Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 해결

Channel

해결

@solve_liberate

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,589subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003115089932
TypeChannel
Username@solve_liberate
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/solve_liberate

Growth

1,5891,5941,591.57 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,589 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,588–1,595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:061,589-3
10 Aug 2026, 23:521,592-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:171,594no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:201,594first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
123.6%
avg views ÷ 1,589 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.081%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held14 (27 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total27,498
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1381.3%
👏212.5%
👍16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC440 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

최근 빅테크 관련으로 알아본 ETF 들 (아마존,마소,구글,메타) AIHY는 지난달 상장한 디파이언스의 AI 하이퍼스케일러 액티브 ETF로 상위 5종목이 90% 이상, 빅4가 약 80%를 차지해 집중도는 최고지만 평균 거래량 3천주대라 유동성이 사실상 걸림돌입니다. MAGS는 매그니피센트7 동일가중 ETF로 AMZN·MSFT·GOOGL 합산 약 42%, AUM 47억달러에 보수 0.29%이며, 장부상 T-Bill 등 현금성이 67%로 보이는 건 스왑 담보일 뿐 실제 주식 노출은 현물과 스왑 명목금액 합산 기준 100%로 카운터파티 리스크만 추가로 붙습니다. https://t.me/solve_liberate

3 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈6,620 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

# 삼성전자 (005930.KS) - Memory tightness and HBM leadership driving upside (메모리 타이트와 HBM 리더십이 만드는 상승 여력) 출처: Goldman Sachs, Giuni Lee, 2026.08.02 1. 메모리 수요가 공급을 크게 앞서며 공급 부족이 2027년 확대되어 2028년까지 이어질 전망 2. 2026-2028년 영업이익 379조원/562조원/650조원, DRAM 영업이익률 80% 내외 유지 전망 3. 최근 40% 조정으로 2027년 기준 P/E 3.1배, P/B 1.2배, ROE 50% 수준의 위험보상 매력 부각 ## 투자의견 및 목표주가 - 투자의견 Buy, APAC Conviction List 신규 편입 (2026.08.02) - 보통주 목표주가 49만원, 현재가 2

1

31 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC813 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

# 삼성전자 (005930) - Shareholders returns update the next catalyst (다음 촉매는 주주환원 정책 업데이트) 출처: UBS, Nicolas Gaudois / Jimmy Yoon / Luke Yoo, 2026.07.30 - 주주환원 방안 발표 임박, 2026년 기준 110조원 추가 환원 여력 - LTA 연말 캐파의 60-70%, 2027년 HBM 점유율 41%로 1위 전망 - 목표주가 55만원에서 53.5만원, Key Call Buy 유지 ## 자사주 매입 또는 특별배당 발표가 임박 2Q26 컨퍼런스콜에서 경영진은 24-26년 주주환원 약속을 어떻게 이행할지 매우 이른 시일 내에 밝히겠다고 언급했다. 여기에는 특별배당과 자사주 매입이 포함된다. UBS의 2026년 FCF 추정치 252조원을 적

2

31 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC407 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

# 삼성전자 (005930) - 2Q26 Clean Beat, Share Gains and HBM Leadership (2Q26 명확한 서프라이즈, 점유율 확대와 HBM 주도권) 출처: Morgan Stanley, Shawn Kim / Ryan Kim / Duan Liu / Cindy Huang, 2026.07.30 - 2Q26 매출 172조원, 전년 대비 130% 증가한 사상 최대 실적 - LTA가 메모리 캐파의 60-70%, 2027년 공급 부족 심화 전망 - Overweight 및 최선호주 유지, 목표주가 38.1만원 ## 핵심 요약 이번 실적을 둘러싼 핵심 쟁점은 LTA와 HBM 주도권, 캐펙스, 가격 결정력이 실적을 어디까지 끌어올릴 수 있는지였다. 2H26 소비자향 전방 시장이 둔화되더라도 회사는 서버와 HBM, SSD, 파

1

31 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC410 viewsread 7 August 2026

공급이 제한된 상황에서 하드웨어 구매자가 가용한 모든 수단을 동원해 수요를 공급에 맞추고 있는 상황을, 시장이 수요 둔화로 오독하고 있다고 본다. 이 비정상적 상황은 상당 기간 지속될 것이며 메모리 업체들은 기록적인 현금 창출과 주주환원을 시작할 것이다. 일부 투자자는 메모리 가격의 무한 상승을 바라지만 그것은 불가능하다. LTA가 순차 적용되면서 가격 상승 속도는 둔화되겠으나, 안정적 수익성과 대규모 FCF 창출은 지속될 전망이다. 이제는 밸류에이션 방법론을 볼 시점이다. 현재 주가 기준 삼성전자의 2026F FCF 수익률은 약 23%에 근접했고, FCF의 절반인 주주환원 수익률은 이미 11.6%에 달한다. 분자인 FCF는 상당 기간 전례 없는 수치를 기록할 것인 반면, 분모인 시가총액은 과도한 공포로 지나치게 낮아져 있다. ## 밸류에

31 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC347 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

# 삼성전자 (005930 KS) - Maintain Buy despite market's overconcern (시장의 과도한 우려에도 Buy 유지) 출처: Nomura, CW Chung / Eon Hwang / YJ Kim, 2026.07.30 투자의견 Buy와 목표주가 670,000원 유지, 현재주가 207,000원 대비 상승여력 224% 2027-28년 메모리 공급부족은 이미 상당히 확실하며, 예상보다 강한 LTA(장기공급계약)로 리스크 프리미엄이 축소될 전망 2026F/27F 주주환원 수익률이 현재 주가 기준 12%/18%에 달해, 대규모 주주환원이 밸류에이션 리레이팅을 촉발할 것 ## 투자의견 Buy, 목표주가 670,000원 유지 목표주가 670,000원은 12개월 선행 BPS 133,139원에 목표 P/B 5.0배를 적용

30 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC559 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

SK하이닉스 (000660.KS) - Significant de-rating unwarranted - reiterate Buy (과도한 디레이팅은 정당하지 않다, Buy 유지) 출처: UBS, Nicolas Gaudois / Jimmy Yoon / Luke Yoo, 2026.07.29 1. 주가는 6월 22일 고점 대비 52% 하락했으나 연초 대비로는 여전히 115% 상승 상태이며, 현재 NTM P/BV 1.66배는 장기 ROE 18.9%를 함의한다. UBS 추정치인 40.2%와 격차가 크다. 2. 오랜만의 첫 추정치 하향으로 2027년과 2028년 영업이익을 각각 19%, 18% 낮췄으나, 2027년 영업이익은 여전히 컨센서스보다 17% 높다. 3. 목표주가를 320만원에서 300만원으로 낮추되 투자의견 Buy를 유지한다. 현 주가는 1

3

30 Jul 2026, 06:19 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

SK하이닉스 (000660.KS) - 2Q26 – Slight Miss before Stronger Back Half (2분기 소폭 미스, 하반기는 더 강하다) 출처: Morgan Stanley, Shawn Kim / Ryan Kim / Duan Liu / Cindy Huang, 2026.07.29 1. 2분기 영업이익은 사상 최대인 60.5조원이었으나, 구형 HBM3e 비중 탓에 DRAM ASP 상승률이 30% QoQ에 그쳐 매출과 영업이익 모두 컨센서스를 하회했다. 2.HBM4가 예정대로 램프업되면서 하반기부터 믹스 개선과 DRAM ASP 상승 폭 확대가 나타날 전망이다. 3. 숀킴 - 투자의견 Overweight, 목표주가 260만원을 유지한다. 현 주가 155만원 대비 상승여력은 68%다. 실적 요약 2분기 영업이익은 60.5조원

30 Jul 2026, 01:47 UTC656 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

삼성전자 컨콜 - 시티 이세철 전무님 1. 1분기 실적 충담금 안된걸로 봤는데 2분기는 얼마 반영됐나요 ? > 지난 1분기 인센티브 미확정으로 1분기에는 반영하지 않았고 2분기는 상반기 누계로 반기 누적 약 10.5% 특별성과급. 회계적 차이는 있음. 3분기 반도체 판매하면 판매 원가로 녹음 2. 미국 상장 관련 > 종합적으로 고려해봤을때, adr 가치차이 발생 가능성. 국내 주주 및 전체 주주에게 긍정적인지 확인해봐야한다. adr 상장 가능성 높지않음 https://t.me/solve_liberate

4👍1

30 Jul 2026, 01:35 UTC≈10,800 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

삼성전자 주주환원 정책 컨콜 1. 특별배당을 포함한 주주환원 정책 시행 방안 적극 토론중 2. 차기 주주환원 정책 심도있는 논의 3. FCF 50% 주주환원 - (LTA 선수금 및 성과급영향 받을 수 있다 ?? 정확하지 않습니다.) 4. 믿고 기다려주신 주주에게 곧. 공유드리겠습니다. https://t.me/solve_liberate

2👏2

30 Jul 2026, 01:22 UTC634 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

# 삼성전자 (005930) - South Korea Technology: Semiconductors - Memory: Takeaways from Korea memory expert call (한국 반도체 메모리: 한국 메모리 전문가 콜 요약) 출처: Goldman Sachs, Giuni Lee / Taeyong Lee / Daiki Takayama, 2026.07.29 1. 컨벤셔널 DRAM 가격은 3Q26에 두 자릿수 QoQ 상승이 예상되며, 공급 부족 지속으로 4Q26에도 추가 두 자릿수 상승 가능성이 있다. 2. 내년 HBM 가격은 두 배까지 오를 가능성이 제기되었고, GS는 삼성전자 HBM 가격이 전년 대비 87% 상승할 것으로 보아 셀사이드 컨센서스(블룸버그) 52%를 상회한다. 3. 목표주가는 보통주 480,000원, 우선주

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @solve_liberate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 973,761 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“해결” (@solve_liberate), 1,589 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solve_liberate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.