13 Aug 2022, 06:45 UTC≈19,700 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s580/sh/2e6e0e69-531b-4d40-a028-57025815ffc0/af65a9cc50340c47e63eedbc9fdf175d
❤15👍12😁2
Channel
Surbhi Singla, AIR 75
@singla_surbhi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,099subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001549184962 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @singla_surbhi |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 9 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/singla_surbhi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 2,099 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 2,098 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 2,102 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 2,102 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 53s
- Average length
- 1m 53s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
464 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 264 | 56.9% | |
| 🤬 | 59 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 10.8% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 4.96% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 3.45% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 2.59% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 2.16% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 1.51% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 1.51% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.51% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.29% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.647% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2022 to 13 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
1 Aug 2022, 17:11 UTC≈16,900 views135 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @csp20infoVideo
Hello everyone, I gave a mock interview at Drishti and was allotted Vijendra Chauhan's panel. He continuously pointed out to me that I can't be an IFS since I'm a Dalit. He tried to force me to accept that IFS is not made for the dalits as it's elite. He further said that "arrogance is hallmark of IFS" prove me wrong. I don't know whether these things are even allowed to say in the interview. Then when the Drishti…
🤬59👍24😢23💩10🤯6😁5🥰4🤩2
12 Jul 2022, 09:30 UTC≈17,100 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
I've received multiple queries regarding my correct attempt and final score in Mathematics across attempts. Here's it to the best of my estimate: 1st attempt (2018): ~280 correct attempt. Final score: 180 2nd attempt: Didn't qualify prelims 3rd attempt (2020) ~340 correct attempt. Final score : 195 (scaling was higher in this year) 4th attempt (2021) ~420 correct attempt. Score : 296
👍38👏10❤7🙏7
11 Jul 2022, 12:12 UTC≈16,800 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Strategy for Mathematics 1. At first, I completed 3-4 revisions of IMS notes for all the topics. 2. After having gained some confidence on syllabus coverage, I went on the next step, i.e. making short notes for each topic. I contracted IMS notes into a thin 50-60 page register for each topic, for purposes of final revision. These contained all theorems, proofs of important theorems and one solved example of each type…
👍31🔥4
11 Jul 2022, 12:09 UTC≈12,800 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Mathematics: I scored 296 in mathematics in this attempt. There was a jump of more than 100 marks in my mathematics scores between the 3rd and 4th attempts. I followed IMS notes for almost all topics in Mathematics. For some chapters, I supplemented them with other sources: 1. For Real analysis, looked at solved examples from Malik and Arora partially, especially in sequences and series. 2. For Statics and Dynamics, …
👍24
10 Jul 2022, 11:46 UTC≈11,400 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
For topics like Governance, International relations, Security, Society and Disaster Management, I did not refer to any static source. I followed a dynamic approach based on PYQs for these topics: 1. Analysis of PYQ papers theme-wise to identify the kind of questions being asked. For example, in IR, there are generally 3-4 patterns on which questions are asked: i) India's bilateral relations/historical evolution of t…
👍33🔥2🥰2❤1🤩1
10 Jul 2022, 04:28 UTC≈10,500 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Answer writing and test series for Mains: 1. Initially, I used IASBaba's TLP initiative to practice daily answer writing. I would write 3-4 answers daily, and then go through other people's answers on the platform to improve mine and add good points from them to my notes. At this stage, I would take around 20-25 minutes to write an answer and about 2 hours for the entire process. I would do this 5 days a week. Follow…
👍34❤3🥰1
9 Jul 2022, 14:22 UTC≈9,570 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Test series for prelims: 1. SFG by FORUMIAS (Helped inculcate discipline in solving half a paper each day at 7 am in the morning) 2. VisionIAS test series (Solved fully in my earlier attempts. Left initial sectional tests in the 3rd and 4th attempts) 3. NextIAS - 20 tests (solved insights instead of this in earlier attempts) (Any test series is good enough, as long as you're solving some 40-50 tests along with going…
👍20👏3
9 Jul 2022, 14:19 UTC≈9,470 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Current sources: 1. Hindu Newspaper 2. Insights Daily current affairs 3. Vision's Monthly magazines (or PT365 and Mains365)
👍9
9 Jul 2022, 14:16 UTC≈9,640 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Static Sources: (Common for Prelims and Mains) GS1: 1. Modern History: Spectrum 2. Ancient and Medieval: New NCERTs 3. Art and culture: Nitin Singhania, Art and culture NCERT, 12th 4.Geography: NCERTs of class 11th and 12th - Physical and Economic Grography of India and the World 5. ARC Report on Disaster Management 6. Vision's PDF on World History GS2: 1. Laxmikanth for Polity GS3: 1. Mrunal's PDF notes for econom…
👍24🔥5
9 Jul 2022, 07:50 UTC≈8,990 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
With this, done with uploading all GS notes.
❤14👍4👏2🔥1
9 Jul 2022, 07:50 UTC≈9,410 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s580/sh/a422fd66-4f8d-4ff9-a57f-ee77ee5e63c0/674c06dd6dff9065cf7938fa7909f759
👍4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @singla_surbhi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 711,637 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Surbhi Singla, AIR 75” (@singla_surbhi), 2,099 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/singla_surbhi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.