Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kurdish AZOV πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Channel

Kurdish AZOV πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

@slavaukrini

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

4,259subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512471790
TypeChannel
Username@slavaukrini
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/slavaukrini

Growth

4,2554,2884,271.57 August 2026 β€” 4,288 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 4,288 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 4,287 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 4,279 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 4,275 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 4,268 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 4,264 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 4,255 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 4,259 subscribers4,2597 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,250–4,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 09:194,259+4
24 Aug 2026, 12:344,255-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:034,264-4
17 Aug 2026, 16:264,268-7
14 Aug 2026, 00:574,275-4
11 Aug 2026, 03:514,279-8
7 Aug 2026, 18:084,287-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:024,288no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:504,288first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 23 September 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 08s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

393 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀14135.9%
🀣8822.4%
πŸ”₯5012.7%
πŸ‘4411.2%
😑4210.7%
πŸ‘Ž92.29%
🫑82.04%
😒41.02%
πŸ€”41.02%
😱30.763%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 393reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2025 to 30 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2025, 14:10 UTCβ‰ˆ7,680 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😑21❀7😒4😱2

30 Sept 2025, 14:09 UTCβ‰ˆ7,530 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Turkish fishermen caught a Ukrainian Magura sea drone.

❀11πŸ€”1

30 Sept 2025, 14:09 UTCβ‰ˆ6,200 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Dnipro is under attack by Russian drones, and there is already damage in the city.

😑18❀2😱1

26 Sept 2025, 23:59 UTCβ‰ˆ5,960 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Archived Footage 🚨: A Turkish Cobra helicopter shot down by a Kurdish Guerrilla. It may be the best shot in world history.

❀39πŸ”₯22🫑6😑2

25 Sept 2025, 17:24 UTCβ‰ˆ5,030 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Russian fuel going up in flames left and right.

❀20πŸ‘11πŸ‘Ž2πŸ€”1

25 Sept 2025, 15:43 UTCβ‰ˆ4,380 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

β€œLavrov has been Russia’s foreign minister since the birth of Jesus Christ, and nothing useful has ever come out of his mouth. Let’s not pay too much attention to him,” said NATO Secretary General Rutte about Lavrov.

🀣32❀8πŸ‘Ž2πŸ”₯1

25 Sept 2025, 15:39 UTCβ‰ˆ3,970 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

A Russian "Bukhanka" lost a race to a Ukrainian FPV drone. The operator carries out a technical inspection and records hits in intimate spots. The Russians are marked as 300s (wounded).

❀11πŸ‘5πŸ‘Ž1πŸ”₯1

25 Sept 2025, 14:41 UTCβ‰ˆ3,460 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"It will be war." - Russian Ambassador to France Alexey Meshkov said on RTL radio that the downing of a Russian aircraft over a NATO country would mean the beginning of a military conflict. He also added that NATO aircraft allegedly "quite often" violate Russian airspace, but they are not being shot down.

πŸ€”2πŸ”₯1😑1

25 Sept 2025, 14:37 UTCβ‰ˆ3,200 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Heavy fuel tanker movement spotted today heading toward Simferopol and other major Crimean cities. Time to let some sanction-powered drones fix that

πŸ”₯14πŸ‘4❀2πŸ‘Ž1

25 Sept 2025, 13:16 UTCβ‰ˆ3,120 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Russian officials must either end the war or check the shelters, President Zelenskyy said. He added that President Trump authorized retaliatory strikes against Russia if the aggressor targets Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.

πŸ‘19❀2πŸ‘Ž1

25 Sept 2025, 12:43 UTCβ‰ˆ2,960 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

A major crisis in Russia πŸ”₯ In the past, Ukrainian forces targeted Russian military bases, airports, and ammunition depots inside Russian territory. Unfortunately, this was of no use on the Ukrainian front, as Russian forces continued their advance, albeit slowly. Consequently, over the past two months, Ukraine changed its policy and began striking only oil depots and refineries, achieving strong and successful strik…

❀15🀣5

24 Sept 2025, 19:57 UTCβ‰ˆ3,100 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

They just can’t make it to the beach. Russians in Tuapse are hiding from the bullets of their own air defense during today’s attack. One Russian was likely wounded by friendly fire, judging by the comments and screams in the background.

🀣9❀7

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @slavaukrini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œKurdish AZOV πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦β€ (@slavaukrini), 4,259 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slavaukrini.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.