Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Slavik Alerts 🚨

Channel

Slavik Alerts 🚨

@slavikalerts

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

3,811subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001671622090
TypeChannel
Username@slavikalerts
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/slavikalerts

Growth

3,8113,8613,8367 August 2026 β€” 3,861 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 3,860 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 3,851 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 3,848 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 3,837 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 3,827 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 3,818 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 3,811 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,804–3,869 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 12:053,811-7
24 Aug 2026, 22:063,818-9
20 Aug 2026, 21:453,827-10
17 Aug 2026, 12:043,837-11
13 Aug 2026, 16:283,848-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:553,851-9
7 Aug 2026, 20:513,860-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:153,861first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘9163.6%
❀3423.8%
❀‍πŸ”₯74.90%
🌚42.80%
🌭32.10%
πŸ‘10.699%
πŸ”₯10.699%
😁10.699%
🀯10.699%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2025 to 6 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2025, 17:10 UTCβ‰ˆ3,920 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1964375331076182362?s=52

πŸ‘3❀1❀‍πŸ”₯1

4 Sept 2025, 08:56 UTCβ‰ˆ4,000 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The last Blood Moon (Nov 2022) lined up with the FTX collapse and one of crypto’s biggest dumps. Sept 7 brings the next Blood Moon β€” will we see a mega dump , will history repeat?

❀10🌚4πŸ‘4πŸ‘1

23 Aug 2025, 11:49 UTCβ‰ˆ4,340 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1959219142101245957

πŸ‘9

20 Aug 2025, 10:23 UTCβ‰ˆ3,430 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Closed 3D, breaking down rising wedge Whats next (most likely imo): Retest of rising Wedge at 116900 Breaking down to 50EMA at 107500 NFA

❀16πŸ‘5

19 Aug 2025, 20:30 UTCβ‰ˆ2,690 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1957902758864195727?s=52

πŸ‘4

18 Aug 2025, 12:59 UTCβ‰ˆ2,220 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1957416407269830980?s=52

πŸ‘3

14 Aug 2025, 15:02 UTCβ‰ˆ2,280 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Seems like on every bounce to the upside people try to go long

πŸ‘6

14 Aug 2025, 14:48 UTCβ‰ˆ1,950 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin CME Gap, NOT closed YET! Possible bounce to 120K and down again, be careful Jim Cramer was on point as always

πŸ‘12❀4

12 Aug 2025, 20:52 UTCβ‰ˆ1,670 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1955371482223423498?s=52

πŸ‘2

12 Aug 2025, 13:04 UTCβ‰ˆ1,600 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1955252775559831618?s=52

πŸ‘7❀1

11 Aug 2025, 09:28 UTCβ‰ˆ1,690 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1954837248802693198?s=52

🌭3πŸ‘3❀1

6 Aug 2025, 21:02 UTCβ‰ˆ1,850 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptobratan1/status/1953197129180094499?s=52

πŸ‘5❀‍πŸ”₯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @slavikalerts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œSlavik Alerts πŸš¨β€ (@slavikalerts), 3,811 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slavikalerts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.