Channel
@sonikvnft
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
12,008subscribers
+9,043 since we began measuring on 11 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004410853608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sonikvnft |
| Description | Владелец @unh0lysonic |
| Created | 4 November 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sonikvnft |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 09:04 | 12,008 | +9,043 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 21:22 | 2,965 | no change |
| 11 Nov 2026, 20:47 | 2,965 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 4 November 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (4 November 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 42,900 |
| Reactions total | 1,432 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,432 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5971862007421343655 | 588 | 41.1% | |
| custom 5969801479681221039 | 405 | 28.3% | |
| custom 5969640826429512420 | 288 | 20.1% | |
| 💘 | 69 | 4.82% | |
| 🤔 | 39 | 2.72% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 2.03% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 0.978% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,432 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (57.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🍼Соска - НА НОЧЬ🍼 ПОДПИСКА 👇 @Sonikvnft @Spideygifts @Queen Итоги в 13:00 Реакция на удачу 🍀
custom 5971862007421343655109custom 596980147968122103996custom 596964082642951242085
😳 СКАМЕРЫ НА ПОДАРКИ В ТИКТОКЕ! В ТикТоке продолжаются стримы фейк-раздач NFT-подарков, мишек, сердец и другого... 🤬 Все эти стримеры отправляют подарки, премки — с помощью визуального плагина, то есть все это видит только скамер, и никто другой это не видит... Под разными предлогами — выгодный обмен подарками или обещания улучшить ваши гифты в x2 и x3 — скамеры разводят неопытных тиктокерских зрителей... 🤦♀️
custom 597186200742134365546custom 596980147968122103920custom 596964082642951242019
🎁НФТ ЗАХУР - НА 5 МИНУТ🎁 Реакция на удачу 🍀 ИТОГИ/ВЫДАЧА
custom 5971862007421343655131custom 596980147968122103996
За скрины с реакциями раздам ракетки 🚀
custom 5971862007421343655145custom 596980147968122103985custom 596964082642951242068
😏Тыква - НА НОЧЬ😏 ПОДПИСКА 👇 @sonikgift Реакция на удачу 🍀 ИТОГИ/ВЫДАЧА
custom 5971862007421343655157custom 5969640826429512420116custom 5969801479681221039104
Что это самый лучший канал по нфт сфере?
💘69🤔39❤29😁14custom 59698014796812210394
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @sonikvnft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@sonikvnft edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Соник в НФТ” (@sonikvnft), 12,008 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sonikvnft.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.