🏴 فرارسیدن اربعین حسینی بر شیفتگان ثارالله علیهالسلام تسلیت باد. ▪️ @Shahryari_ir
❤13👎1

Channel
@shahryari_ir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,228subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001006556550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shahryari_ir |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shahryari_ir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 2,228 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 2,226 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 2,237 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,242 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,244 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 2,244 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,028 |
| Reactions total | 697 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
697 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 402 | 57.7% | |
| 👎 | 159 | 22.8% | |
| 👍 | 76 | 10.9% | |
| 👏 | 59 | 8.46% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.143% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏴 فرارسیدن اربعین حسینی بر شیفتگان ثارالله علیهالسلام تسلیت باد. ▪️ @Shahryari_ir
❤13👎1
#مناظره #نماینده_مردم @Shahryari_ir
❤25👏3👎2
محمدمهدی شهریاری pinned «تحول در صدا و سیما، گام نخست اتحاد مقدس ✍محمدمهدی شهریاری عضو کمیسیون امنیت ملّی و سیاست خارجی مجلس ▪️رسانه ای که بخش زیادی از مردم را نمی بیند و منتقدان را به رسمیت نمی شناسد، نمی تواند همبستگی، همدلی و وحدت ملّی ایجاد کند. صدا و سیما نمونه عینی چنین رسانه…»
تحول در صدا و سیما، گام نخست اتحاد مقدس ✍محمدمهدی شهریاری عضو کمیسیون امنیت ملّی و سیاست خارجی مجلس ▪️رسانه ای که بخش زیادی از مردم را نمی بیند و منتقدان را به رسمیت نمی شناسد، نمی تواند همبستگی، همدلی و وحدت ملّی ایجاد کند. صدا و سیما نمونه عینی چنین رسانه ای است؛ رسانه ای که با وجود تلاش شبانهروزی هزاران نیرو و تولید محتوی در شبکه های متعدد داخلی و برون مرزی، هر روز با قهر مخاطبان بیشتری روبرو می شود. البته در مج…
👏19❤8👎5👍1
انا لله و انا الیه راجعون ▪️با نهایت تأسف و تألم، درگذشت عالم اندیشمند، حضرت حجتالاسلام والمسلمین حاج شیخ محسن نیازی را محضر خانواده محترم داغدار و خاندان وابسته و عموم مردم شریف شهرستانهای گرمه و جاجرم و بهخصوص شهر ایور تسلیت عرض نموده و از درگاه حضرت احدیت، علو درجات برای آن عزیز سفرکرده و صبر و شکیبایی برای بازماندگان مسئلت مینمایم. روحش شاد و یادش گرامی باد. محمدمهدی شهریاری @Shahryari_ir
❤12
تاکید شهریاری بر تکمیل و بهرهبرداری مجتمع فرهنگی و موزه هنرهای معاصر بجنورد ▪️محمدمهدی شهریاری #نماینده_مردم شش شهرستان خراسان شمالی در مجلس، در دیدار وزیر فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی تکمیل طرح های ناتمام و تقویت منابع و امکانات فرهنگی و هنری در این استان را مورد تاکید و پیگیری قرار داد. ▪️در این دیدار که سهشنبه ششم مرداد در تهران انجام شد، شهریاری خطاب به وزیر فرهنگ مهمترین ظرفیت های فرهنگی و هنری حوزه انتخابیه و انتظ…
👍13❤7👎4👏1
تاکید شهریاری بر تکمیل و بهرهبرداری مجتمع فرهنگی و موزه هنرهای معاصر بجنورد ▪️محمدمهدی شهریاری #نماینده_مردم شش شهرستان خراسان شمالی در مجلس، در دیدار وزیر فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی تکمیل طرح های ناتمام و تقویت منابع و امکانات فرهنگی و هنری در این استان را مورد تاکید و پیگیری قرار داد. ▪️در ادامه بخوانید👇 @Shahryari_ir
👍12❤5👎3
🔰 دیدگاه 💢 بیانیه مجمع ایثارگران خراسان شمالی درحمایت از محمدمهدی شهریاری به نام خدا جناب آقای شهریاری، نماینده ی محترم شهرستان بجنورد، مانه و سملقان و راز و جرگلان،گرمه و جاجرم ▪️پس از گفت و گوی شما با جناب آقای امیر حسین ثابتی نماینده ی معلوم الحال و اقلیّت مردم تهران، دستجاتی که حیات خود را در برپایی جنگ، خون ریزی و ویرانی می بینند، در آتش تفرقه دمیدند و بر طبل جنگ و جدایی، کوفتند. ▪️بر دانایان دیار، روشن است …
❤40👎7👍6👏6
🔰دیدگاه 🔗 تحلیلی از مناظره محمدمهدی شهریاری و ثابتی ✍علی قلی زاده -فعال سیاسی و رسانه ای ▪️چند روز پیش، در جریان مناظره، ثابتی که بهوضوح به دنبال جنگ روانی بود، محمدمهدی شهریاری، نماینده بجنورد را متهم کرد که «میخواهید تنگه هرمز را به دشمن واگذار کنید.» شهریاری که در روزگاری که هنوز خبری از ثابتی نبود، سالها برای دفاع از میهن به جبهه رفته و جانباز شده بود، عصبانی و برافروخته پاسخ داد: «مگر تنگه هرمز مال ننهته…
👏21❤9👎3
🔸 شهریاری: درباره تنگه هرمز واقعیت سخنانم تحریف شد شهریاری با رد روایتهای منتشرشده از اظهاراتش درباره تنگه هرمز گفت هرگز از حقوق ایران بر این آبراه چشمپوشی نکرده و برخی جریانهای سازمانیافته با استفاده از رباتها و شبکههای مجازی، روایت متفاوتی از سخنان او منتشر کردهاند. او همچنین از بررسی طرحهایی در مجلس درباره سازوکارهای جدید مدیریت تنگه هرمز خبر داد. لینک متن کامل در سایت انصاف نیوز: https://ensafnews.com/6…
❤25👎8👍1
🔸 شهریاری: پس از مناظره با موجی از تهدیدها روبهرو شدم نماینده مردم بجنورد گفت پس از مناظره با امیرحسین ثابتی، پیامها و تماسهای تهدیدآمیز متعددی دریافت کرده و این موضوع را بخشی از فعالیت شبکههای سازمانیافته دانست که به گفته او، با انتشار شماره تلفن نمایندگان و هدایت پیامهای توهینآمیز فعالیت میکنند. او از نهادهای امنیتی خواست منشأ و منابع مالی این گروهها را بررسی کنند. لینک متن کامل در سایت انصاف نیوز: http…
❤22👎9
🔹 «هدفم از مناظره، آشکار شدن دیدگاه این جریان بود» محمدمهدی شهریاری گفت با وجود توصیه برخی اطرافیان برای نپذیرفتن مناظره با امیرحسین ثابتی، این دعوت را پذیرفت تا به گفته او، افکار عمومی با رویکردها و شیوه مواجهه این جریان سیاسی آشنا شوند و پیامدهای دیدگاههای تندروانه در ماههای اخیر را بهتر ببینند. لینک متن کامل در سایت انصاف نیوز: https://ensafnews.com/656028/ @ensafnews
❤23👎9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shahryari_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 668,245 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمدمهدی شهریاری” (@shahryari_ir), 2,228 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shahryari_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.