Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
46 measurements spanning 78 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,416–11,180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 04:45
11,063
-3
23 Oct 2026, 02:40
11,066
+6
22 Oct 2026, 02:06
11,060
-3
20 Oct 2026, 21:36
11,063
+68
19 Oct 2026, 19:46
10,995
+491
18 Oct 2026, 17:08
10,504
-26
17 Oct 2026, 18:28
10,530
-4
16 Oct 2026, 21:35
10,534
-4
16 Oct 2026, 00:20
10,538
-5
14 Oct 2026, 20:56
10,543
-2
13 Oct 2026, 11:39
10,545
-23
9 Oct 2026, 09:21
10,568
-62
4 Oct 2026, 19:56
10,630
-34
27 Sept 2026, 05:15
10,664
-62
17 Sept 2026, 11:38
10,726
-17
15 Sept 2026, 08:18
10,743
-9
13 Sept 2026, 17:19
10,752
-18
11 Sept 2026, 20:41
10,770
-15
9 Sept 2026, 06:41
10,785
-37
6 Sept 2026, 01:37
10,822
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 25 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3,038 reactions across 32 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,105
36.4%
❤
982
32.3%
👎
258
8.49%
😁
179
5.89%
🤣
161
5.30%
🍌
111
3.65%
💩
36
1.18%
🔥
28
0.922%
👏
27
0.889%
🤡
27
0.889%
👌
20
0.658%
🖕
12
0.395%
🙏
11
0.362%
🌭
10
0.329%
🥱
10
0.329%
💔
9
0.296%
😐
9
0.296%
😍
8
0.263%
💯
7
0.23%
🤝
5
0.165%
10 further kinds
23
0.757%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,038 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2025 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: خلافت
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Caliphate (Kalifat)
این جمله از کتاب "ابتذال شر" رو شنیدید که میگه "شر هیچوقت عمیق نیست؛ فقط از ناتوانی در اندیشیدن سرچشمه میگیره."
حالا تو این سریال ببینیدش.
داستان سرنوشت چند زن جوونه که گرفتار افراطگرایی مذهبی میشن؛ پروین که همراه شوهر داعشیش به رقه رفته، فاطیما که بهعنوان مامور امنیتی میخواد جلوی یه حملهی تروریستی رو بگیره، و سولی، دختر نوجوونی تو استکهلم که…
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: حقهها
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Hacks
داستان از این قراره که عشق من دبورا😍🍒، یه کمدین افسانهای لاسوگاسی که کارش داره از رونق میفته، مجبور میشه با آوا، یه چسونه دهه هشتادی کار کنه😄؛ ترکیبی که از اولش معلومه قراره یا همدیگه رو بگان یا همدیگه رو بگان.😎
از اون سریالایی که ظاهرش کمدیه ولی زیرش پره از حرفای جدی دربارهی پیری، جاهطلبی، و اینکه چطور دو نسل کاملا متفاوت میتونن (بهزور) کنار هم یاد بگیرن.…
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: داستان عشق: جان اف کندی جونیور و کارولین بسِت
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. & Carolyn Bessette
و از هر چه بگذریم سخن عشق خوش تر است🥹💌
این مینیسریال داستان واقعی عاشقانهی جان اف کندی جونیور، پسر رئیسجمهور فقید آمریکا، و همسرش کارولین بسِت رو روایت میکنه؛ از آشناییشون تا ازدواج پرسروصدا و زندگی زیر ذرهبین رسانهها.
ببینید و بیاموزید و دیگه ناشکری نکنید که مثل من و جان جو…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: دکالوگ
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Dekalog
اگر دنبال کصشر دیدن هستی این سریال به درد تو نمیخوره.😃اما اگر دنبال عمق و فلسفه هستی جای درستی اومدی😎
دکالوگ اثر کریشتف کیشلوفسکی، کارگردان بزرگ لهستانی؛ ده تا فیلم کوتاه یکساعته که هرکدوم الهامگرفته از یکی از ده فرمان (احکام دهگانهی تورات/انجیل) هستن. داستان همهشون تو یه مجتمع آپارتمانی معمولی تو ورشو میگذره و آدمای معمولی رو نشون میده که با معضلات اخلاق…
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: تد لاسو
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Ted Lasso
یه مربی فوتبال آمریکایی که تا حالا حتی یه بار هم فوتبال بازی نکرده، میره انگلیس تا یه تیم رو مربیگری کنه؛ دقیقا مثل اینکه یه نفرو بذارن خلبان هواپیما چون قبلا راننده اسنپ بوده😂
و اون کسی نیست جز یکی از عساتید عنگیزشی😂
اگه یه روز بد داشتی و دلت گرمی میخواد، همینو بذار پلی که یه دختر خوشگل هم توش بازی میکنه🍒🥹
🎭 کمدی/درام ورزشی
⭐️ IMDb: 8.8/10
📺 ۳ فصل، ۳۴ قس…
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: مدیر شب
🎬 نام انگلیسی: The Night Manager
یه سریال جاسوسی پر از سکانسای لاگژری😄
یه مدیر هتل که یهو با MI6 قاطی میشه تا یه تاجر اسلحهی کثیف رو لو بده.
با حضور خوش تیپ خوش تیپا تام هیدلستون.
⭐️ IMDb: 8.0
📺 فصل اول ۶ قسمته (۲۰۱۶)، فصل جدیدشم امسال اومده
@seriespiknikal
👍33❤10👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @seriespiknikal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2025 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سریالهای پیکنیکی” (@seriespiknikal), 11,063 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seriespiknikal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
