Channel
@sjbss2
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
12,960subscribers
-886 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003809952514 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sjbss2 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 14 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sjbss2 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @sjbss2/465 · this entry14 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC | @sjbss1/46214 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sjbss2/470 · this entry14 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC | @sjbss1/46714 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sjbss2/471 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC | @sjbss1/46816 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sjbss1/46918 Jun 2026, 10:12 UTC | @sjbss2/472 · this entry18 Jun 2026, 10:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sjbss2/474 · this entry23 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC | @sjbss1/47123 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sjbss2/475 · this entry23 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC | @sjbss1/47223 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @sjbss1 | 16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9–7) |
| @sjbss3 | 16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @sjbss3 (11–5) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 June 2026 to 11 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @sjbss3. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 12,960 | -65 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 13,025 | -263 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 13,288 | -163 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 13,451 | -134 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 13,585 | -146 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 13,731 | -115 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 13,846 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
#世界杯：1/4决赛战报：西班牙2比1力克比利时 晋级四强，将与法国争夺决赛席位 7月11日，2026年世界杯四分之一决赛继续进行。在洛杉矶体育场展开的一场欧洲强强对话中，西班牙队凭借法比安·鲁伊斯和替补奇兵米克尔·梅里诺的进球，以2比1击败比利时队，成功挺进世界杯四强，将在半决赛迎战卫冕冠军法国队。 比赛开始后，西班牙依旧坚持控球打法，占据场上主动。第30分钟，法比安·鲁伊斯接队友传球后冷静推射破门，帮助西班牙取得1比0领先。面对落后的局面，比利时并未慌乱，第41分钟，查尔斯·德凯特拉雷抓住机会完成破门，将比分扳成1比1，双方带着平局进入中场休息。 下半场，两队攻防转换速度明显加快。西班牙不断通过亚马尔、奥尔莫等人的突破制造威胁，而比利时则依靠德布劳内和多库的快速反击寻找机会。不过比赛第67分钟，比利时门将库尔图瓦因伤无法坚持，被替补门将拉门斯换下，这也成为比赛的重要转折点。 比赛进入尾声，第88分钟，西班牙发动连续进…
世界杯八强全部出炉！西班牙、法国领跑争冠，阿根廷逆转晋级，挪威成最大黑马 随着2026年世界杯1/8决赛全部结束，本届世界杯八强正式产生。成功晋级八强的球队分别是：法国、摩洛哥、挪威、英格兰、西班牙、比利时、阿根廷和瑞士。四分之一决赛即将打响，世界杯冠军争夺战也进入最激烈的阶段。 本届世界杯淘汰赛至今，多支传统强队表现稳定，也有黑马球队不断创造惊喜。从整体发挥来看，西班牙、法国、英格兰和阿根廷依然是最受关注的争冠热门，而首次闯入八强的挪威则成为本届赛事最大的黑马。 西班牙无疑是目前状态最出色的球队之一。 在淘汰赛中，西班牙先后击败奥地利和葡萄牙，两场比赛展现出强大的控球能力和攻防转换效率。球队整体配合成熟，防守稳健，关键球员状态火热。如果能够在四分之一决赛淘汰比利时，西班牙将进一步接近决赛。 法国队依旧保持冠军竞争力。 作为世界足坛传统强队，法国凭借深厚的阵容实力和丰富的大赛经验一路稳步前进。球队在淘汰赛阶段攻守均衡，整…
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 西班牙 vs 奥地利 07/03 03:00 推荐：西班牙胜 全场：大2.5/3 让球：西班牙 -1.5/2 角球：大9.5 比分：3-0 3-1 葡萄牙 vs 克罗地亚 07/03 07:00 推荐：葡萄牙胜 全场：大2.5/3 让球：葡萄牙 -0.5/1 角球：大9 比分：2-1 3-1 瑞士 vs 阿尔及利亚 07/03 11:00 推荐：瑞士胜 全场：小2/2.5 让球：瑞士 -0.5 角球：小9 比分：1-0 1-1 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
‼️豪门晋级，黑马突围！淘汰赛精彩持续升级‼️ 🎆6月30日赛事战报 ： 🇧🇷 巴西 2:1 日本 稳扎稳打，成功挺进下一轮 🇵🇾 巴拉圭（点球4:3）德国 鏖战至点球大战，巴拉圭笑到最后 🇲🇦 摩洛哥（点球3:2）荷兰 黑马再创奇迹，成功锁定晋级席位 🥰7月1日焦点赛事： 科特迪瓦 vs 挪威 法国 vs 瑞典 墨西哥 vs 厄瓜多尔
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 南非 vs 加拿大 06/29 03:00 推荐：加拿大胜 全场：小2/2.5 让球：加拿大 -0.5/1 角球：大9.5 比分：1-2 1-3 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 巴拿马 vs 英格兰 06/28 05:00 推荐：英格兰胜 全场：大 3/3.5 让球：英格兰 -2/2.5 角球：大10 比分：0-4 1-4 克罗地亚 vs 加纳 06/28 05:00 推荐：克罗地亚胜 全场：大 2 让球：克罗地亚 -0.5 角球：大8.5 比分：2-1 1-1 哥伦比亚 vs 葡萄牙 06/28 07:30 推荐：葡萄牙胜 全场：大 2.5/3 让球：葡萄牙 -0.5 角球：小9 比分：1-2 1-3 刚果民主共和国 vs 乌兹别克斯坦 06/28 07:30 推荐：刚果民主共和国胜 全场：小2/2.5 让球：乌兹别克斯坦 +1 角球：大8.5 比分：1-1 1-0 阿尔及利亚 vs 奥地利 06/28 10:00 推荐：平局 全场：小1.5/2 让球：阿尔及利亚 +0/0.5 角球：大7.5 比分：0-0 1-1 约旦 vs…
6月27日赛果： 🇳🇴 挪威 1️⃣-4️⃣ 法国 🇫🇷 🇸🇳 塞内加尔 5️⃣-0️⃣ 伊拉克 🇮🇶 🇨🇻 佛得角 0️⃣-0️⃣ 沙特阿拉伯 🇸🇦 🇺🇾 乌拉圭 0️⃣-1️⃣ 西班牙 🇪🇸 🇪🇬 埃及 1️⃣-1️⃣ 伊朗 🇮🇷 🇳🇿 新西兰 1️⃣-5️⃣ 比利时 🇧🇪 😀6月28日赛程： 05:00 🇵🇦 巴拿马 🆚 英格兰 🏴 05:00 🇭🇷 克罗地亚 🆚 加纳 🇬🇭 07:30 🇨🇴 哥伦比亚 🆚 葡萄牙 🇵🇹 07:30 🇨🇩 刚果民主共和国 🆚 乌兹别克斯坦 🇺🇿 10:00 🇩🇿 阿尔及利亚 🆚 奥地利 🇦🇹 10:00 🇯🇴 约旦 🆚 阿根廷 🇦🇷
Photo, posted without a caption
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 挪威 vs 法国 06/27 03:00 推荐：平局 全场：小 3/3.5 让球：挪威 +1 角球：大9 比分：1-1 1-2 塞内加尔 vs 伊拉克 06/27 03:00 推荐：塞内加尔胜 全场：大3 让球：塞内加尔 -2 角球：小9 比分：3-1 4-1 佛得角 vs 沙特阿拉伯 06/27 08:00 推荐：佛得角胜 全场：大3 让球：佛得角 0 角球：大 8.5 比分：2-1 2-2 乌拉圭 vs 西班牙 06/27 08:00 推荐：佛得角胜 全场：大2/2.5 让球：西班牙 -0.5/1 角球：大9 比分：1-2 1-3 埃及 vs 伊朗 06/27 11:00 推荐：埃及胜 全场：大1.5/2 让球：埃及 -0/0.5 角球：小8 比分：1-1 2-1 新西兰 vs 比利时 06/27 11:00 推荐：比利时胜 全场：小3.5/4 让球：新西…
世界杯初盘推荐 —————————————-- 葡萄牙 vs 乌兹别克斯坦 06/24 01:00 推荐：葡萄牙胜 全场：大3-3.5 让球：葡萄牙 -2/2.5 比分：3-0 4-0 英格兰 vs 加纳 06/24 04:00 推荐：英格兰胜 全场：大3 让球：英格兰 -2 比分：3-0 3-1 巴拿马 vs 克罗地亚 06/24 07:00 推荐：克罗地亚胜 全场：大2.5/3 让球：克罗地亚 -1 比分：1-2 1-3 哥伦比亚 vs 刚果民主共和国 06/24 10:00 推荐：哥伦比亚胜 全场：大2.5/3 让球：哥伦比亚 -1 比分：2-1 3-1 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
#世界杯：今日战报 I组、J组第二轮全部结束，法国、阿根廷豪取两连胜，提前占据出线主动权。 🇦🇷 阿根廷 2-0 奥地利 阿根廷延续火热状态，以2-0击败奥地利，两战全胜，稳居J组前列。 🇫🇷 法国 3-0 伊拉克 法国攻防俱佳，凭借稳定发挥以3-0完胜伊拉克，豪取小组两连胜。 🇳🇴 挪威 3-2 塞内加尔 挪威与塞内加尔上演进球大战，最终挪威以3-2险胜，收获关键三分。 🇯🇴 约旦 1-2 阿尔及利亚 阿尔及利亚把握机会能力更胜一筹，以2-1力克约旦，保留晋级希望。 📊今日四场比赛共产生13粒进球，法国、阿根廷继续展现争冠实力，挪威赢下关键战，而阿尔及利亚则迎来本届世界杯首胜
🇺🇾 乌拉圭 VS 佛得角 🇨🇻 比赛时间：06月22日 06:00（北京时间） 让球盘口：乌拉圭 让球半（稳健单挑：让球胜；博高倍：让主胜/让平） 主流比分：2-0 3-0 3-1 防御防线：1-0 1-1 深度数据与战术复盘分析： 盘口强托防范：初盘普遍开出乌拉圭让一球/球半低水。由于乌拉圭首轮战平沙特表现沉闷，而佛得角展现出逼平西班牙的超级黑马韧性，导致下盘具备天然的吸金拉力。后市机构迅速变盘升至球半中水，在主队热度并未过载的情况下强行加压，表明数据端对乌拉圭的锋线红利有极强的风险防范。这种独门升盘彻底掐断了去往下盘的便宜筹码，上盘打出格局明朗。 高压逼抢与体能断层：乌拉圭中前场拥有顶级的运动能力和绞杀手段。佛得角虽然身体对抗不俗，但其战术素养在面对高强度的逼抢时极易连续传球失误。乌拉圭本场势必利用边路冲击和死球战术撕开防线。佛得角一旦在下半场体能进入瓶颈期，其中路防守断层将被乌拉圭的豪华锋线彻底打穿，乌拉圭赢球赢盘可期。…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sjbss2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“2026年世界杯预测赛事播报” (@sjbss2), 12,960 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sjbss2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.