Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SPLASH/GO.

Channel

SPLASH/GO.

@splashandgo_f1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,973subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001757947322
TypeChannel
Username@splashandgo_f1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/splashandgo_f1

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9702,0121,9917 August 2026 — 2,012 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,012 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,011 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,009 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,005 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,995 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,996 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,997 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,998 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,995 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,992 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,988 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,986 subscribers29 September 2026 — 1,970 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,973 subscribers1,9737 August 20266 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 60 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,964–2,018 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 20:191,973+3
29 Sept 2026, 19:001,970-16
19 Sept 2026, 15:171,986-2
15 Sept 2026, 07:371,988-4
11 Sept 2026, 17:381,992-3
6 Sept 2026, 22:201,995-3
1 Sept 2026, 22:341,998+1
30 Aug 2026, 03:171,997+1
26 Aug 2026, 22:031,996+1
24 Aug 2026, 08:281,995-10
20 Aug 2026, 22:242,005-4
18 Aug 2026, 04:122,009-2
11 Aug 2026, 04:152,011-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:022,012no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:392,012first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2374.2%
😢39.68%
👏26.45%
👎13.23%
😁13.23%
🤔13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Racing Bulls: Por que a Equipe Está Indo Muito Além das Expectativas? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xIxT6ZmZxsQ

7 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A Alpine subiu no grid graças à Mercedes: entenda #F1 #shorts https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xGT-uY07aqU

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC131 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Empacou: Por Que a Haas Já Não Ameaça Ninguém em 2026 #f1 #shorts https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cnVjLrZGjVY

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC166 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A incrível escalada da Audi na F1 #Shorts https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lB8Amz60wIc

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC177 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Williams Tem a Queda Mais Acentuada do Meio de Pelotão #f1 #formula1 #shorts https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mVv9TOwGia4

😢3

5 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC201 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A queda mais brutal da F1 em 2026 #shorts #astonmartin https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LYXatLFCBWc

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC209 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Por Que o Paddock Elogia a Cadillac Mesmo com Zero Pontos #f1 #formula1 #shorts https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3_k4dIBhPMU

👏1🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC222 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

F1 em análise: As 11 Equipes sob a Régua: o Balanço de Meio de Ano #f1 #formula1 #shorts https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gQ7cRHQK7lE

👎1👏1

4 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC223 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Colin McRae Testou a Jordan de F1 em 1996: Como Foi? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/P2wLtsiaetg

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A Mercedes revelou o verdadeiro motivo do desastre de Russell #F1 #Hungria https://www.youtube.com/shorts/CK18reLSs-0

😁1

3 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC237 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A missão impossível da Escuderia Bandeirante #f1 #shorts #formula1 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mWFk4F4epJs

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC251 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

V12 vs V10: Hockenheim 1993 - a briga que ninguém esquece no GP da Alemanha #f1 #shorts #shorts https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4vbtVGaBnlg

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @splashandgo_f1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SPLASH/GO.” (@splashandgo_f1), 1,973 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/splashandgo_f1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.