Channel
@sitoshidefi10000x
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,344subscribers
-159 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002282915686 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sitoshidefi10000x |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sitoshidefi10000x |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 3,344 | -54 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 3,398 | -49 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 3,447 | -54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 3,501 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 3,503 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 3,503 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
rasmr is on a generational run rn ran up half a mil from conviction on the hype trade. then 5k → 100k on fomo live on stream. then tripled it over a few days in $gme, $pons, $marscoin etc. every cycle one character gets touched by something you can’t explain. rn that’s him. rasmr won the wsop solana shootout today and called it luck himself - after going all in blind on the flop with the worse hand possible but ju…
JUST IN: Michael Burry says the stock market is "near a major top, and possible a 1987-type fall." @WatcherGuru
John Dog bought a bag into $John heard decent team DYOR Filed inside Robinhood's own official docs, sitting there the entire time the app has been live. Millions of people opened Robinhood, millions signed up, and nobody ever scrolled far enough to see the name on file: John Dog. This isn't fan art. Robinhood created it themselves and left it there in plain sight for years. Now it's onchain. $JOHN, paired with tok…
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump administration refunds $100,000,000,000 in tariffs following Supreme Court ruling. @WatcherGuru
The original “Send It” legend is here on Robinhood Chain. - $LARRY - 223k Not another dog or cat in a suit. This is REAL culture. A decade-old meme that became everyday crypto language. Traders don’t read whitepapers… they hear something and SLAP THE SWAP BUTTON. Larry doesn’t do TA. Larry doesn’t check charts. Larry just SENDS IT. Original hand-drawn art, running gags, multi-part stories — actual personality, not…
Robinhood $HOOD The people's chain deserves the people's coin. HOOD6900 isn't a token it's 50M hood warriors united to flip Robinhood on NASDAQ. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x8072fa4312Fc5be3e19425a860a9Ecb39463DFD8 https://hood6900.com/ https://x.com/hood6900coin https://t.me/HOOD6900Portal 0x25824447ED0E26B0741858b67065bB6BD0017B15 DYOR/NFA...
HOODRAT - MATT FURIE'S BAT FROM THE NIGHT RIDERSE VERY CHAIN NEEDS A BILLION DOLLAR MATT FURIE RUNNER. MEET $HOODRAT ON ROBINHOOD. EVERY CHAIN HAS ITS OWN MATT FURIE MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR RUNNER. ETH HAD $PEPE ETH HAD $ANDY BASE HAD $BRETT SOL HAD $BIRDDOG BIDDING $HOODRAT HERE WILL BE OBVIOUS IN HINDSIGHT. 0xE392a881491771430082391EFc58db55709Dd7a5 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xD5278381d510C134C94AEb35…
Bought some bag here SOL | $AE looks good volume and also Ticker. Dyor https://dexscreener.com/solana/4paeg8wy1wkm5xwvuatazzw9dduaaqf3prgkxhqbeqv2 6RfknWcRCQrCfYhV2vtHLb1eTeknqF6NG46RkYzHpump https://ansem.exchange/ https://x.com/AnsemExchange/status/2074197440480317494
🪶 $Cashcat Aped this on Robinhood chain, just saw dexscreener added it https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xa70fc67c9f69da90b63a0e4c05d229954574e313 Kinda high, at ATH of 1M around rn, but i think lore is good. https://x.com/vladtenev/status/1382390320663560197?s=20 https://playground.li.fi/?fromChain=1&fromToken=0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000&toChain=4663&toToken=0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000…
https://x.com/cobratate/status/2072096209091850741?s=46 Andrew Tate teasing. Bought some $TATE CuGJf6cfDfMh4UxVgNJ5KFQ6v8Wv3qrqop6cFKsGpump
DCA’d more yilongma here he just posted on his tiktok with 1.4m followers about yilongma coin and dogecoin Already 1000 views in 5 mins, could get very viral 0x3AdD95b59415a95db0a546d8e7E49CA06BC77946
Elon stated he wants to meet up with yilongma yilongma endorses the coin fully team getting Elon’s friends to post about him and tagging Elon when Elon engages it runs to 100m+ not some random coin 0x3AdD95b59415a95db0a546d8e7E49CA06BC77946
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sitoshidefi10000x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 639,366 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sitoshi Alpha Vault ⛩️” (@sitoshidefi10000x), 3,344 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sitoshidefi10000x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.