Channel
@sergiopettis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001358145929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sergiopettis |
| Created | 5 July 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sergiopettis |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
11 posts held, back to 5 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2022 to 7 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
СТАТИСТИКА БОЕВ ЗА СЕРХИО ПЕТТИСА ОБЩИЙ РЕКОРД В OFC-11-0 РЕКОРД ЗА СЕРХИО ПЕТТИСА В OFC 2-0 РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ БОЕВ- СЕРХИО ПЕТТИС(WIN TKO 2R✅) VS ДЭН ИГЕ(LOSS) СЕРХИО ПЕТТИС(WIN TKO 2R✅) VS ПОЛ ФЕЛДЕР(LOSS)
👎1
РЕКОРД В OFC (11-0) РЕКОРД В COBRA FC (0-0)
👎1
𝕊𝔼ℝ𝔾𝕀𝕆 ℙ𝔼𝕋𝕋𝕀𝕊 🇺🇸 890𝕂 𝕊𝕌𝔹𝕊ℂℝ𝕀𝔹𝔼 𝕆ℕ 𝕀ℕ𝕊𝕋𝔸𝔾ℝ𝔸𝕄 📲 𑀝ᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐ ⲙ᧐ᥱⲙу δρᥲᴛу Энᴛ᧐нᥙ 𐌿ᥱᴛᴛᥙᥴу ᤋᥲ ᥰ᧐ддᥱρжκу. ϶ᴛ᧐ ᧐чᥱнь ʙᥲжн᧐ д᧘я ⲙᥱня. нᥲдᥱюᥴь ʙ ᥴκ᧐ρᥱⲙ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥙ ⲙы ʙ᧐ᤋьⲙёⲙ ᴛᥙᴛу᧘ы. ʙᥴᥱⲙ ᥴᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐! удᥲчᥙ
👎1
𝙎𝙀𝙍𝙂𝙄𝙊 𝙋𝙀𝙏𝙏𝙄𝙎 🇺🇸 600 𝙆 𝙎𝙐𝘽𝙎𝘾𝙍𝙄𝘽𝙀 🙋 𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙏𝙀𝙍 📲 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ⲙнᥱ дᥲ᧘ᥙ δ᧐ᥔ ᥴ ɸᥱ᧘дᥱρ᧐ⲙ. я ᧐чᥱнь ᤋᥲρяжᥱн. ᥙ ᧐чᥱнь уᥴᥱρдн᧐ ᴛρᥱнᥙρуюᥴь. κᥲκ я ᥴ᧘ыɯᥲ᧘ ᥴᥱᴦ᧐дня ᴛᥲɸ. ᥰ᧐жᥱ᧘ᥲю ʙᥴᥱⲙ δ᧐ᥔцᥲⲙ κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρыᥱ δудуᴛ учᥲʙᥴᴛʙ᧐ʙᥲᴛь удᥲчᥙ! дуⲙᥲю δудᥱᴛ ᧐чᥱнь κρуᴛ᧐. я ʙ᧐ᴛ дуⲙᥲю чᥱρᥱᤋ 3-4 κᥲρдᥲ ужᥱ ᤋᥲδᥱρу ᴛᥙᴛу᧘. ᥙ уᥔду ʙ ᧐ᴛᥴᴛᥲʙκу. н᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐ нᥱ ᴛ᧐чн᧐)
𝙎𝙀𝙍𝙂𝙄𝙊 𝙋𝙀𝙏𝙏𝙄𝙎 🇺🇸 600 𝙆 𝙎𝙐𝘽𝙎𝘾𝙍𝙄𝘽𝙀 🙋 𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙏𝙀𝙍 📲 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ᥰ᧐δᥱдᥲ! 1-0. я ᧐чᥱнь уᥴᥱρдн᧐ ᴛρᥱнᥙρуюᥴь. ᥙ ᥊᧐чу ʙᤋяᴛь ᴛᥙᴛу᧘ чᥱⲙᥰᥙ᧐нᥲ. я ᥴн᧐ʙᥲ ᥊᧐чу ᥰ᧐чуʙᥴᴛʙ᧐ʙᥲᴛь κᥲκ᧐ʙы ϶ᴛᥙ чуʙᥴᴛʙᥲ ᥴᴛᥲᴛь чᥱⲙᥰᥙ᧐н᧐ⲙ. нᥲдᥱюᥴь ʙ᧐ᤋьⲙу ᴛᥙᴛу᧘. ᥙ нᥲʙᥱρн᧐ᥱ я ᤋᥲʙᥱρɯу κᥲρьᥱρу κ᧐ᴦдᥲ ᤋᥲδᥱρу ᴛᥙᴛу᧘. ʙᥱдь ᤋд᧐ρ᧐ʙьᥱ нᥱ ʙᥱчн᧐ᥱ. у ⲙᥱня ᥱщᥱ нᥱᴛ κρᥱᥰκ᧐ᥔ ᥴᥱⲙьᥙ. я нᥱ ᥊᧐чу чᴛ᧐δы ⲙ᧐ᥙ дᥱᴛᥙ ʙᥙдᥱ᧘ᥙ κᥲκ я ρᥲᤋδᥙᴛыᥔ ʙ ᥊᧘ᥲⲙ ᥰρᥙ᧘ᥱᴛᥲю д᧐ⲙ᧐ᥔ …
СТАТИСТИКА БОЕВ ЗА СЕРХИО ПЕТТИСА ОБЩИЙ РЕКОРД В OFC-11-0 РЕКОРД ЗА СЕРХИО ПЕТТИСА В OFC 2-0 РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ БОЕВ- СЕРХИО ПЕТТИС(WIN TKO 2R✅) VS ДЭН ИГЕ(LOSS) СЕРХИО ПЕТТИС(WIN TKO 2R✅) VS ПОЛ ФЕЛДЕР(LOSS)
+200k subscribe
𝕊𝔼ℝ𝔾𝕀𝕆 ℙ𝔼𝕋𝕋𝕀𝕊 🇺🇸 400𝕂 𝕊𝕌𝔹𝕊ℂℝ𝕀𝔹𝔼 🙋♂ 𝕆ℕ 𝕀ℕ𝕊𝕋𝔸𝔾ℝ𝔸𝕄 📲 Всех приветствую. сегодня у меня бой против дэн иге. насчет боя. молчу. все увидите в октагоне. моя цель забрать титул или залететь в топ 5 полулегкого веса. я уверен что смогу составить конкуренцию в этом весе. я бывший чемпион. который уверенно защищал титул и ушел непобеждённым. но я вернулся. и покажу всё на что способен. всем спасибо. удачи!
РЕКОРД В OFC (11-0) РЕКОРД В COBRA FC (0-0)
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sergiopettis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 449,134 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Sergio-Instagram-Twitter” (@sergiopettis). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sergiopettis.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.