Channel
@scopulynews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,913subscribers
-56 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001169293829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scopulynews |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scopulynews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 6,913 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 6,934 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 6,949 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 6,969 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 6,969 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,781 |
| Reactions total | 274 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
274 reactions across 39 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 81 | 29.6% | |
| 🔥 | 80 | 29.2% | |
| ❤ | 79 | 28.8% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 8.39% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.365% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔗 Connect to Scopuly from External Stellar dApps Scopuly is now featured inside the Stellar Wallets Kit WalletConnect flow. Users can open a supported Stellar dApp in their browser, select Scopuly, connect through WalletConnect and approve requests securely in Scopuly Mobile. The integration was validated through a real Reown relay session, including: • Native mobile handoff • Wallet pairing • Stellar account app…
❤2👍2🔥2🥰1
🔗 $XLM just found a new route into the XRP Ledger Stellar and XRP Ledger have spent more than a decade evolving on separate paths. Now, they're starting to connect. Xora Finance has enabled native $XLM settlement on XRPL, giving $XLM holders a way to settle their assets within the XRP Ledger ecosystem. And the interesting part isn't just the technical integration. It’s the history. Stellar and XRPL share surpris…
❤3👍2🔥2
⚡ Scopuly Direct Provider: Instant Access for Stellar dApps When a Stellar dApp is opened inside Scopuly Mobile, it can connect directly to the wallet through the injected window.scopuly provider. No QR code. No additional WalletConnect session. No Reown project ID. The new Scopuly module is included in Stellar Wallets Kit’s standard modules and supports much more than basic transaction signing: • Account and net…
❤3👍2🔥2
🌐 What if the future of finance doesn’t run on one blockchain? XRP, $XLM and HBAR are increasingly being positioned for different pieces of the same financial puzzle. Think of it less like a competition - and more like an interconnected system. 💧 XRP Ledger Payments, liquidity and cross-border settlement sit at the center. XRP and RLUSD are designed around moving value, while the ecosystem is expanding into lendin…
❤2👍2🔥2🥰1
🚀 One Scopuly Experience Across the Stellar Ecosystem Two Scopuly connection paths are now merged into Stellar Wallets Kit: 🌐 External dApp → WalletConnect → Scopuly Mobile 📱 In-app dApp → Direct Provider → Scopuly Mobile The next step is the Scopuly Browser Extension. It will bring the same provider experience to desktop Stellar dApps while keeping final approval and signing connected to Scopuly Mobile. Our go…
❤2👍2🔥2🥰1
💫 Stellar $XLM just hit a number that traders might be overlooking 11.1 million transactions in one day. That’s the new high recorded on the Stellar network over the past week. And here’s what makes it interesting: $XLM itself is still sitting around $0.16. No massive price explosion. No crazy retail hype. Just a sharp increase in actual network activity. That puts the spotlight on a different question: What if …
❤2👍2🥰2👌1
Discover Stellar dApps Inside Scopuly 🧭 Finding useful applications should not require searching across dozens of websites. Scopuly includes a dedicated dApps section designed to help users discover products across the Stellar ecosystem. Users can explore available applications, learn what they offer, and access supported connection flows from the wallet experience. A clear dApp directory can make Stellar DeFi mo…
❤2👍2🔥2🥰1
🧩 $XLM MAY BE WAITING FOR ONE FINAL PIECE OF THE PUZZLE. The technology is already here. The institutions are already exploring blockchain. The developers are already building. Tokenized assets are already moving on-chain. So what could unlock the next wave of Stellar $XLM adoption? Regulatory clarity. 🏛 José Fernández, President & Chief Growth Officer at the Stellar Development Foundation, recently highlighted e…
🔥2❤1👍1
Explore Soroswap Through Scopuly 🔄 Soroban is expanding the range of decentralized trading experiences available on Stellar. Scopuly users can discover ecosystem applications such as Soroswap through the dApps section and use supported connection methods. Every contract interaction should be reviewed before approval, including the selected assets, network, contract action, and expected result. A smooth wallet con…
🔥3❤2👍2
🏦 Stellar $XLM may not need another breakthrough. It may need clearer rules. For years, Stellar $XLM has been building the infrastructure financial institutions actually care about: 💸 Global payments 🏛 Asset tokenization 💵 Stablecoins 🔐 Compliance-focused infrastructure 👨💻 A growing developer ecosystem Now the missing piece could be regulatory clarity. José Fernández, President & Chief Growth Officer at the Stel…
❤2👍2🔥2👏1
Scopuly Web Wallet 💻 Sometimes a larger screen is the better place to manage crypto activity. The Scopuly Web Wallet gives users browser-based access to Stellar account tools, assets, trading, liquidity, and integrated exchange flows. It complements the mobile wallet by offering a wider interface for reviewing balances, markets, and active operations. Users should always verify that they are visiting the official…
❤3👍2🔥2
💱 USDC is quietly gaining serious traction on Stellar $XLM . In just 30 days, the amount of USDC on the network jumped 34.7%, reaching roughly 365$ M. That’s not just another stablecoin statistic. It shows that dollar liquidity is increasingly finding its way onto Stellar’s payment rails. And there’s an important reason behind it: 🌐 Circle’s CCTP now connects Stellar with 23 blockchains. USDC can move between n…
❤2👍2🔥2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @scopulynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,085,139 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scopuly - Stellar DeFi” (@scopulynews), 6,913 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scopulynews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.