
Used Space
Free Space
اما این اطلاعات:
❌ اسکریپتپذیر نیست
❌ تو مانیتورینگ نمیاد
❌ تو گزارش DBA جایی نداره…
❤18👍1
Signed Hamidreza
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @sql_server. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تشخیص سریع علت اصلی مشکلات (Root Cause Analysis)21%
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگر قرار باشه در اولین وبینار شرکت کنید، کدوم موضوع براتون جذابتره؟
۵ ریسک پنهان SQL Server که معمولاً دیر متوجهشون میشیم35%
Disaster Recovery واقعی؛ آیا واقعاً برای بحران آمادهایم؟23%
چطور سلامت SQL Server رو ارزیابی کنیم؟ (Health Check)28%
مانیتورینگ SQL Server؛ از تشخیص مشکل تا پیشبینی بحران56%
Performance و Capacity Planning در سازمانهای در حال رشد30%
Performance و Capacity Planning در سازمانهای در حال رشد30%
The shares total 202%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 608,014 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SQL Server” (@sql_server), 3,911 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sql_server.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.