Channel
@smotrim_ponimaem
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
1,433subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001395650530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @smotrim_ponimaem |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 3 February 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smotrim_ponimaem |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 1,433 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 1,432 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 1,437 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:48 | 1,439 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 1,440 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,441 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,438 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 1,436 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 1,432 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 1,431 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 1,433 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,433 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 February 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Failed job interview. Part 2. I wasn’t fully confident in my grasp of the business topic, and deep down, I saw this as my one and only shot to break into an international job market. This is not the right mood that helps you to achieve your goals and later I will tell you how I control my emotions and expectations now. It is not only about job interview and not only about professional life, it is an approach in gene…
Poll, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Failed job interview. Part 1. Hello everyone, I want to share a story about my first time trying to land a job abroad, at a Belgian IT consulting firm. The opportunity came my way quite naturally through the company director, who was a software solution supplier of my previous employer. I had a chance to interact with him at work environment and to socialize during his business visit in Moscow. He was friendly, chi…
Poll, posted without a caption
Hi All! Do you also have a lot on your plate on Mondays? To have a lot on one’s plate — one has too much to do, the workload is heavy, the schedule is too hectic In the next post I’m going to tell you how I failed my first job interview for a Belgian IT consulting company. What I learned from that frustrating experience to get offered my dream job at a different company six months later, surprisingly also in Belgiu…
Video message, posted without a caption
Here are some common expressions to start and end business meetings! The very first phrasal verbs I learned when I kicked off my new role in Brussels 🤷🏻♀️ Kick off — to start a meeting/project Ex: Let’s wait another minute for everyone to join the call… Look like we are all complete, so we can kick it off. Wrap up — to end a meeting/task Ex: It’s 6:30pm and we are overtime so let’s wrap up this meeting and I’ll…
Channel name was changed to «English with Suits»
I have not posted anything in a while. But there was a good reason for that as my life changed dramatically… 🤯 March 8 marks the first anniversary of my relocation to Europe to start the job of my dream as a data integration developer in a global corporation. 🎉🎉🎉 I will not continue posting Suits but rather share with you some insights on living and working abroad. 😇 As I live in a francophone country (and currently…
#Squeaky clean – морально безупречный #Put in charge of – поручать, ставить во главе #be off the hook – уходить от ответственности, выйти сухим из воды #Grammar Давайте немного грамматики, но без скучных объяснений условных предложений, модальных глаголов. Прочувствуем язык… и запомним, как говорить: should have just asked me – могла бы спросить напрямую would have told me – ты бы мне сообщила (если б хотела) might…
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smotrim_ponimaem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English with Suits” (@smotrim_ponimaem), 1,433 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smotrim_ponimaem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.