Channel
@shakyarchived
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001724737683 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shakyarchived |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 December 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shakyarchived |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
16 posts held, back to 31 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
kesayangan ❤️
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
lucuuu @Fovrtwenty @hazelbesar @oxyjer , yang pake babi itu gatau siapa 🥹🥹
Video, posted without a caption
hello, this jedag-jedug nya yaa broo ?!?! special tag : @vParkJiun @sucdc @kidapplaud @jen0opy @izMarkliez @lunjunie @jsphrdx @NotUr_MarkLee @laeheechant @hazelbesar . thank u, yang udah berpartisipasi ikut jj, good luck !
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
@pverjaka @hazelbesar @prhesident @pofnstar
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @shakyarchived. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“archive” (@shakyarchived). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shakyarchived.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.