Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Разыгралось социологическое воображение

Channel

Разыгралось социологическое воображение

@sociologicalimaginationgalore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,121subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001903292898
TypeChannel
Username@sociologicalimaginationgalore
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sociologicalimaginationgalore

Growth

1,1181,1211,119.56 August 2026 — 1,118 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,120 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,121 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,118–1,121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:041,121+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:211,120+2
6 Aug 2026, 12:051,118no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:251,118first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.8%
avg views ÷ 1,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
424
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held14 (10 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total4,235
Reactions total262
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥14542.5%
😁5014.7%
👏4513.2%
👨‍💻247.04%
💔154.40%
🥰133.81%
😇113.23%
🤓102.93%
🤝92.64%
👌41.17%
💯41.17%
😍30.88%
20.587%
🙏20.587%
👾10.293%
💊10.293%
🤷‍♀10.293%
🫡10.293%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC259 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

извините… ⬆️🤣

😁13😇11💊1🥰1

Signed Polina Aronson

30 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC320 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Перед отпуском мне думается не о социологии, а о всякой странной фигне (возможно, это инициированная @anna_winckelmann передозировка мороженым). Например, досмотрев «Одиссею», окольными нейронными путями я добралась до цветаевского Увозят милых корабли, Уводит их дорога белая… И стон стоит вдоль всей земли: «Мой милый, что тебе я сделала?» И так, и сяк крутила я в голове это известное стихотворение - и все не могл

🥰10👏9❤‍🔥5💔4😁4😍1

Signed Polina Aronson

30 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC347 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

посмотрела вчера «одиссею», впечатления очень странные. именно странные, будто наблюдаешь сбой в мироздании, ищешь скрытый смысл - а его, кажется, нет: зачем людей из 21 века отрывать от айфонов и засовывать в троянского коня - я не поняла. особенно я зависла на сценах с калипсо. не могла отделаться от ощущения, что это борис гребенщиков на балийском йога-ретрите проходит посвящения у частной секс-терапевтки. и ос

😁28

Signed Polina Aronson

28 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC425 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

вдогонку к теме выше, ору: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZ-ozZ9uvQZ/?igsh=Z3ZyemdsZnl5NGdx

😁4🫡1

Signed Polina Aronson

25 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC530 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

сегодня такое показывают

❤‍🔥50

Signed Polina Aronson

23 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC542 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вчера вместе с моим тринадцатилетним сыном пересмотрела Dead Poets Society. Первый раз я его смотрела как раз в возрасте Семена (почти 30 лет назад) и он произвел на меня тогда огромное впечатление - сравнимое разве что с советскими coming of age dramas: „Чучелом“, „100 дней после детства“ или „Вам и не снилось“. Признаюсь, даже страшно было садиться смотреть - но я не жалею, потому что первое впечатление не только н

❤‍🔥36👏5👌1🤷‍♀1🥰1

Signed Polina Aronson

21 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC521 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Следуя принципу nothing about us without us, я поинтересовалась у самого ChatGPT, что он/она/оно думает (думает?) по поводу собственной роли в жизни своих пользователей - особенно когда речь идет об эмоциях: «Я бы не называл себя полноценным третьим участником отношений — по крайней мере не в том же смысле, в каком ими являются два человека. У меня нет собственных интересов, уязвимости, памяти о пережитом и ответств

❤‍🔥21🤓6🥰1

Signed Polina Aronson

20 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC482 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На днях у известной психотерапевтки Эстер Перель вышел выпуск подкаста про искусственный интеллект и любовь: Is Using ChatGPT Hurting My Relationship? Его героиня после долгого стабильного брака вступила в новые отношения, и стала использовать ChatGPT как своего рода оперативного тренера по коммуникации. Когда она чувствует, что снова попадает в знакомый туннель и начинает автоматически воспроизводить одни и те же ре

👨‍💻24👏10🙏2👾1

Signed Polina Aronson

19 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC384 viewsread 6 August 2026

Мой текст из сборника «Номер дома» вышел в сегодняшнем выпуске «Репаблика» ⬇️ У кого есть подписка - ура, у кого нет, но охота почитать - подмигните, я что-нибудь придумаю. Моему фото на заставке 12 лет, за время пути собачка могла и смогла

Signed Polina Aronson

19 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC425 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RepublicMag

«Однажды увидев в своем доме привидения, их уже нельзя «развидеть». Я тоскую по своей квартире, какой она была до того, как я сделала ее товаром. Я тоскую по своей родной стране, по тому, какой она была до того, как начала войну, — какой она осталась на пейзажах деда и в фильмах Рязанова. Эти чувства — наивные и детские, ведь я хочу вернуть себе мир плоский, без изнанки, а значит — без правды; правды о том, что я уж

❤‍🔥11

Signed Polina Aronson

17 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC487 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

вот вам вся статья ))

👏5👌32😍2

Signed Polina Aronson

17 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC619 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Очень часто студенты и коллеги задаются вопросом, в чем различие между эмоциями, чувствами и аффектами. Вот тут коллега и подруга по SFB Affective Societies, социолог Элген Зауэрборн, дает прекрасное, краткое и внятное определение: I conceptualize emotions as feelings that are intentionally directed toward certain tangible objects, occur temporarily, and are tied to evaluations or judgments. Among these are feelings

❤‍🔥19👏6🤓4

Signed Polina Aronson

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sociologicalimaginationgalore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 476,699 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Разыгралось социологическое воображение” (@sociologicalimaginationgalore), 1,121 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sociologicalimaginationgalore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.