Photo, posted without a caption
custom 5352732717832243248200custom 537530262494382587562

Channel
@seqquoia33
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
2,246subscribers
+124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003473156194 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seqquoia33 |
| Created | 24 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seqquoia33 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:34 | 2,246 | +9 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 14:02 | 2,237 | +17 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 2,220 | +11 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 2,209 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 2,208 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 2,204 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 2,207 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:08 | 2,214 | +17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 2,197 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 2,189 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 2,182 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 2,174 | +15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 2,159 | +15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 2,144 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 2,139 | +14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 2,125 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 2,122 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 2,122 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
736 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352732717832243248 | 518 | 70.4% | |
| custom 5375302624943825875 | 218 | 29.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 736 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seqquoia33. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 5352732717832243248200custom 537530262494382587562
Video, posted without a caption
custom 537530262494382587565custom 535273271783224324826
Никогда в своей жизни нахуй я не постила НИКАКИЕ ФОТКИ ЗА ЗВЕЗДЫ, потому что я считаю это полным кринжом и фулл хуетой)) ну кому впадлу можете прост видос чекнуть, который я дропала в тикток еще весной)
custom 535273271783224324866custom 537530262494382587525
Чел или телка, я в душе не ебу, кто этим занимается, делал не только тоже самое, что и остальные владельцы фейковых каналов, он/она пошел куда дальше. Фотки за звезды, общение от моего имени, скам челов на бабки, ведение не только фейкового телеграм канала, но и тиктока, инстаграмма: Это просто пиздец, че сказать)). Человек появляется во всех коментах под видосами с отметкой simenkko, общается там с челами от моего …
custom 535273271783224324860custom 537530262494382587524
Апогея этого пиздеца - тгк, созданный наглухо ебнутым человеком
custom 535273271783224324852custom 537530262494382587519
После удаления моего единственного тгк мной же по личным причинам, я создала новый, и люди, у которых явно проблемы с головой,решили, что это ебанутый шанс нажиться и залутать звезды = в последствии ахуенные 200 рублей 😂✌🏻 Ими были созданы новые каналы: Наверное,не стоит объяснять, что мне нет резона якобы делать еще 100 каналов на 40 подписчиков и выкладывать туда ебучие фотки на звезды? Также как и в самый первый…
custom 535273271783224324848custom 537530262494382587515
Так как чел или телка перешел/шла уже все границы дозволенного, выкатываю такой пост Еще позапрошлым летом, когда я только начинала вести тикток аккаунт (речь идет про тот, в котором сейчас 40+к, и к нему у меня больше нет доступа) мной был заведен также телеграм канал (один единственный), куда постила только свои фотки. Через некоторое время подписчики начали кидать мне какой-то другой канал, ЯКОБЫ МОЙ, куда просто…
custom 535273271783224324866custom 53753026249438258758
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @seqquoia33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“simenkko” (@seqquoia33), 2,246 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seqquoia33.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.