6 measurements spanning 11 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,285–1,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 23:22
1,286
-3
15 Aug 2026, 02:37
1,289
-2
11 Aug 2026, 09:15
1,291
-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:16
1,293
+2
7 Aug 2026, 08:32
1,291
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:18
1,291
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 1,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
292
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
17 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
4,968
Reactions total
290
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
290 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
162
55.9%
🔥
82
28.3%
🤣
13
4.48%
😁
12
4.14%
🎉
8
2.76%
👍
7
2.41%
🤯
4
1.38%
👀
2
0.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Доброе размеренное♥️
Последние недели у меня славно складывается с режимом сна. Легко ложусь в одно и то же время – до 1:00.
Ключевое слово – легко.
Это просто чудо какое-то. Годами задача «вовремя лечь спать» воспринималась как целый квест.
А сейчас без проблем и залипаний в рилс вечером иду в душ, спокойно переделав все дела уже днём.
Переделать дела вовремя очень помогает магнитная меловая доска на холодильник…
Друзья, мне сегодня исполняется 34 года🎁
И лучшим подарком будет ваша поддержка моего возвращения на ютуб!
Смотрите ролик «Зачем разбирать детство с психологом?» ставьте лайки и пишите комментарии♥️
Если кто-то из вас когда-нибудь создавал контент, то вы знаете насколько воодушевляет отклик аудитории.
Моя задача на сегодня – продолжать дисциплинированно снимать снимать снимать, несмотря ни на что.
Но, конечно, м…
🎥Зачем разбирать детство с психологом?
В новом ролике рассказываю в каких случаях погружаться в детство действительно необходимо, а в каких не обязательно или даже вредно.
Как понять, какой случай у вас, и что психолог будет делать, если с прошлым все таки придется поработать.
💬А комментариях предлагаю обсудить! Делитесь мыслями и впечатлениями после просмотра и задавайте вопросы.
📺 Смотреть на ютубе
📺 Смотреть …
У меня есть привычка замирать перед каким-то важным, волнительным событием.
А выпуск большого ролика – важное, волнительное событие.
Хочется как бы спрятаться и поставить жизнь на паузу.
И становится сложно, например доставить себя в зал. Но я все равно доставляю🖤
Пошел третий месяц без пропусков тренировок.
📺 Завтра вечером на YouTube и VK Видео выйдет мой большой ролик:
«Зачем разбирать детство с психологом?»
Тема, вокруг которой много мифов.
Одни говорят: «Все проблемы из детства, надо найти травму и всё исправить».
Другие считают: «Зачем копаться в прошлом и искать виноватых? Нужно просто работать над собой здесь и сейчас!».
В ролике разбираю:
• когда действительно не стоит уходить в детство (и почему это иногда…
Все, что связано со съемками видео и монтажом слишком часто идет не по плану.
В этот раз 50 минут исходного материала заснялись с хреновым звуком.
Окей, я расстроилась, но разобралась, как все таки его вытащить. Обрадовалась!
А программа по обработке внезапно решила позависать и дополнительно потрепать мне нервы.
На то, чтоб решить уже это – ушло ещё 6 часов.
Сегодня воевала с вырезкой рилс из длинного ролика.
…
В какой день недели вы больше всего любите смотреть видео на ютубе?
Утром в пн, вт, ср, чт39%
Вечером в пн, вт, ср, чт42%
По утрам на выходных39%
Вечером в воскресенье6%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎥 Ролику «Зачем говорить с психологом про детство?» – быть!
🔥16
Signed Дарья Семихатова
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @semikhatova_psychologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В какой день недели вы больше всего любите смотреть видео на ютубе?
Утром в пн, вт, ср, чт39%
Вечером в пн, вт, ср, чт42%
По утрам на выходных39%
Вечером в воскресенье6%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 499,141 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психолог Дарья Семихатова” (@semikhatova_psychologist), 1,286 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/semikhatova_psychologist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
