Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ruslan Gafarov

Channel

Ruslan Gafarov

@sfihub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,105subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135982760
TypeChannel
Username@sfihub
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/sfihub

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,0873,1053,0967 August 2026 — 3,092 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,092 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,091 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,090 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,087 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,089 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,091 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,090 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,096 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,092 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,096 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,100 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,099 subscribers25 September 2026 — 3,098 subscribers4 October 2026 — 3,102 subscribers10 October 2026 — 3,105 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 64 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,084–3,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 20:403,105+3
4 Oct 2026, 20:373,102+4
25 Sept 2026, 13:153,098-1
16 Sept 2026, 23:013,099-1
13 Sept 2026, 08:173,100+4
9 Sept 2026, 07:203,096+4
4 Sept 2026, 05:583,092-4
1 Sept 2026, 03:263,096+6
22 Aug 2026, 18:043,090-1
19 Aug 2026, 18:533,091+2
16 Aug 2026, 20:273,089+2
13 Aug 2026, 12:483,087-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:513,090-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:553,091-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:013,092no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:503,092first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6451.2%
🔥2923.2%
👍2520.0%
🕊54.00%
🙏21.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 8 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sfihub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC352 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Часто слышу от предпринимателей примерно один и тот же вопрос: чем отличаются люди, которые строят бизнес на $100 миллионов? Что они делают по-другому? Мне кажется, ответ на этот вопрос сложно найти в книгах или на курсах. Такое мышление часто передается через среду. Когда оказываешься рядом с людьми, которые живут и принимают решения в другом масштабе, начинаешь по-другому смотреть на бизнес и жизнь. Во многом дл…

❤5👍3🔥3🕊1🙏1

14 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC636 views9 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

В мире сейчас много шума. Он связан и с негативными, болезненными событиями, и с быстрым развитием технологий, в том числе AI. Мы пытаемся переварить все, что получаем извне: новости, события, чужие мнения, позитивные и негативные эмоции. Но чем больше становится информации и чем быстрее развиваются технологии, тем важнее, как мне кажется, не потерять связь с реальностью. Часто именно живое взаимодействие с людьми…

🕊4❤3👍1🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC666 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Опубликовали на YouTube первое видео с Silicon Valley Camp 1440, который провели в мае. Это для нас тестовый формат. Видео на английском, но мы добавили русские субтитры. Внутри панельная дискуссия о том, как AI меняет продукты, компании и принятие решений. Одна из мыслей: AI постепенно облегчает доступ к тому, что раньше было доступно только людям с большими командами, капиталом и сильной экспертизой вокруг. Пер…

👍9🔥3

3 Jul 2026, 23:30 UTC684 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Идея комьюнити Silicon Valley Camp 1440 в том, чтобы найти 150 человек, с которыми мы хотим строить отношения в долгую. Мы собираем людей, кому доверяем и с кем хотим выстраивать долгосрочные отношения. Мы сказали об этом на кемпе в мае, и нас поддержали больше половины участников и закоммитились на участие в 2027. Поэтому в этом году мы сразу запланировали активности для комьюнити 1440: онлайн-мастермайнды и офлай…

❤12🔥2👍1

29 Jun 2026, 21:06 UTC611 views18 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Больше всего мы переживали перед программой в мае за то, получится ли при таком количестве участников сохранить ту атмосферу, которая всегда сопровождала нас на буткемпах для 40–50 человек. В этот раз у нас не было эдвайзеров как на буткемпах. В рамках эксперимента мы пригласили лидеров Кремниевой долины, которые на наших буткемпах обычно выступали в роли спикеров, и попросили их помочь нам. Мы назвали эту роль че…

🔥12❤5👍1

23 Jun 2026, 22:34 UTC643 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Одним из первых спикеров на нашей сцене 1440 был Гэри Вайнерчук. Он эксперт в маркетинге и инфлюенсер с аудиторией больше 10 миллионов подписчиков. То, о чем он говорил со сцены, удивило даже меня. Гэри рассказывал о том, насколько сильно в нашей жизни выросло количество онлайн-взаимодействий. И во многом именно через социальные медиа мы сегодня формируем нашу реальность. Я с ним согласен: чем больше AI и социальн…

❤13🔥4👍2

17 Jun 2026, 20:38 UTC771 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда планировали наш ивент 1440, мы четко сформулировали аудиторию, для которой делаем этот продукт. Это люди, которые умеют создавать состояние в $5 млн+. Мы понимали, что у тех, кто сумел заработать такое состояние, скорее всего есть проблема: в их окружении их часто не понимают. Часть людей, с которыми они взаимодействуют с детства, с молодости, возможно, уже не может их понять, потому что они сильно оторвались…

❤9👍6🔥4🙏1

8 Jun 2026, 14:40 UTC592 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда мы начали реализовывать идею Silicon Valley Camp 1440, нам было важно найти тех, кто нас поддержит. Не тогда, когда уже все готово, понятно и красиво упаковано, а в самом начале, когда есть только видение, направление и много неопределенности. Такими людьми для нас стал Founder’s Circle. Поддержка на старте от людей, которые первыми поверили в нашу идею, была незаменима. Именно благодаря этим людям мы понял…

❤17👍2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sfihub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алекс Яновский
@AlexYanovsky · 20,692
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ruslan Gafarov” (@sfihub), 3,105 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sfihub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.