Channel
@serenity_arts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,089subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002557330393 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @serenity_arts |
| Description | ₊‧꒰ ВП 500+ (писать в соо канала) ₊‧꒰ Прайс лист/коммишки — @serenity_artscomms ₊‧꒰ бот для связи: @serenityartsBOT Также вы можете написать в сообщения канала!! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/serenity_arts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:22 | 1,089 | no change |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 1,089 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (23 October 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 13,186 |
| Reactions total | 1,283 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,283 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5312396867479304437 | 293 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5366418759969942637 | 271 | 21.1% | |
| 🦄 | 244 | 19.0% | |
| 👻 | 207 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5366426022759642633 | 156 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5323761024527002425 | 112 | 8.73% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,283 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ураа я накопила артов для этого видео😀 Какой ты арт по месяцу рождения >> https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSphC84YR/ (Мне просто нужно было проявить актив в тт чтобы про мое существование не забыли)
👻37custom 536641875996994263714🦄8custom 53123968674793044372custom 53237610245270024251
Пр всякие долги рисую🧸 #moeartstyle #serenity_arts #арт #с_нуля
custom 531239686747930443771custom 532376102452700242527custom 536641875996994263723custom 53664260227596426338👻3🦄3
. 𖠇𒈞\————-—————-/𒈞𖠇 𓂃ෆ˚ᴛʀᴀᴅᴇ ᴡɪᴛʜ sᴇʀᴇɴɪᴛʏ
custom 536642602275964263342🦄23custom 536641875996994263718custom 53237610245270024255👻3custom 53123968674793044372
🐱Пр моя часть трейда итд с @glirme #moeartstyle #serenity_arts #арт #с_нуля
custom 531239686747930443763custom 536641875996994263730🦄20custom 53664260227596426338👻3custom 53237610245270024253
Пасибо за подарочки кстати!!🥰 Особенно за зомби медведя я очень хотела штобы мне его подарили🥺🥺❤️
🦄44👻15custom 536642602275964263313
Posted without readable text
🦄60custom 531239686747930443726custom 536641875996994263718custom 53664260227596426337custom 53237610245270024253
Позже отпишу всем в лс!! Спасибо за участие!! На следующий хеллоуин будут еще более интересные ивенты или другие интерактивы Очень люблю этот праздник ребят😊
custom 531239686747930443715custom 53664260227596426336🦄4
🎀ИТОГИ ИВЕНТА CANDY HUNT🎀💀 🎀 1 место: @Ekaternburg (4🍭) 🎀2 место: @s1oikrinso (3🍭) 🎀3 место: @TsukinoMiyuki (2🍭) 🧙♀️🎀РЕЙТИНГ🎀🎀 @Tsykaca — 1 @s1oikrinso — 3 (1 голос) @vbntyv — 3 @Ekaternburg — 4 @Marycar3y — 1 @Kirasneshka — 1 @miomizoZZZ — 1 @Keidosha — 1 @P1X3L_PR1NC355 — 1 @qeuew — 1 @inixssw — 1 @smiletime_top — 1 @deadinsiide — 1 @fisttashko — 1 @sleepleash — 1 @reniasano — 1 @Felesityorg — 1 @kibzzZZ0 — 1 …
custom 532376102452700242513🦄3custom 53123968674793044373👻1
Лан я пошутиля я что то рисую но тока на этапе лайна😊 Так что вот спойлеры😴 #moeartstyle #serenity_arts #арт #с_нуля
custom 536642602275964263342custom 531239686747930443713👻8custom 53664187599699426374custom 53237610245270024253🦄1
🎀3️⃣1️⃣ОКТЯБРЯ🕷🥹 Ночь 31 октября самая жуткая ночь в году. Сегодня будут подведены итоги хеллоуинского ивента😺 Арта нет но вы держитесь. Зато вот я в шляпе🤩
custom 536641875996994263776custom 536642602275964263329👻22custom 53123968674793044375custom 53237610245270024252🦄1
Posted without readable text
🦄10👻3custom 53664187599699426373
Лотерея!!! Итоги уже через 2 часа🥺
custom 532376102452700242523👻4custom 53664187599699426374
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @serenity_arts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#* Seren1ty Arts✞🍭🪽” (@serenity_arts), 1,089 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serenity_arts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.