Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 58 days, net +1,170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,730–65,868 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 17:21
65,166
-317
26 Sept 2026, 20:37
65,483
-36
19 Sept 2026, 15:16
65,519
+305
17 Sept 2026, 02:41
65,214
-102
15 Sept 2026, 06:16
65,316
+99
13 Sept 2026, 13:02
65,217
-24
11 Sept 2026, 19:17
65,241
-130
9 Sept 2026, 06:18
65,371
-160
6 Sept 2026, 00:36
65,531
+46
3 Sept 2026, 23:20
65,485
-18
2 Sept 2026, 13:22
65,503
-117
1 Sept 2026, 11:13
65,620
-1
31 Aug 2026, 14:17
65,621
+86
30 Aug 2026, 12:36
65,535
+141
29 Aug 2026, 11:28
65,394
+27
28 Aug 2026, 09:37
65,367
+100
27 Aug 2026, 09:39
65,267
+121
26 Aug 2026, 07:35
65,146
+62
25 Aug 2026, 06:42
65,084
+3
24 Aug 2026, 09:08
65,081
first reading
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.14%
avg views ÷ 65,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 101 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
101 (30 July 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
58,708
Reactions total
3,146
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Oct 2026, 04:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,070
Videos
≈176
Links
≈2,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,847 reactions across 100 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,327
26.3%
👍
2,204
24.9%
🔥
2,203
24.9%
💯
1,689
19.1%
👏
418
4.72%
🍌
3
0.034%
😁
3
0.034%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,847 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Подборка каналов. Как собирать таблицу?
🗣Когда своей базы ещё нет, мы не пытаемся найти один идеальный канал с первой попытки. Для начала требуется собрать максимум предложений, а после переходить к отработке
🔵В TGStat и Telemetr мы ищем по ключевым словам внутри ниши. Каталоги помогают расширить выдачу. Админские чаты дают ещё источники, а размещения конкурентов подсказывают площадки, которые могли не попасть в ос…
Хуявтра. Закупы НИКОГДА не откладывают на другой день
🗣Один из частых косяков новичка: отложить подбор каналов до следующего дня, потому что кажется, что это очень быстро и изи
Почему такой пост: Поставили ученика на новый проект, закупить на 50к руб в тематике новости. По ТЗ закуп нужно начать через 4 дня.
Проходит пятый день, а каналы только начинают собираться. PRESS F закупщику, который въебет сейчас все выход…
Первый день закупщика не должен начинаться с нуля
🗣Когда человек только выходит в закупку, быстро упирается в базу закупов, которой нет. Ну а пока базы нет, каждый проект сначала приходится находить. Потом его нужно проверить и только после этого занести в рабочую таблицу. За один вечер собрать 1000 каналов не получится
У тех, кто после обучения действительно устраивается внаше агентство, все по-другому. Мы бесплат…
Мы устали собирать посты по кускам
🗣Чтобы нормально вести и продвигать один проект, приходится тратить время не только на саму работу. Опубликовал пост — один сервис, дошёл до закупов — другой, понадобился розыгрыш — уже третий. А дальше к этому начинают пристраиваться нейросеть, обратная связь, магазины, автоворонки и партнёрки.
В какой-то момент сам проект начинает жить между кучей разных инструментов. Поэтому на…
Теперь официально: SETKATEAM × Admaker&Relux
🗣Ловите классную новость: мы стали амбассадорами экосистемы Admaker&Relux. Кроме того, что мы являемся лицом проекта, предлагаем познакомиться с функционалом, который мы помогли разработать специально для владельцев проектов.
PS: функционал в закрепе канала
А вечером выложим, почему мы вообще в это вписались. Если новость нравится — кидайте 🔥
Еще одна конченная тематика — игры.
🗣Продолжаем разбор тематик, где сидят ебнутые админы. На этот раз, к нам на продвижение пришел сервис по интернету без ограничений. И так как у них есть игровые сервисы, решили закупать по этому УТП.
Админы здесь пошли дальше, и после оплаты сразу уходят в игнор. Не скидывают отлоги, хотя ты из просишь.
И самое главное — они забывают выложить посты на несколько дней.
Один из …
🗣В вакансиях обычно всё красиво: анализировать площадки, закупать рекламу, работать с бюджетом.
Мы перевели это с HR-ского на человеческий и собрали неофициальную должностную инструкцию закупщика.
Ставьте реакцию, если узнали рабочий день.
Контент бесит, а реклама нравится?
🗣Если вам интереснее искать каналы, тестировать размещения, разбирать трафик и решать, куда отправить бюджет, то возможно, вам ближе не SMM, а закупка рекламы.
🔘Если за последнюю неделю вы читали наши разборы и ловили себя на мысли «блять, вот это мне интересно» — посмотрите направление Закупщик рекламы.
Пройди тест: https://t.me/setkateambot?start=zakupshik
Распределять рекламный бюджет поровну — тупая идея
🗣Перед тем как нормально заливать бюджет в рекламу, мы сначала тестируем разные источники и смотрим, что они вообще нам дают.
Потому что заранее решить, что половина денег пойдёт в таргет, а половина в посевы, просто потому что так красиво делится бюджет, это пальцем в небо.
🔘 Допустим, таргет после теста привёл подписчика в два раза дешевле или дал в два раза луч…
🗣Что в голосовом? — текстом для тех, кому лень слушать голосовые
🔘Как понять, что рекламный креатив говно
💬 Наш Max: https://max.ru/setkateamobuchenie
🌐 Наш сайт: setkateam.pro
SETKATEAM | Маркетинг в телеграм
Опять накосячил по заказу? Скидывай клиенту это видео
Тебя простят сразу
👍21❤17🔥17💯12👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @setkateamobuchenie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@setkateamobuchenie edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
16 September 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Представь: тебе выдели 1млн рекламного бюджета, что ты сделаешь?
Сворую половину (осуждаем)45%
Начну подбирать каналы под закуп45%
Разработка рекламную стратегию36%
Обрадуюсь и сразу куплю рекламу18%
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вам нужно закупить рекламу. Вы написали админу, и он скинул вам прайс. Что дальше?
Согласовать рекламный креатив и дату входа поста27%
Забронировать место и оплатить7%
Попытаться скинуть в цене и забронировать27%
Послать его на ***, ибо очень дорого53%
Внести в таблицу закупов и согласовать размещение13%
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие задачи можно отдать ИИ, если вы закупщик рекламы?
Хз, все делаю руками42%
Заполнение таблицы47%
Подбор каналов28%
Переписку с клиентами22%
Всю работу ИИ28%
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
У нас скопилась целая база на 500+ мошенников, вам надо?
Да, кину всех в чс55%
Хочу, чтобы меня обманывали23%
Я мошенник32%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если бы ты был контенщиком этого проекта. То что бы ты изменил?
Больше видео-уроков18%
Добавил бы лайф формат29%
Меньше ИИ. Больше человечности41%
Ничего не менял бы0%
Розыгрыши и интерактивы35%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SETKATEAM | Маркетинг в Телеграм” (@setkateamobuchenie), 65,166 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/setkateamobuchenie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.