4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,798–4,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 06:36
4,801
-21
11 Aug 2026, 02:28
4,822
+1
8 Aug 2026, 12:02
4,821
+9
7 Aug 2026, 19:32
4,812
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.8%
avg views ÷ 4,801 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
24 (22 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
49,323
Reactions total
790
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
790 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
454
57.5%
💊
162
20.5%
🔥
136
17.2%
⚡
26
3.29%
🥰
11
1.39%
🤯
1
0.127%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 790reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ТОП ОШИБОК НОВИЧКОВ
1️⃣Слишком агрессивный дефицит БЕЗ РЕТЫ:
Такие люди режут калории до 1200-1300, думая, что быстрее похудеют))
Что получаем в итоге:
на деле вы запускаете адаптивный термогенез-организм замедляет метаболизм, падает NEAT, вы становитесь вялыми, мерзнете, теряете мышцы и перестаете худеть.
Оптимальный дефицит для НАТУРАЛЬНОЙ сушки (без глп агонистов) — 300-500 ккал от поддержания, не больше
Боитес…
🧠А ЧТО ВООБЩЕ ТАКОЕ GLP-1???
GLP-1 - это естественный кишечный гормон, который ваш организм выделяет после еды.
Он делает три ключевые вещи:
заставляет поджелудочную выбрасывать инсулин, блокирует выработку глюкагона (который поднимает сахар) и замедляет опорожнение желудка, чтобы вы дольше чувствовали сытость. Также он напрямую влияет на центры голода в мозге, снижая аппетит
▪️СВОЙ GLP-1 VS GLP-агонисты:
…
ТОП 5 ЖИРНЫХ СТРАН
Как правило тут преобладают страны где: культ переработанной, жирной и сладкой еды.
🇺🇸 США
Ну, я думаю тут никто не удивлен))
-огромное население, высококалорийная обработанная пища, большие порции, низкая ежедневная активность, автомобильная культура
Примерный рацион: бургеры, картофель фри, сладкие напитки, готовые блюда, снеки, завтраки с высоким содержанием сахара.
🇲🇽 МЕКСИКА
Сахаросодержа…
ТОП 5 СУХИХ СТРАН
🇻🇳 ВЬЕТНАМ
Рацион: рис, рыба, овощи, зелень, лапша, почти нет мяса. Жарят мало, едят свежие и ферментированные продукты.
Активность: рисовая уборка вручную, езда на велосипеде, ходьба - физическая работа встроена в повседневную жизнь (короче халявный NEAT)
🇹🇱 ВОСТОЧНЫЙ ТИМОР
Рацион: кукуруза, маниока, овощи, рыба, специи. Почти нет сахара и обработанной пищи.
Активность: сельское хозяйство, ручн…
💉ПОЧЕМУ МНОГИЕ МИКРОДОЗЯТ РЕТУ ДАЖЕ ПОСЛЕ ПОХУДЕНИЯ?
Многие воспринимают ретатрутид только как средство для быстрого похудения.
Но не многие знают, что есть отдельная категория людей, которые используют его в долгосрок, на микродозах👁🗨
🌟ЗАЧЕМ ОНИ ЭТО ДЕЛАЮТ?
Долгосрочный прием на низких дозах дает ряд эффектов, которые выходят далеко за рамки похудения
😄Улучшение чувствительности к инсулину и снижение жира в пече…
ЧТО ЮЗАЛ ДЖОРДАН БАРРЕТ/ДРУГИЕ МОДЕЛИ ДЛЯ СУШКИ?
🚬НИКОТИН+КОФЕИН:🍸
С 2017 года его регулярно фотографируют с сигаретой: в Нью-Йорке, на улицах Сиднея, на вечеринках))😁
Никотин — мощный подавитель аппетита и стимулятор липолиза, который используют ОЧЕНЬ многие модели, чтобы подавлять голод и ускорять метаболизм
Также он постоянно пьет кофе, которое действует не хуже никотина (если боитесь зависимости от никотина - и…
🖤КАК ВСЕГО 5% ЖИРА МЕНЯЮТ ЛИЦО
Посмотрите на эту лютую трансформацию Стэфана - разница между 17% и 11% жира в лице просто СУМАСШЕДШАЯ
Прикол в том, что скачок с 14-15% до 8-10% самый заметный в плане лица))
⛔️До 14-15% жира подкожная клетчатка лица содержит большое количество гиалуроновой кислоты и коллагена, которые удерживают воду.
-При 17% жира лицо выглядит жирным, даже если тело уже сухое
❗️ТОЛЬКО после 12% …
ОТВЕТЫ НА ВОПРОСЫ ЧАСТЬ 2
1️⃣Можно ли убрать жир локально, например, только с щек или живота? (без хирургии/липолитиков)
Нет. Жир уходит системно, а не по запросу.
-То, откуда он уйдет в первую очередь, зависит от генетики и количества альфа-2 рецепторов в этой зоне (единственное можешь попробовать йохимбин в сочетании с ретой, он действует на эти рецепторы)
👀Щеки и низ живота часто уходят в последнюю очередь именн…
ОТВЕТЫ НА ЧАСТЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ
1️⃣Сколько вообще стоит курс реты?
На месяц тебе понадобится около 5000₽, если начинать с нормальных дозировок (2-2.5мг)
Минимум - 3.500₽
-Это с учетом того, что ты не будешь брать оверпрайс с озона/вб или других каналах с завышенными ценами (бери только Х-бренд)
2️⃣Можно ли худеть подростку?
Нужно.
Твои зоны роста закроются ГОРАЗДО быстрее от высокой ароматизации андрогенов (больше бф=бо…
МАРАФОН БУДЕТ ТУТ…
До конца лета осталось 28 дней.
Я открываю набор на личное ведение, на котором я за месяц приведу твое тело и лицо в идеальное состояние путем снижения % жира (и не только)
Поскольку я не резиновый, места ограничены (всего 5 мест)
🦅ЧТО БУДЕТ?
-Мои личные ответы на твои вопросы 24/7
-Составлю личный план под тебя и твои цели (диета,активность и тд)
-Разберу твои анализы / скажу какие сдавать
-…
РЕАЛЬНО ЛИ ПРОСУШИТЬСЯ ЗА МЕСЯЦ??
Остался ровно месяц до конца лета, а 90% подписчиков канала еще не закончили сушку… (по результатам опроса)
😡БЕЗ РЕТЫ РЕАЛЬНО?
•Чтобы высушиться за месяц, нам нужно делать АГРЕССИВНЫЙ дефицит (1000 ккал +)
😁Только вот загвоздка в том, что без реты твой органзим сразу включит следующие механизмы:
-Упадет лептин (гормон насыщения)
-Вырастет грелин (гормон голода)
-Снизится Т3 (мета…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @skeleton_country. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@skeleton_country edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,117,010 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@skeleton_country named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@xbrand_peptide named in 20 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Skeleton Country” (@skeleton_country), 4,801 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skeleton_country.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.