Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for работаю на складе озон теперь / вб уволили

Channel

работаю на складе озон теперь / вб уволили

@skladckoy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

6,281subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002014572710
TypeChannel
Username@skladckoy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/skladckoy

Growth

6,2816,3446,312.57 August 2026 — 6,344 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,344 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,342 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,337 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,331 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,324 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,315 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,302 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,296 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,281 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 24 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,272–6,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 05:136,281-15
29 Aug 2026, 00:136,296-6
25 Aug 2026, 20:116,302-13
22 Aug 2026, 21:586,315-9
19 Aug 2026, 11:276,324-7
16 Aug 2026, 20:376,331-6
13 Aug 2026, 13:376,337-5
10 Aug 2026, 10:466,342-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:556,344no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:176,344first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.0%
avg views ÷ 6,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.318%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 April 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,200
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,165 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯28624.5%
🔥26022.3%
custom 586189601412166794916113.8%
🤝12610.8%
😭12310.6%
927.90%
custom 5426983502560132867605.15%
custom 5318979553400464367443.78%
👎131.12%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skladckoy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈2,200 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А как тогда? И как проверяют на кпп? И есть кто работает на коледино сейчас, как там вообще обстановка днем? Как по народу и тсд, что по работе? 👀

👎41💯1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC≈7,270 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ахааххпхп ну это вб, я не удивлен

💯36😭16🤝6

20 Jul 2026, 05:43 UTC≈6,780 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

БПЛА атаковали склады Wildberries в Подольске в Московской области 🥺 Сейчас буду мимо проезжать, посмотрю

🤝25😭153

18 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC≈7,200 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Чет жестко Проснулся, в 10 утра сегодня, а на небе тянется туча, хотя обещали солнечную погоду Оказалось что был прилет по складу вб Электросталь и Котовске и это дым от пожара, это пздц

😭443👎2🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC≈7,270 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пришли справки за год работы на озон 🤟 С 4 июля по 4 июля 25: 742к/96к налог 26: 510к/67 налог Вот и думайте :) Расходы выросли, а доход на уровне моего 2023 года на вб

🔥30🤝14💯10

4 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC≈6,890 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, сегодня я работаю ровно год на озончике 😢 Хотел приложить сколько я заработал, но жду справку 2ндфл с утра.. так ее и нет Терпим дальше 🤡

🔥35🤝53custom 54269835025601328672💯1

30 Jun 2026, 12:38 UTC≈7,010 views49 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня выходной 🍺 а это значит, что самое время начать делать то, чем я хочу заниматься изучаю базу, сценарии и тд Сложно. Потому что мозг атрофировался и профдеформировался уже от повторения одного и того же на складе Ну а кому легко 🚬

🤝32💯8🔥61custom 54269835025601328671custom 58618960141216679491

29 Jun 2026, 16:41 UTC≈5,770 views106 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Так зае*али эти склады.. чесслово 🙂 Дело даже не в физической усталости и малом заработке (дада в сравнении с кем-то это хорошо и тд), но и это тоже в малой ее части Уже почти 5 лет я вижу эти печальные, в какой-то мере поникшие лица на складе, которые не стремятся и их устраивает жить от квартиры до квартиры иии я становлюсь таким же ;( Ну короче, вся эта атмосфера начинает хавать меня 🔥 Да, заработка только и

💯65🤝21custom 586189601412166794910😭7🔥3

12 Jun 2026, 17:20 UTC≈6,810 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем ку 🔫 Как вы? Как лето? У меня все тихо, не спеша Я бы даже сказал очень скучно и ничего не происходит :( Пикаю по 5-6 чистыми в день за 8 часов и домой 👍

custom 542698350256013286745🔥18🤝9😭2💯1

23 May 2026, 20:01 UTC≈9,750 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Такая ситуация.. Будьте аккуратны 😢 Пздц🇷🇺

custom 586189601412166794934💯7🔥7

21 May 2026, 21:01 UTC≈9,510 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

+1 👍 Опоздание на 2 часа, потому что приезжаю к 11 Ранний уход, потому что иду переодеваться

🔥225💯4

17 May 2026, 06:46 UTC≈9,360 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто нибудь думал о переезде в другую страну? Или уже сделал это.. Типа Тайланда, Вьетнама мб 🤩

💯42😭138🔥6🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @skladckoy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“работаю на складе озон теперь / вб уволили” (@skladckoy), 6,281 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skladckoy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.