【少女坊】总群💋【重要群】💋 pinned a video

Channel
【少女坊】总群💋【重要群】💋
@shaonvfang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,907subscribers
+58 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003528026770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shaonvfang |
| Created | 12 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shaonvfang |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 7,907 | +41 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 7,866 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 7,849 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 80.9%
- avg views ÷ 7,907 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,400
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.891%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 3 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (12 January 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 6,400 |
| Reactions total | 57 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7m 55s
- Average length
- 7m 55s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
57 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 50.9% | |
| 💩 | 26 | 45.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
初发育学生 微微隆起的胸部 萝莉少女 反差母狗朋友妻 完整版所有类型作品点击蓝色字体 👉🏿点击查看 【最新作品】👈🏻👈🏿 原创萝莉少女学生反差母狗朋友妻真实拍摄 【1】每一个男人内心都有一个萝莉梦 私人定制少女自拍自慰 宾馆约学生 网上微信裸聊 朋友女儿 甚至玩弄近亲女孩 【2】永远是别人的老婆好 想睡别人老婆 操朋友的老婆 偷情兄弟的妻子 猥亵女儿 自己的阿姨妈妈 【3】 贤妻良母 教子有方 孝敬父母 夫妻恩爱 自己老婆女人反差 在偷情方面是一个反差跪地上的母狗 【4】带你看下真实定制 真实拍摄 学生 萝莉 少女 朋友妻 兄虎弟老婆 偷情绿帽自己老公老婆 【5】监控下的萝莉女儿 单身妈妈手淫 父母日常做爱 偷情近亲 守着孩子做爱 新上全网最全更新原创ai短剧 最新定制 最新流出作品 https://t.me/yesmmbot
❤29💩26🔥2
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @shaonvfang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,166,394 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【少女坊】总群💋【重要群】💋” (@shaonvfang), 7,907 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaonvfang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.