Channel
@shanshan567
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,720subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002097478999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shanshan567 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shanshan567 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 3,720 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 3,732 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 3,735 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 3,736 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 3,736 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,977 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚫️⚪️ 五子棋挑戰｜第五天 🔥 解不開的局 🔥 哥哥們～第五天挑戰來啦！🧐 今天這一局看似沒有破綻， 但棋盤裡藏著唯一的突破口♟ ⚫️ 黑棋下一步要下在哪裡？ 才能成功完成五子連線？ 🏆 猜中答案的哥哥： 🎁 解鎖專屬小驚喜 📌 活動規則： 1️⃣ 找出最佳落子位置 2️⃣ 留下你的答案 3️⃣ 答對即可獲得獎勵 第五天難度升級🔥 看看哪位哥哥是真正的「棋神」！ ⚫️⚪️ 破解這一局，等你來挑戰！ 😎
啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊
💓【週五試車特選｜菠蘿蜜精選】 💓 今天有幾位超新鮮的妹妹來試車， 喜歡純的、剛下海的哥哥可以把握～ #清純學生妹（18歲） 小可（18） 162／45 還在念書、聲音軟軟的、剛下海沒幾天 目前還是處女，第一次給哥哥 #剛下海小白 小雨（18） 158／46 完全沒經驗、很緊張會害羞 處女、第一次接客 喜歡被溫柔對待、會一直問「這樣可以嗎」 #學生感處女 糖糖（18） 152／42 小小隻、還有點學生味 剛下海、身體還是第一次 #青澀剛下海 小蜜（19） 165／48 大學剛休學、幾乎沒碰過男人 處女、今天第一次試車 會很配合但也很緊張 目前都還有空，想約的直接跟我說喜歡哪一位，我幫你安排。 今天試車有特別優惠，先到先得。 👉官方聯絡方式 LINE：@765cguwg Gleezy：ting TG：@w157
Sticker, posted without a caption
💕 一上班就看到哥哥的訊息了🥹 哥哥今天才剛結束，馬上就在問婷婷今晚還有沒有上班～ 還說想再回約，真的讓我好開心🥰 能讓哥哥想回約，就是對婷婷最大的肯定❤️ 今天也會繼續努力，把每一位哥哥照顧好！
⚫️⚪️ 五子棋挑戰｜Day 4 ⚪️⚫️ 🔥 地獄級挑戰正式開始 🔥 🧠 今天的棋局比昨天更難！ 這一次可不是看到四顆就下了😏 一不小心就會掉進陷阱！ 📢 活動規則 🔸 黑棋先下（⚫️） 🔸 找出唯一能取得優勢的一步！ 🔸 將答案私訊婷婷即可。 🎁 活動獎勵 🏆 猜對唯一正解 💰 立即折抵 NT$1,000 🎉 每人限回答一次。 ⚠️ 提示 ❌ 今天不是堵對手。 ❌ 也不是直接衝五連。 ✅ 真正的高手，會先找到「唯一的致勝點」。 ⚫️ DAY 4｜五子棋高手挑戰 ⚪️ 你有信心一次就答對嗎？ 👀 #五子棋挑戰 #今日得主 #猜對折2000 #8月限定 #婷婷活動 #每天都有新挑戰
讚喔 💓
✨今日推薦｜極品女郎「幕幕」✨ 新竹第一位｜平價高質感女孩登場 平價 不代表品質打折❤️ 她只是希望用更親民的價格 讓更多哥哥能輕鬆認識她 好好放鬆一下 ⭐️ 婷婷私心推薦：直接安排三節 體驗更完整 更盡興！ 名額有限 喜歡這種類型的哥哥可別錯過囉！💕 報班時間：13：30~22：30 有需要的滴滴滴👉🏻婷婷 TG：@w157d #平價 #優質 #服務好 #適合多節 #配合好...... 📍 服務地區：#新竹6k一節 👑豐瑞茶莊← 主頻道（最新消息、活動） 👑豐瑞・私生活← 高級私密分享 👑豐瑞・中都會館← 台中地區妹妹 👑豐瑞・南都會館← 台南 高雄地區妹妹 👑豐瑞・北都會館← 台北 新北 新竹地區妹妹 👑豐瑞・金牌特選← 頂級 / 高質感妹妹專區 👑豐瑞・安心預約處← 預約 咨詢 安排 👑豐瑞・深夜福利社← 極致深夜慰藉 👑每日領快樂← 每日簽到領取優惠 👉官方聯絡方式 LINE：@765cguwg Glee…
⚫️⚪️【五子棋挑戰 Day 3】⚪️⚫️ 🔥 第三天正式升級！ 今天的棋局可沒有前兩天那麼簡單😏 你能在最短時間內找出唯一能獲勝的一步嗎？ 🎯 活動規則 ✅ 仔細觀察棋盤 ✅ 找出黑棋（或白棋）下一步應該落在哪一格 ✅ 將答案私訊婷婷即可 🎁 活動獎勵 🏆 猜對答案 ✨ 直接折抵 NT$1,000 🎉 猜錯也沒關係！ 明天還有新的棋局等你來挑戰～
Sticker, posted without a caption
嘟嘟嘟 週五的預約單 已經開始嚕
QQ 都不給我留後路的嗎 嗚嗚嗚
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @shanshan567. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 19,883 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@shanshan567 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“豐瑞茶莊” (@shanshan567), 3,720 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shanshan567.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.