Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
11,700 average views per post against 11,005 subscribers — an engagement rate of 106.7%. Across the 7,882 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.75% and 17.3%, with a median of 8.76%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (17 July 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Posts measured
14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
164,320
Mature posts only
106.7% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,992–11,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:04
11,005
-17
14 Aug 2026, 05:18
11,022
-7
12 Aug 2026, 23:16
11,029
-21
11 Aug 2026, 19:52
11,050
-5
10 Aug 2026, 17:48
11,055
-8
9 Aug 2026, 18:12
11,063
-15
8 Aug 2026, 18:28
11,078
-14
7 Aug 2026, 14:45
11,092
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:34
11,092
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 25 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
106.7%
avg views ÷ 11,005 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,700
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.626%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
24 (25 January 2025 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
164,320
Reactions total
1,028
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,633 reactions across 24 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,059
40.2%
❤
808
30.7%
👎
232
8.81%
😁
162
6.15%
🤣
98
3.72%
🍌
73
2.77%
💩
34
1.29%
🔥
28
1.06%
🤡
27
1.03%
👌
20
0.76%
👏
20
0.76%
🖕
12
0.456%
🥱
10
0.38%
🙏
9
0.342%
😍
8
0.304%
💯
7
0.266%
🤝
5
0.19%
🕊
4
0.152%
💅
3
0.114%
😈
3
0.114%
7 further kinds
11
0.418%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,633reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: تد لاسو
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Ted Lasso
یه مربی فوتبال آمریکایی که تا حالا حتی یه بار هم فوتبال بازی نکرده، میره انگلیس تا یه تیم رو مربیگری کنه؛ دقیقا مثل اینکه یه نفرو بذارن خلبان هواپیما چون قبلا راننده اسنپ بوده😂
و اون کسی نیست جز یکی از عساتید عنگیزشی😂
اگه یه روز بد داشتی و دلت گرمی میخواد، همینو بذار پلی که یه دختر خوشگل هم توش بازی میکنه🍒🥹
🎭 کمدی/درام ورزشی
⭐️ IMDb: 8.8/10
📺 ۳ فصل، ۳۴ قس…
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: مدیر شب
🎬 نام انگلیسی: The Night Manager
یه سریال جاسوسی پر از سکانسای لاگژری😄
یه مدیر هتل که یهو با MI6 قاطی میشه تا یه تاجر اسلحهی کثیف رو لو بده.
با حضور خوش تیپ خوش تیپا تام هیدلستون.
⭐️ IMDb: 8.0
📺 فصل اول ۶ قسمته (۲۰۱۶)، فصل جدیدشم امسال اومده
@seriespiknikal
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: میهن (۲۰۲۰)
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Patria
این سریال داستان دو خانوادهی همسایه تو منطقهی باسک اسپانیاست که سالها دوست بودن، تا اینکه یکی از پسرای یه خانواده عضو گروه تروریستی میشه و پدر خانوادهی دیگه رو ترور میکنه.
سریال با روایتی دوزمانه بین گذشته و حال، عمق فاجعهای رو نشون میده که تروریسم روی روابط انسانی، خانواده و دوستی میذاره.
سریال درامه و به حال و هوای این روزامون خیلی نزدیکه.🙁
⭐️ …
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#معرفی_سریال
🎬 نام فارسی: دکستر: رستاخیز (۲۰۲۵)
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Dexter: Resurrection
ماجرا از این قراره که دکستر از کما بیدار میشه و میفهمه پسرش هریسون تو نیویورک درگیر یه قتل شده، پس راهی نیویورک میشه تا پیداش کنه. اونجا با یهسری قاتل سریالی دیگه هم آشنا میشه که یه میلیاردر مرموز برنامه کنشونه😬 و اون کسی نیست به جز شیطونک هالیوود پیتر دینکلیج.
اگه فن نسخه اصلی بودی و از پایان نسخهی قبلی (New Blood) ناامید شدی، …
خب، کامنتها را هم باز کردیم. لطفاً اگر حوصلهتون میشه، سریالهای خوبی که دیدید رو با ذکر دلیل که چرا خوب بودند، معرفی کنید. همچنین اگر پیشنهادی در مورد کانال دارید، همین زیر 👇 با ما به اشتراک بگذارید.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎬 نام فارسی: جداسازی (۲۰۲۲ تا کنون)
🎬 نام انگلیسی: Severance
ماجرا از این قراره که شرط استخدام تو یه شرکتی، انجام یه عمل جراحیه؛ اونم نه لیپوساکشن و لیفت و از این جور خوشگلبازیا، بلکه یه تراشه که تو مغز کارمندا کار میذارن، طوری که وقتی سرکارن چیزی از زمانی که سرکار نیستن یادشون نمیاد، و وقتی تو خونهان راجعبه کارشون تو شرکت چیزی یادشون نیست.
دقیقا همون چیزی که تو دنبالشی هموطن😄
پس این سریالو حتما ببین.
⭐️ IMDb:…
🎬 نام فارسی: عشق بیرحمانه (۲۰۲۵)
🎬 نام انگلیسی: A Cruel Love
این سریال داستان زندگی روث الیس، آخرین زنیه که تو بریتانیا اعدام شد.
روث سالها بهعنوان هوستس و بعدا مدیر کلوپهای شبانه لندن کار میکرد و تو دورهای هم به روسپیگری روی آورد، بعد بهخاطر قتل معشوقش به اعدام محکوم میشه.
اعدام این زن موجی از خشم رو تو بریتانیا به پا میکنه و باعث میشه اون آخرین زنی باشه که تو این کشور اعدام شده.
به امید روزی که تو کشور …
❤122👎44🕊4🍌2💔2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @seriespiknikal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2025 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سریالهای پیکنیکی” (@seriespiknikal), 11,005 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seriespiknikal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.