Channel

ПЕРЕХОДНИК «НЕМЕЗИДА»

@scottpiligrim_conf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

—subscribers

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002013341019
Type	Channel
Username	@scottpiligrim_conf
Created	10 April 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	26 August 2026
Last confirmed live	27 August 2026
Measurements held	0
On Telegram	t.me/scottpiligrim_conf

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 10 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
🤯	2	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2024 to 10 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2024, 18:46 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Forwarded from @C_DNEMESIS

СТАЛИН МОЛЧАЛ, ГИТЛЕР МОЛЧАЛ, НО Я МОЛЧАТЬ НЕ СОБИРАЮСЬ 🚫 Запомните мое имя - Виктор Полевой, я был в тени 17 лет, настало время это исправить. КФКМ - это далеко не скучные каналы и обычные трупы, вы не понимаете насколько это страшно. Земля хранит в себе историю, о которой не принято рассказывать в нынешних школах, обычный человек не знает и половины от того, что происходило на самом деле в прошлом, об это я расск…

🤯2

10 Apr 2024, 18:39 UTCviews —

Channel created

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @scottpiligrim_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

операция «Немезида»
@C_DNEMESIS · 61 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Roleplay confessions
@roleplaycnf · 71 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

операция «Немезида»
@C_DNEMESIS · 61 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“ПЕРЕХОДНИК «НЕМЕЗИДА»” (@scottpiligrim_conf). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scottpiligrim_conf.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.