Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🍀𝐒𝐊𝐙 𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐁𝐎𝐗 | 말리

@skzsbox

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,615subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001854058500
TypeChannel
Username@skzsbox
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skzsbox

Growth

1,6151,6191,6176 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,619 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,615 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,614–1,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:271,615-4
10 Aug 2026, 03:521,619+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:351,617no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:301,617first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.8%
avg views ÷ 1,615 subscribers
Avg views / post
578
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held24 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total13,862
Reactions total1,865
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,865 reactions across 24 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 523331185224662704492349.5%
custom 528049918045902435439421.1%
🐳1809.65%
custom 54292307625933859741558.31%
custom 52335090857347942661156.17%
custom 5354896432161632201985.25%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,865reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 24 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skzsbox. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC251 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЭТО ПРОСТО АХРИНИТЕЛЬНО!!!🔥🔥🔥🔥

custom 523331185224662704432custom 52804991804590243545

7 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC227 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/BZ4UzthYTss?si=0gqTonndMGtpxm6k

custom 535489643216163220130custom 52333118522466270443

6 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC239 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hyunjinsplanetPhoto

▫️ ▫️▫️#twitter upd О8 . 07 ▫️▫️▫️( frōm ﹫ stay) ©️ спойлеры новой стрижки Хёнджина 📍 ▫️

custom 523331185224662704436custom 528049918045902435416

6 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC310 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

опять навёл суету))

custom 523331185224662704417

5 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC427 views133 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а ещооооооо у меня новый говорящий Джиниретик!)) (а это еще Наташины новые говорящие Минсоны😂)

🐳66custom 523331185224662704440custom 528049918045902435423custom 53548964321616322014

5 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC421 views91 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

зис энд зет 🤗

custom 535489643216163220164custom 542923076259338597426custom 52333118522466270441

5 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC432 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

если я выучу слова, я смогу так же 🤣

custom 523331185224662704458

4 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC445 views119 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я тут, кстати, вчера вот - ходила на поклон))) забавно, что когда я подошла фоткаться, к витрине подошли ещё две стеечки. мы переглянуляись, похихикали, сфотографировались и разошлись) мило 🥰

custom 523350908573479426662custom 542923076259338597431custom 528049918045902435415custom 523331185224662704411

4 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC442 views100 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

я уже битый день не могу закончить комикс, который собиралась выложить на день рождения Стей и из-за этого не выкладываю больше ничего вообще! мне это категорически не нравится, поэтому я пришла с повинной!) комикс будет! но, вероятно, он уже будет не так актуален как был бы, если был бы вовремя, ну штош… а чтобы дальше не затягивать с поздравлениями, скажу - я вас люблю!) скизей люблю!)) рисовать люблю!))) и очен

🐳43custom 523331185224662704441custom 523350908573479426616

3 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC477 views179 reactionsread 7 August 2026

пупсики! мне пришли результаты гистологии после операции. короче - все хорошо! вторая операция не нужна. (знаю, что многие из вас не в курсе происходящего, но вы и не забивайте голову. главная новость что все хорошо! эти нюансы для тех, кто ждал 😅)

custom 5233311852246627044111custom 528049918045902435435custom 542923076259338597428🐳5

31 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC702 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

я просто продолжаю потихоньку ахреневать от концертного Хёнджина 🥰🥰🥰

custom 523331185224662704476custom 523350908573479426622custom 528049918045902435411

30 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC982 views103 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

и зачем я зашла в твиттер… 😳

custom 528049918045902435475custom 523331185224662704422custom 52335090857347942666

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @skzsbox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 211,253 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍀𝐒𝐊𝐙 𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐁𝐎𝐗 | 말리” (@skzsbox), 1,615 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skzsbox.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.