Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сходка в Сейфе

Channel

Сходка в Сейфе

@shodka_v_seife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,559subscribers

-383 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744881668
TypeChannel
Username@shodka_v_seife
DescriptionЗвʼязок: @Shodkaua_bot чи [email protected]
Created21 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shodka_v_seife

Growth

29,55929,94229,750.56 August 2026 — 29,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,924 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,906 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,865 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,838 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,805 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,768 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,750 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,711 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,668 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,601 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,559 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -383. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,502–29,999 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:0429,559-42
16 Aug 2026, 15:1329,601-67
14 Aug 2026, 20:1729,668-43
13 Aug 2026, 14:0829,711-39
12 Aug 2026, 16:1429,750-18
11 Aug 2026, 17:0729,768-37
10 Aug 2026, 13:4229,805-33
9 Aug 2026, 11:0129,838-27
8 Aug 2026, 09:3329,865-41
7 Aug 2026, 11:4729,906-18
6 Aug 2026, 14:1029,924-18
6 Aug 2026, 02:3029,942no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:2829,942first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,260
Videos
197
Links
140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 51s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,365 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮1,58929.6%
🤣1,36425.4%
🤡73213.6%
😁5219.71%
💩4658.67%
🤬4157.74%
1242.31%
😈360.671%
👍310.578%
🤯270.503%
🌭210.391%
🔥150.28%
👏60.112%
😡60.112%
😍50.093%
👎40.075%
🥰30.056%
😘10.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,365reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
168
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 17 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shodka_v_seife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 15 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jun 2026, 16:15 UTC≈12,600 views212 reactions5 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Євгенію, та досить нам вже показувати свою бороду! Перший кластер переговорів для вступу в ЄС відкрито! Не соромимося своєї натури 🏳️‍🌈🩷

😁122🤮63🤡128💩5😈2

12 Jun 2026, 13:05 UTC≈16,500 views201 reactions11 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Андрій Насіковський купив собі підробний Audemars Piguet у надії переконати нас, що він не нікчема. Що він не той, у кого дружина народила дитину від Валерія Созановського 🙈

🤣158💩314🤡4👏3😈1

11 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC≈13,800 views316 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Що не день, то нова гендер-паті. Черговий король влаштовує свято, щоб відзначити появу майбутнього спадкоємця. Так дніпропетровський бізнесмен Олександр Гузенко та його нова дружина Маргарита Паша Міс Україна відсвяткували в Сен-Тропе новину про те, що в них буде хлопчик. Щоправда, об’єктивніше буде сказати, що святкувала саме Маргарита Паша, адже за виглядом Олександра Гузенка важко було сказати, що йому взагалі б

🤮191😁63💩3017🤡10🤣3🥰2

10 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC≈11,200 views279 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Нового коханця шукає активно і Євген Пронін. Гераскевич не підійшов? 🤷🏼‍♂️ Такими темпами ми вступимо до ЄС раніше терміну 🤗🏳️‍🌈

😁179💩48🤣29🤮163🤬2🌭1😍1

9 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC≈11,700 views309 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Гордон ревнує, що в Романа Скрипіна новий коханець. Нехай не засмучується — якщо поголити Олесю Бацман, то буде схожа.

🤣256😁21🤮185🤡4🌭3💩2

8 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈11,600 views265 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Естафету розкоші підхопив Ігор Маляр, найкращий друг Сергія Філімонова, комбата «Rolex». Після скандалу з викраденням людини та її побиттям, після скандалу з розкішними речами та коштовностями, до Філімонова хоч і запізно, але все ж дійшло, що з демонстрацією розкоші варто трохи зачекати й не виставляти її напоказ. Не втрималися хіба що під час організації розкішного свята — гендер-паті для майбутньої дитини. Особ

🤮187💩25😁2010🤡7😈6🤣4👍2

4 Jun 2026, 12:36 UTC≈15,700 views293 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Заздріть, що в перші дні літа у Катерини Філатовоі вже почався відпочинок на європейських узбережжях з новою колекцією Шанель. Татко що марно наворував?

🤮180🤬50🤯209🤡9🤣9👍8💩6

3 Jun 2026, 12:26 UTC≈28,000 views444 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Сфоткай, наче я на війні, а не в Київській області

🤡262🤮100🤣60👍7💩6😈54

2 Jun 2026, 14:21 UTC≈13,700 views218 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Ми думали Олександр Гузенко покинув дружину заради міски, а виявилося заради шамаханської принцеси: онучки Алі Паша 👸🤪

🤡126😁43💩26🤮137🤣3

28 May 2026, 17:37 UTC≈33,300 views437 reactions100 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Комбат Побрякушка, який просто інформаційно знищений після скандалу з викраденням і побиттям невинної людини його батальйоном «Вовки Да Вінчі», вирішив не ховатися по норах, щоб перечекати таку ганьбу, а продовжує жити розкішним життям і влаштовувати шикарні свята. Одне з них — гендер-паті з нагоди вагітності його дружини та загальної радості з того, що буде хлопчик. Воно й зрозуміло: такий аристократичний рід пот

🤣182💩133🤬57🤮42🤡8😈86👍1

22 May 2026, 09:13 UTC≈30,800 views439 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Батько двох громадян Америки Володимир Омелян, який робить все, щоб жоден з його дітей не жив в Україні, змусив нас плакати від історії про Шухевича в вишиванці…

🤣261🤮120🤡45👎4💩3😈3😍2🤯1

13 May 2026, 18:51 UTC≈33,900 views286 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Ми не проти гомосексуалістів… Ми не проти гомосексуалістів…

🤡159🤮70😁359💩9🤬4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shodka_v_seife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 444,123 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сходка в Сейфе” (@shodka_v_seife), 29,559 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shodka_v_seife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.