🟩词条: #hz_cc_2025 ✈️: @hz_cc_2025 👩#老师 https://t.me/shudongphoto/1988 蝙蝠侠装客观说时念念和乐乐涨价,他的cc涨价了就不提了 15-20-23,涨价幅度比时念念和乐乐可大多了 @hz_cc_2025 涨价烂鸡 15p-20p-23p,涨了800
👍5❤1

Channel
@shudongbaike4
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,443subscribers
+80 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003248981068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shudongbaike4 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shudongbaike4 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 2,443 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 2,435 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 2,433 | +27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 2,406 | +10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 2,396 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,389 | +15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 2,374 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 2,366 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 2,363 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 49.3% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 17.3% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟩词条: #hz_cc_2025 ✈️: @hz_cc_2025 👩#老师 https://t.me/shudongphoto/1988 蝙蝠侠装客观说时念念和乐乐涨价,他的cc涨价了就不提了 15-20-23,涨价幅度比时念念和乐乐可大多了 @hz_cc_2025 涨价烂鸡 15p-20p-23p,涨了800
👍5❤1
🟩词条: #sunnygirl11111 ✈️: @sunnygirl11111 🐶#狗推 1.yj群著名自恋狂,自拍当头像,群里天天转发自己的几个聊天记录,一张图发十次,就是想大家夸他建模怪,被无数群友吐槽过了 2.疑似娜扎狗推代聊,1000p就在吹娜扎,1200p涨价消息很早就在群里试探,最近娜扎出了好几条差评试图在群里引导 3.疑似yuki狗腿代聊,嘴上说没去过天天群里转发动态增加热度
❤3👏3
🟩词条: #kioy33 ✈️: @kioy33 👩#老师 小懒本人照片
🤮7🤔3🥰2👏1
🟩词条: #keke9953 ✈️: @keke9953 👩#老师 阿拉蕾(@keke9953)这个死骗子,以及EC聊天室里那堆经常在群里活跃吹捧阿拉蕾的人(包括走地鸡,菠萝超人,3天饿9顿等人),就是一个诈骗团伙,包装“阿拉蕾”这个老师账号,然后写报告,上当的狼友约阿拉蕾先是给定,然后发微信收款码让你付定,但目的地之后要狼友扫微信付款码付完尾款删完聊天记录再上楼,一旦删完之后,就马上注销换号(ID还是一样的,这里我不太清楚用了啥黑科技)翻脸不认人,然后去EC聊天室对线,这时候这群诈骗团伙就出来维护这个“阿拉蕾”了这个群里的人太可怕了感觉像进了园区被连环套,本狼友自认倒大霉交了学费,但还是希望不要有免其他兄弟被骗
💩3❤2👎1
🟩词条: #Ccheng56 ✈️: @Ccheng56 👩#老师 反差宝地址 黄山锦庭 2号楼 9楼?7楼? 进过道最左边一间
❤6😁1
🟩词条: #@xiaotuanxi ✈️: @@xiaotuanxi 🤡#群主 史努比,深大研究生通过给频道刷粉刷浏览量群刷假粉诈骗中介和老师的钱财用户出击挥霍(一个研究生居然做出这种事)
❤3
🟧词条: #miaomiaochunyu ✈️: @miaomiaochunyu 🐔#鸡头 妙妙代聊黑心史,在树洞蹭时念念懒懒佑一热度拉踩,威胁自聊老师时念念佑一等,还在树洞狂言说自聊老师不给推广就等着被点,时念念拒绝给他手下妹子在频道推广把他拉黑后一直在树洞硬黑各大自聊老师,还在机器人继续骚扰自聊老师,各大狼友反馈抽成四成,被老师挂频道扒皮后就注销了账号
❤3😁1
🟧词条: #miaomiaochunyu ✈️: @miaomiaochunyu 🐔#鸡头 妙妙代聊黑心史,在树洞蹭时念念懒懒佑一热度拉踩,威胁自聊老师时念念佑一等,还在树洞狂言说自聊老师不给推广就等着被点,时念念拒绝给他手下妹子在频道推广把他拉黑后一直在树洞硬黑各大自聊老师,还在机器人继续骚扰自聊老师,各大狼友反馈抽成四成,被老师挂频道扒皮后就注销了账号
👍3💩1🤮1
🟩词条: #miaomiaochunyu ✈️: @miaomiaochunyu 🐔#鸡头 妙妙四月开课,代聊着急怕没生意在树洞打广告蹭时念念热度,蹭热度威胁不成,说要点了自聊老师时念念,被自聊老师截屏发频道后,还妄想在树洞洗白继续搞热度,不然四月开课没生意了,好几位狼友偷偷的曝光过妙妙代聊抽成一半,好黑心啊!
👍5
🟩词条: #ruyi618 ✈️: @ruyi618 👩#老师 之前开在浦西,现在位置换掉了 频道里的照片完全是假照,真人就是个lcp fw非常非常敷衍,啥都没有 fw起来像个死鱼
❤9
🟩词条: #qiqioTVTJK ✈️: @qiqioTVTJK 👩#老师 骗子
🟩词条: #YaoYao5006 ✈️: @YaoYao5006 🧑💻#代聊 @YaoYao5006 黑中介控制的小妹 到我第十个,下体被干出血了 强行要小妹接完,求求各位中介开开灯太黑了,我要看不见了🥹
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shudongbaike4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 853,381 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@shudongbaike4 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“树洞百科Wiki” (@shudongbaike4), 2,443 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shudongbaike4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.