Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✎skoolsthetic࿐ ˊˎ-

Channel

✎skoolsthetic࿐ ˊˎ-

@skoolsthetic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562503969
TypeChannel
Username@skoolsthetic
DescriptionJust to focus more on studying! - Nothing is impossible~ Lovely partner : @aesthetic_kingdom
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 26 December 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/skoolsthetic

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 December 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Videos
6
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 46s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

28 Feb 2022, 16:26 UTC96 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

╰- -𓄼-𑁦🍓︶꒦꒷︶꒦︶꒷ʚ-̇⊹🍯︶꒷꒦︶ #tips [ @skoolsthetic ]

27 Feb 2022, 06:25 UTC96 viewsread 30 August 2026
Poll

Should I post some you tube channels which motivate you to study?

  1. Nope...0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Feb 2022, 06:19 UTC52 viewsread 30 August 2026

𓍯📚ˑ𖦆 Work hard in silence. Let success make the noise🔖💥 ╰- -𓄼-𑁦🔖︶꒦꒷︶꒦︶꒷ʚ-̇⊹📑︶꒷꒦︶

27 Feb 2022, 06:18 UTC49 viewsread 30 August 2026

𓍯📚ˑ𖦆 Don’t wish it were easier. Wish you were better. ╰- -𓄼-𑁦🔖︶꒦꒷︶꒦︶꒷ʚ-̇⊹📑︶꒷꒦︶

12 Feb 2022, 11:22 UTC58 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Motivation 𝑲-𝒅𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒂 𝑴𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑽𝒊𝒅 ╰- -𓄼-𑁦🍓︶꒦꒷︶꒦︶꒷ʚ-̇⊹🍯︶꒷꒦ Ꮺ‌Credits to the rightful owner #motivation #video

12 Feb 2022, 11:14 UTC51 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Motivation 𝑲-𝒅𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒂 𝑴𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑽𝒊𝒅 ╰- -𓄼-𑁦🍓︶꒦꒷︶꒦︶꒷ʚ-̇⊹🍯︶꒷꒦ Ꮺ‌Credits to the rightful owner #motivation #video

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @skoolsthetic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Feb 2022, 06:25 UTCFinal Results11 voters

Should I post some you tube channels which motivate you to study?

  1. Nope...0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2021 to 28 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“✎skoolsthetic࿐ ˊˎ-” (@skoolsthetic). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skoolsthetic.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.