Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Павел Шерер

Channel

Павел Шерер

@shererpro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,300subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391622314
TypeChannel
Username@shererpro
Created12 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shererpro

Growth

1,3001,3041,3026 August 2026 — 1,304 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,304 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,303 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,302 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,304 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,302 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,300 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,299–1,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 01:551,300-2
23 Aug 2026, 23:351,302-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:021,304+2
16 Aug 2026, 17:371,302-1
13 Aug 2026, 13:261,303-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:171,304no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:531,304first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.8%
avg views ÷ 1,300 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (1 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total773
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6934.5%
5125.5%
👍4321.5%
🫡94.50%
👏84.00%
😁84.00%
🙏73.50%
🎉42.00%
🤓10.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 16 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shererpro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC87 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Залетаем https://telemost.yandex.ru/j/5576120574 Темы: UX, системный дизайн, ai-аненты и всякое такое

🎉2

5 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC206 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Завтра общий сбор, проверьте календари

4🔥2🫡2

29 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC480 views16 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Ну что, доживаем последние деньки в телеге, как считаете? Пока ещё всё работает, хочу вам сообщить о хорошей новости: я снова объявляю набор на менторство. Больше года прошло со времени последнего набора, у меня стали освобождаться слоты — посему велкам. Почему менторство, что это, какие условия и что что я могу дать — тут и ниже. Делитесь, наверняка кому-то окажется полезно. UPD: пишите @mashavanassi, она органи

🔥76👏2🎉1

22 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC592 views25 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

JTBD → Job Story → Иерархия целей → Opportunity Landscape → Personas → Механика → User Story → Проверка результата Новая статья в цикле про персон и JTBD. Теперь о том, почему даже приличная User Story может аккуратно описывать совершенно не ту задачу. Команды часто путают потребность с механикой: пользователю якобы нужен дашборд, уведомление, автоскейлер или очередная форма. Хотя на самом деле ему нужно, чтобы про

12🔥7👍4👏2

13 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC679 views5 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Мой хороший друг ищет девлида, вот вакансия: # Руководитель разработки/техлид Ищем руководителя разработки/техлида в проект в сфере API программ лояльности. Продукт на стадии работающего MVP (клиенты и план развития минимум на пару лет - в наличии). Заниматься нужно техническим управлением разработкой: развитием архитектуры, инфраструктуры и в целом работой команды. Оплата - от 300.000 рублей в месяц. ## Чем пре

🔥4🙏1

9 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC735 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Общий анализ Внимательно проанализируй содержимое репозитория на предмет: - Наличия потенциальных уязвимостей и слабых мест в безопасности. - Качества общей архитектуры и программных решений. - Согласованности функций, компонентов, модулей, методов API и прочего. - Наличия избыточной и дублирующей функциональности и логики, методов API и прочего. - Идемпотентность операций (API, БД, кэш и прочее). - Оптимизации и быс

👍8🔥32

9 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC686 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ARCHITECTURE.md # Задача Создай (или обнови, если уже существует) файл `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`. # Вводные `ARCHITECTURE.md` — это живой архитектурный документ, описывающий текущее фактическое состояние системы. Это не vision-документ и не roadmap. Он фиксирует реальную архитектуру, отражённую в коде и инфраструктуре. # Требования к содержанию `ARCHITECTURE.md` Документ обязан содержать следующие разделы: 1. Syst

👍8🫡32

9 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC611 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ну и вот вам ещё парочка пропмтов, которые я использую с Codex регулярно. Каждый из них, разумеется, нужно допиливать под конкретную задачу и особенности проекта. В одно сообщение не влезло, ловите несколько: AGENTS.md # Задача Создай (или обнови) в корне репозитория файл AGENTS.md, который станет исчерпывающей шпаргалкой для дальнейшей автоматизации. Документ должен рождаться из самого кода: прежде чем писать, проа

👍8🙏32

9 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC560 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Решил я поставить эксперимент: запилить редизайн своего сайта полностью на Open AI Codex. Без дизайна, референсов и единой строчки самостоятельно написанного кода. Ну а где редизайн, там и с нуля написанная тема, современная и с кучей плюшек, которые я раньше закрывал сторонними плагинами. Задачка не особо простая, как мне тогда казалось. Сказать, что я охренел будет слишком мягко. Всего за 4 вечера шаблон был полн

🔥134😁3🙏2👍1

4 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC583 views11 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Неплохой выпуск моей любимой Подлодки про найм в эпоху AI: как процесс поменялся и продолжает меняться, какие специалисты становятся востребованны, а каким пора изучать работу кассового аппарата в Пятёрочке. Довольно сильно пересекается с темой нашей последней встречи. Рекомендую всем, кто нанимается или нанимает

5👍4🔥1🙏1

2 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC577 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Залетаем через 5 минут: https://telemost.yandex.ru/j/3874032669

🫡41

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @shererpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jun 2026, 11:37 UTCFinal Results55 voters

Поговорим же?

  1. Да (созвонимся)51%
  2. Нет (я почитаю лучше)51%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Павел Шерер” (@shererpro), 1,300 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shererpro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.