Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SINA WHALE | SM🩸

Channel

SINA WHALE | SM🩸

@sina_Whale

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

222,102subscribers

-10,871 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002054482047
TypeChannel
Username@sina_Whale
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sina_Whale

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

222,102232,973227,537.521 August 2026 — 232,973 subscribers23 August 2026 — 232,202 subscribers24 August 2026 — 231,151 subscribers25 August 2026 — 230,421 subscribers26 August 2026 — 229,405 subscribers28 August 2026 — 228,603 subscribers28 August 2026 — 227,731 subscribers29 August 2026 — 226,835 subscribers31 August 2026 — 226,000 subscribers31 August 2026 — 225,376 subscribers1 September 2026 — 224,709 subscribers2 September 2026 — 224,294 subscribers4 September 2026 — 223,698 subscribers7 September 2026 — 222,102 subscribers21 August 20267 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 16 days, net -10,871. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 220,471–234,604 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 04:41222,102-1,596
4 Sept 2026, 09:19223,698-596
2 Sept 2026, 23:56224,294-415
1 Sept 2026, 23:53224,709-667
31 Aug 2026, 23:58225,376-624
31 Aug 2026, 01:14226,000-835
29 Aug 2026, 23:34226,835-896
28 Aug 2026, 22:58227,731-872
28 Aug 2026, 01:26228,603-802
26 Aug 2026, 23:05229,405-1,016
25 Aug 2026, 21:37230,421-730
24 Aug 2026, 20:54231,151-1,051
23 Aug 2026, 03:24232,202-771
21 Aug 2026, 23:45232,973first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.96%
avg views ÷ 222,102 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,350
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held46 (14 August 20266 September 2026)
Views total200,211
Reactions total12,099
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

12,099 reactions across 46 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,14250.8%
👍2,98124.6%
🔥1,47612.2%
💔4944.08%
🐳3042.51%
😍2792.31%
🤣2401.98%
🤔1831.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,099 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 46 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sina_Whale. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 02:59 UTC781 views128 reactionsread 7 September 2026

دو روزی که غیب بودم، مارکت عملاً حرکت خاصی نداشت و فقط یک رنج خسته‌کننده و اعصاب‌خردکن داشت؛ برای همین ترجیح دادم خودم هم کمی از بازار فاصله بگیرم و استراحت کنم 🧠❤️‍🔥 گاهی بهترین ترید، ترید نکردنه حالا با انرژی برگشتم و به امید خدا این هفته قراره برای سینا وال خیلی متفاوت و جذاب باشه. 🐋🔥

72👍32🔥24

1 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,920 views758 reactionsread 7 September 2026

انهدام دکل مخابراتی سیریک

321👍157🔥118😍70💔48🤔44

1 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,790 views676 reactions3 Starsread 7 September 2026

🚨لنگرود انفجار های پیاپی و متعدد

283👍202😍110💔62🤔19

1 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC≈3,720 views510 reactionsread 7 September 2026

امریکا به جنوب حمله هوایی کرده ❌

223👍176🔥111

1 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC≈3,880 views413 reactionsread 7 September 2026

درود صبح همگی بخیر 🌹

212👍201

31 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈4,240 views475 reactionsread 7 September 2026

با توجه به فشارهای بین‌المللی و شرایط فعلی، محدوده ۲۰۰ هزار تومان می‌تونه یکی از کف‌های مهم دلار باشه از اینجا به بعد احتمالاً باید خودمون رو برای نوسانات سنگین‌تر آماده کنیم؛ نوسان‌های ۱۰ هزار تومانی دیگه عجیب نخواهد بود. 💔 واقعیت اینه که ما همه سوار یک کشتی هستیم ؛ چه دیر، چه زود اثر این شرایط به تمام اقشار جامعه می‌رسه ! پس به‌جای ترس، آماده باشیم 🐋 SinaWall | Crypto signal

217👍137🐳80💔38🔥3

31 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈3,520 views338 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

💵 دلار ۲۱۰ هزار تومان؛ این یعنی یک واقعیت ساده: درآمد دلاری دیگه فقط یک مزیت نیست، برای خیلی‌ها تبدیل به یک ضرورت شده. 📈 اما یک نکته مهم: درآمد دلاری بدون دانش = ریسک دلاری! ⚠️ SinaWall | Crypto signal

153👍106🔥78💔1

30 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈3,560 views259 reactionsread 7 September 2026

#فوری 🔺برخی منابع خبر شلیک موشک، از ایران را دادند @sina_Whale

130👍76🔥53

29 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC≈3,730 views298 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Poll

فردا تحلیل دلار و طلا بریم ؟

  1. اره سینا حتما ✅85%
  2. نه نیازی نیست ‼️15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

141👍82🔥47🐳16💔12

29 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC≈2,910 views305 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🔥 هیچ رؤیای بزرگی با انگیزه‌ی نصفه‌نیمه ساخته نمی‌شود اگر چیزی را واقعاً می‌خواهی، باید تمام‌قد پایش بایستی با اشتیاق شروع کن، با انضباط ادامه بده و وقتی سخت شد، قوی‌تر شو؛ نه متوقف موفقیت سهم کسی نیست که فقط آرزو می‌کند؛ سهم کسی است که آن‌قدر باور، انرژی و استمرار دارد که حتی وقتی هیچ‌کس نتیجه را نمی‌بیند، خودش ادامه می‌دهد 🐋🔥 بزرگ فکر کن. محکم حرکت کن. تا آخر برو. ⌛️ روزی می‌رسه که تمام این سختی‌ها ارزشش رو ثابت

149👍99😍43🐳14

29 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈2,130 views199 reactionsread 7 September 2026

دلار فردایی تهران ⏳ 206,200 فروش🔴

101👍61🔥24🐳13

29 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC≈2,520 views223 reactionsread 7 September 2026

رفقا صبح شنبه همگی بخیر ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

123😍49🐳26🔥17👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @sina_Whale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTCAnonymous Poll126 voters

فردا تحلیل دلار و طلا بریم ؟

  1. اره سینا حتما ✅85%
  2. نه نیازی نیست ‼️15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

Btc ?

  1. Bye📈46%
  2. Sell📉57%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SINA WHALE | SM🩸” (@sina_Whale), 222,102 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sina_Whale.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.