Channel
@scu_tweet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,597subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001739525640 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scu_tweet |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scu_tweet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 2,597 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 2,608 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 2,612 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 2,613 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
403 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 123 | 30.5% | |
| 🤣 | 109 | 27.0% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 11.2% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 9.18% | |
| 👎 | 36 | 8.93% | |
| 🎉 | 30 | 7.44% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 5.46% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.248% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خواستم یادآور بشم به بچه های برق ۴۰۴ طبق نظرسنجی ای که انجام شد اگر کسی جلوی تصمیم جمع وایسته و از اونجایی که اسامی کسایی که شرکت میکنن هست فردای روز آزادی هم باید پای تصمیمش وایسته و با تبعات منفیش رو به رو بشه روز آزادی دور نیست پای شرافتتون وایستید #برق۴۰۴ @scu_tweet
🤣48❤17👎3
✌️✌️✌️ #بسیجی_فاکر @scu_tweet
🎉29👎24❤1
File, posted without a caption
اطلاعیه کارزار ایران را پس میگیریم: معرفی پیامرسان کاملا امن «زمزمه» برای حفظ ارتباط با یکدیگر در زمان قطع اینترنت پیامرسان «زمزمه» که توسط گروهی از برنامهنویسان آزادیخواه و مورد اعتماد طراحی و ساخته شده است، در حال حاضر فقط برای تلفنهای اندروید و به صورت فایل APK در دسترس است، و به زودی بر روی گوگلپلی نیز قرار میگیرد. هر چه عده بیشتری این پیامرسان را نصب کنند، کارآیی آن در زمان قطع اینترنت بالاتر خواهد بود…
🤣7❤3
او جوان مُرد، خیلی جوان. اما چیزی هست که نخواهد مُرد و آن رویاهای او است. ویدیو مربوط به جاویدنام عباس دلجویی است.🖤
💔22❤1🎉1
هیچ ایرانی راضی به ویرانی ایران نیست و هیچ ویرانی بزرگتر از ادامه ی جا نیست #بسیجی_فاکر @scu_tweet
👍20👎3🤣2❤1
اولا راجب موضوع پیام قبلی از همه عذر خواهی میکنم من آدمی نیستم که اهل جدایی جنسیتی و اینا باشم و قصد و منظور بدی نداشتم دوما دم همه دوستان گرم خسته نباشید دارید ولی روی صحبتم با عرزشیاس . هوی توله عرزشی این پیامارو دیدی ؟؟ برگرد تو سوراخت پیش رهبر تک دستت چون بچه ها مجازی اینجوری لختتون کردن وای بحالتون اگر حضوری بیوفتین دست من ، کاری میکنم دانشجو های کل جندی شاپور (به قول خودتون چمران) از رو جنازه هاتون رد بشن . قبل…
🤣17👍12👎2
اینم شخصیت کسی که میگه شاهزاده تکامل شخصیت نداره #سودا @scu_tweet
ما همچنان بر تصمیم خود مصمیم و میدان را خالی نمیکنیم همچنان در کلاس ها حضور پیدا نمیکنیم. #پناه @scu_tweet
👍87🤣30❤10👎2
_مدارک تکمیلی در قالب چند اسکرین شات👆 #نفوذی #امیرمحمد_جعفری #رسوایی_جنایت_و_مکافات #راسویاب_چمران @scu_tweet
🔥22👍3🤣2❤1👏1
امیرمحمد (سینا) جعفری یک سایبری و نفوذی در پوست مخالف و برانداز. جعفری با اکانت های "امام زمان" "سینا بازگشت🤣" "سینا 😶🌫️" " 🫣elham" و... یک سایبری بوده که از بدو ورودش به چنل و گپها بخاطر فعایتهایش برای سیاهنمایی پهلویها و سفیدشویی ج.ا، دعوا و فحاشی و تهدیدهای مکرر از جمله در پیوی براندازان زیر ذره بین قرار گرفت. از همان ابتدا با ادای روشنفکری و اهل مطالعه بودن و سعی در تخریب پهلویها، تحقیر مردم و بیسواد خوا…
🔥23❤3🤣3👎2👍1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @scu_tweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 538,607 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توییتر دانشجویان چمران” (@scu_tweet), 2,597 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scu_tweet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.