Channel
@siyasatkade_ir
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,680subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001206264330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @siyasatkade_ir |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/siyasatkade_ir |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
9.2 average views per post against 1,680 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.548%. Across the 15,813 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 8.34% and 32.3%, with a median of 17.2%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 40 of 40 published in the window (40 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 368 |
| Mature posts only | 0.59% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,680 measured 10 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:fas · 15,813 channels · p10 3.91% · p25 8.34% · p50 17.2% · p75 32.3% · p90 53.6% |
| Position in cohort | 0.658th percentile · 1/31 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.172% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 97.5%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 1,680 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 1,681 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,681 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 368 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دستور ترامپ برای شناسایی عاملان افشای کمبود ذخائر تسلیحاتی آمریکا روزنامه والاستریت ژورنال: دونالد ترامپ در پی انتشار گزارشهای رسانهای درباره کاهش ذخایر مهمات آمریکا در جریان جنگ با ایران، دستور آغاز تحقیقات جدید برای شناسایی عاملان درز اطلاعات محرمانه پنتاگون را صادر کرده است. این اقدام در حالی صورت میگیرد که کاخ سفید همچنان اصرار دارد ارتش آمریکا از توان تسلیحاتی کافی برای هرگونه عملیات نظامی برخوردار است. ت…
حضور نیروهای یگان ویژه پلیس در محل سقوط هواگردهای آمریکایی داخل دشت مهیار اصفهان @siyasatkade_ir
📛به گزارش کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل، رومان گوفمن، رییس موساد، دو مقام ارشد این سازمان را به دلیل شکست طرح عملیاتی پیشنهادی آنها برای جمهوری اسلامی برکنار کرد. بر اساس این گزارش، رییس اداره اطلاعات و رییس بخش ایران موساد، دو مقامی هستند که از سمت خود برکنار شدند. کانال ۱۲ گزارش داد این طرح به رییسجمهوری آمریکا ارائه شده بود، اما در عمل به مرحله اجرا نرسید. @siyasatkade_ir
⛔رسانه آمریکایی MS NOW: عمان با چارچوب یک توافق موقت با ایران برای بازگشایی تنگه هرمز موافقت کرده است. هدف از این توافق، فراهم کردن زمینه برای برقراری آتشبس جدید و ازسرگیری مذاکرات هستهای میان آمریکا و ایران عنوان شده است. @siyasatkade_ir
ترامپ ریپست کرد :ترامپ جنگ ایران را برد @siyasatkade_ir
و چقدر شجاعانه ترسیدیم تنها یا با هم … @siyasatkade_ir
رویترز: تردد کشتیها از تنگه هرمز ۳۴ درصد کاهش یافت در فاصله دوشنبه تا پنجشنبه تنها ۳۳ شناور از این آبراه عبور کردند، در حالی که هفته گذشته این رقم ۵۰ فروند بود. تنها ۶ نفتکش این هفته از تنگه خارج شدهاند و با وجود تخفیف ۳۰ دلاری عراق برای هر بشکه، مالکان کشتیها همچنان از ورود به منطقه خودداری میکنند. این کاهش همزمان با مذاکرات ایران و عمان برای بازگشایی این آبراه استراتژیک که پیش از جنگ حدود یکپنجم نفت جهان ا…
خبرنگار الجزیره: سفر نخستوزیر پاکستان به عربستان در مقطعی حساس برای کل منطقه انجام میشود امنیت منطقهای نهتنها برای عربستان، بلکه برای ترکیه و پاکستان نیز اهمیت حیاتی دارد؛ دو کشوری که هر دو با ایران مرز مشترک دارند قدرتهای اصلی منطقه که توان نظامی، فناوری، انرژی و سرمایه مالی عربستان را با یکدیگر ترکیب میکنند، اکنون در حال همگرایی هستند؛ اقدامی مهم، بهویژه پس از تحولات ناشی از جنگ ایران @siyasatkade_ir
مجله تایم: وزارت دفاع آمریکا(پنتاگون) حدود ۴۰ میلیارد دلار برای جنگ با ایران هزینه کرده است @siyasatkade_ir
ترامپ عکس خودش کنار جاناف کندی را در کمپ دیوید منتشر کرد @siyasatkade_ir
آمریکا انتقال بخشی از سوخترسانهای خود را که در فرودگاه بنگوریون مستقر بودند، آغاز کرده کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل مدعی شد: نیروی هوایی آمریکا انتقال بخشی از هواپیماهای سوخترسان هوایی خود را که طی هفتههای اخیر در فرودگاه بنگوریون مستقر بودند، آغاز کرده است. @siyasatkade_ir
🔴ترامپ: به نظرم جنگ بهزودی پایان پیدا میکنه و بعیده شرایط فعلی برای مدت طولانی ادامه داشته باشه @siyasatkade_ir
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @siyasatkade_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,073,428 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سیاستکده” (@siyasatkade_ir), 1,680 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/siyasatkade_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.