Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Sheikalova
@sheikalova
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,216subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001352259630 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sheikalova |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sheikalova |
Topic
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 1,216 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 1,219 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 1,222 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 1,227 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,232 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 1,236 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 1,239 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 1,241 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 1,244 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 1,247 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:29 | 1,247 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 27s
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2025 to 22 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Bun, mau tanya.. 1 Di usia berapa mulai ngajarin anak praktek puasa di bulan Ramadhan? 2 Kenapa di usia tersebut? Nomor 1 kayanya cukup mudah ya jawabnya.. Nah gimana dengan nomor 2? Btw, apakah lebih cepat mengajarkan anak puasa dan ibadah lainnya itu LEBIH BAIK? 🤔 Kalau Bunda udah tau jawabannya Alhamdulillah banget 🥰 Tapi kalau jawabannya masih tanpa dasar dan ikut-ikutan, aduh jangan ya 🥺 Kalau begitu, anak…
❤2
Posted without readable text
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Bun ada yang udah menjelang mengenalkan atau mengajarkan anaknya puasa kah di Ramadhan kali ini? Atau mungkin ada yang sudah mengajarkan dari sebelumnya tapi anak masih belum bisa full tanpa iming-iming reward? Bentar-bentar memangnya, kapan waktu yang tepat mengenalkan dan mengajarkan puasa Ramadhan ke anak? 🤔 Hhhmmm jangan-jangan selama ini dari waktu nya aja udah keliru? 🫣 Terus nih, menurut bunda-bundi, mana …
👍1
📢 FLASH SALE RAYNE DRESS! 📢 Hanya hari ini, dapatkan Rayne Dress dengan harga spesial! Jangan sampai ketinggalan kesempatan langka ini🤩 Untuk pemesanan atau informasi lebih lanjut, langsung hubungi Cs Lita👉 https://wa.me/6282317280380
Yuk yang mau tanya atau sharing insight nya silahkan di kolom komentar, aku standby sampai jam 17 yaaa
Dan ya apa yang sesuai fitrah itu selaras dengan kebutuhan dan kemampuan tubuh kita. Di usia sebelum 7 tahun anak masih perlu banyak asupan gizi dan bisa jadi di kondisi tertentu atau anak tertentu berpuasa penuh kurang baik malah untuk tumbuh kembangnya.
Jadi kesimpulannya, berdasarkan fitrah nya usia berapa kita sudah bisa mengajarkan anak berpuasa? Baiknya di usia 7 tahun seperti halnya sholat. Di usia menuju 7 tahun itu kita fokus pada mengenalkan, membuat anak kagum, terpesona pada keindahan ramadhan serta rangkaian ibadah di dalamnya Kalaupun sebelum usia 7 tahun misal 6 tahun anak sudah mulai ingin mencoba ya gak apa-apa. Karena datang dari keinginannya send…
Beberapa orang tua keliru. Berfikir lebih cepat anak bisa beribadah itu lebih baik. Berdikir jika agar anak menjadi taat nantinya, dimulai dengan membiasakan. Pernah enggak, melihat atau menemukan anak yang sedang kecilnya begitu rajin sholat, puasa gak pernah bolong, rajin mengaji, kemudian saat mulai besar dan lepas dari pengawasan, ia malah tidak sungkan meninggalkan kewajibannya? Atau mungkin masih rutin ibadah…
Nah, sebagai orang tua mari kita tanyakan lagi pada diri sendiri, kenapa harus terburu-buru ingin anak bisa berpuasa di bulan Ramadhan? Buru-buru ingin anak bisa sholat 5 waktu? Jangan sampai yang seolah niat baik tapi malah mencederai fitrah anak dan bahkan membuat ibadah itu seolah beban bagi anak. Naudzubillah..
Menurut teman-teman, apakah mengajarkan anak berpuasa lebih cepat itu lebih baik?
- Iya55%
- Enggak juga36%
- Bingung9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sheikalova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Menurut teman-teman, apakah mengajarkan anak berpuasa lebih cepat itu lebih baik?
- Iya55%
- Enggak juga36%
- Bingung9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Bunda-bunda mulai mengajarkan anak berpuasa (anak mulai melakukannya) di usia berapa nih?
- 5 tahun56%
- 6 tahun22%
- 7 tahun11%
- Diatas 7 tahun11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2025 to 22 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sheikalova named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sheikalova” (@sheikalova), 1,216 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheikalova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.