Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sorryover Calls

@sorexovere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4,531subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002102241742
TypeChannel
Username@sorexovere
DescriptionOwner - @sorexover Manager - @stormRageee
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 26 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sorexovere

Growth

4,5314,5374,5347 August 2026 — 4,537 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,531 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,530–4,538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:334,531-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:174,534-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:324,537first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
796
Videos
20
Links
409

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

393 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17745.0%
👍9323.7%
custom 54452027495347809065413.7%
😁4010.2%
🤯133.31%
custom 524486318396907429592.29%
🐳71.78%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2024 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jan 2026, 10:09 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

19 Jan 2026, 01:07 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

9 Jan 2026, 18:51 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

14 Jun 2024, 12:11 UTC≈25,700 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Despite bloody market - euro starts today and $ALBART makes a comeback, as i said this is my long term hold Too good a narrative for the future euro meta, chart holding strong, seems team working a lot on this one FXdEk9gaoTsT5wnBpga5NvwrPnQyqq69CyFRaCkU1WKC

51👍20custom 544520274953478090617🤯9🐳3

Signed sorryover

11 Jun 2024, 22:17 UTC≈22,300 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

3x here, team got awesome marketing for launch

32👍6custom 54452027495347809065

Signed sorryover

11 Jun 2024, 20:55 UTC≈13,000 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Trying 🔴$DAVE on launch, pretty degen but i know dev had cooks before https://dexscreener.com/solana/37hcy3tee5etivo6zjs5bkcbrgox77qatqgznndn2cau DAVEjqDvzkFkxsbJHjmeAc4jTdVRsaKEC48XtisxqM11

9👍3🐳2

Signed sorryover

8 Jun 2024, 14:16 UTC≈10,300 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Lmao what a crazy market these days, people following $RNT and $TOPG as Tate meta, arguing which one is official, looking for best play And now he announce that he gonna launch an official one in 48 hours GM

custom 544520274953478090629👍4

Signed sorryover

6 Jun 2024, 10:41 UTC≈8,540 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

GM! $SOCKS is holding strong and following $MOTHER, as i said its best beta play to $MOTHER that at ath atm IGGY herself engaging with a community on twitter every day, she personally just bought $SOCKS too, i think its the only one token that she actually bought, still undervalued imo

👍86🤯2custom 54452027495347809062

Signed sorryover

4 Jun 2024, 17:59 UTC≈6,950 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Also was looking for $GAME on base for few days, looks like it doesn't wanna stop even at 4 mil Gonna hold this long term and pray, team seems decent with very great marketing, if more money comes to base this will be one of the targets for sure Twitter: https://x.com/GAME_Xstro Website: https://xstro.io/ https://dexscreener.com/base/0x5ad808df46bc029da4acd14462281febea4bafed

11🐳2🤯1

Signed sorryover

4 Jun 2024, 12:41 UTC≈5,720 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Also $Birddog hit 10 mil, congrats to sugar and holders, it doesn't seem like it wants to stop there lmao

17

Signed sorryover

4 Jun 2024, 12:32 UTC≈4,950 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Gm! $Albart hitted 4.5 mil today. As i said team got awesome marketing and many chads pushing it everyday Looking to add more on dips

14👍2🤯1

Signed sorryover

3 Jun 2024, 11:08 UTC≈4,620 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Gm! Looks like GME meta started again lmao 😔

😁19

Signed sorryover

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sorexovere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 585,741 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sorryover Calls” (@sorexovere), 4,531 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sorexovere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.