6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,023–2,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 12:46
2,047
+7
14 Aug 2026, 13:57
2,040
+14
10 Aug 2026, 20:58
2,026
-7
7 Aug 2026, 15:15
2,033
+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:01
2,032
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:30
2,032
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
110.3%
avg views ÷ 2,047 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
16 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
29,364
Reactions total
483
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 07s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
588 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
230
39.1%
😢
222
37.8%
🔥
42
7.14%
🐳
41
6.97%
👍
19
3.23%
😁
14
2.38%
🕊
10
1.70%
⚡
6
1.02%
☃
2
0.34%
👎
2
0.34%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 588reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 16 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @serbian_nature. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Человек из Карабурмы: он начал с кормушки для птиц, а в итоге создал зеленый оазис
Синиша Петрович озеленил белградский микрорайон, в котором живет. Все началось с кормушки для птиц, а полтора года спустя рядом со зданием появился зеленый оазис с фонтаном, скворечниками, цветами и деревьями.
Это был пустырь. Моя жена хотела, чтобы я сделал кормушку для птиц. Затем я начал таскать камни и строить. Соседи спрашивали,…
Видео: косуля принимает морские ванны
В жару тяжело и людям, и животным. В Хорватии, на острове Крк, заметили косулю, которая зашла в море и немного поплавала, не смущаясь присутствием рядом туристов.
🔎 Европейская косуля (лат. Capreólus capreólus) — в сербском языке «срна»
🌿 Узнайте больше о балканской природе!
Видео: змея повисла над рулем автомобиля
Представьте: возвращаетесь вы к своему автомобилю, а там…
Сцена снята в Сьенице — городе в Златиборском округе, в районе Пештерского плато.
Это горная часть Сербии со специфическим климатом, скалистыми участками, пастбищами и водоемами. Встречи со змеями редкостью тут не являются.
Змея отчаянно пыталась освободиться. Как она там застряла, неизвестно. Также не сообщается, ч…
Прокуратура займется родителями, чьи дети мучили лошадь
В середине июля белградец А.М. заметил в районе Вишничка-Баня (Белград, Палилула) двоих несовершеннолетних, которые били деревянной палкой запряженную в повозку лошадь и заставляли ее идти в гору. Он снял видеодоказательство.
Высшая прокуратура Белграда направила в Первую основную прокуратуру отчет полицейского отделения вместе с собранными материалами.
В вед…
Редчайший карликовый сверчок замечен в Хорватии
В национальном парке Крка биологи заметили редкого карликового сверчка (лат. Stenonemobius gracilis). Вид был впервые зарегистрирован в стране в 2021 году на мысе Каменяк в Истрии. Теперь это — всего второй подтвержденный случай его обнаружения в Хорватии, и первый — на территории Далмации.
Как и в 2021 году, ученым удалось обнаружить лишь одну особь. Насекомое привле…
Видео: медведь подкрадывается к человеку
Медведи — столь многочисленные обитатели нашего региона, что постоянно становятся героями новостей. На этот раз видео из Румынии показывает, как вышедший из леса молодой медведь подходит сзади к человеку, говорящему на трассе по телефону.
Выглядит так, будто «говорящий» не замечает движения позади и попыток понюхать или облизать его. Это не так: вероятнее всего, он оценил ди…
Женщину госпитализировали после укуса паука черная вдова
Случай произошел недавно в Северной Македонии, но этот вид пауков встречается и в Сербии. Кому плюс один страх?
Черная вдова укусила 61-летнюю женщину во время работы в поле. Женщина почувствовала сильную боль в руке и спине, головокружение и судороги по всему телу, после чего ее в экстренном порядке доставили в отделение неотложной помощи города Велес.
Паука…
Видео: медвежонок купается в ведре
И снова о медведях — теперь о соседских. Вероятно, самое милое видео, которое вы увидите за сегодня.
Медвежонок из лесов Горского Котара (Хорватия) наткнулся на ведро, полное воды, которое егеря оставляют в лесу, чтобы помочь диким животным справиться с высокими температурами. Сначала он утолил жажду, а затем забрался в ведро, наслаждаясь холодной ванной.
🌿 Узнайте больше о балка…
Пчелиные ульи выброшены на помойку
Возмутительную сцену сняли в белградском районе Борча: несколько пчелиных ульев, рамки с сотами, кто-то просто выставил к мусорным контейнерам.
🌿 Узнайте больше о природе Сербии!
Встреча с медведем на Таре: видео
Любители прогулок на природе едва не столкнулись с медведем «лицом к лицу». В какой-то момент медведь остановился, поднял голову, увидел людей, развернулся и убежал.
Это — распространенный вариант развития событий: медведи не охотятся на людей. Но они могут быть агрессивны, если они больны, защищают медвежат, или же какое-то действие человека встревожит их.
При встрече с любым мед…
Знакомьтесь: самый юный обитатель белградского зоопарка
В Белградском зоопарке этим летом появился новый обитатель — детеныш пингвина Гумбольдта, который в настоящее время является самым молодым животным в Саду Доброй Надежды.
У маленького пингвина до сих пор нет имени: для определения его пола ожидается анализ ДНК. Пока что он не расстается со своей грумершей Альмой, которая заботится о нем каждый день.
🔎 Пингвин…
🐝 Массовая гибель пчел под Нишем
На ферме Ненада Милутиновича под Нишем за короткое время погибло более 30 пчелиных семей — это сотни тысяч пчел.
Причина массовой гибели пока официально не установлена, однако специалисты Ветеринарного института Ниша подозревают острое отравление химикатами.
Версия об опасном инфекционном заболевании не подтверждается. Провести токсикологическую экспертизу институты пока не могут: …
😢61
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @serbian_nature. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 52,797 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎋 Природа Сербии” (@serbian_nature), 2,047 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serbian_nature.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.