Video message, posted without a caption
❤4

Channel
@sasharobinson
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,031subscribers
+837 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001220489223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sasharobinson |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sasharobinson |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 19,031 | +5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 19,026 | +4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 19,022 | +4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 19,018 | +14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 19,004 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 19,011 | +9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:11 | 19,002 | +40 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 18,962 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:08 | 18,965 | -7 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 18,972 | -3 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 18,975 | +5 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 18,970 | +45 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 18,925 | +44 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 18,881 | +29 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 18,852 | +25 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 18,827 | +19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 18,808 | +19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 18,789 | +20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 18,769 | +73 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 18,696 | first reading |
134 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 134 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,277 reactions across 127 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,136 | 49.9% | |
| 🔥 | 690 | 30.3% | |
| 👍 | 174 | 7.64% | |
| 👏 | 55 | 2.42% | |
| 💯 | 46 | 2.02% | |
| ❤🔥 | 44 | 1.93% | |
| 🎉 | 27 | 1.19% | |
| 🤩 | 18 | 0.791% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 0.791% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 0.615% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 0.527% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 0.483% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 0.439% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 0.264% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.264% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.132% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.044% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.044% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.044% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.044% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.132% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,277 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sasharobinson. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 134 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
Рилс-миллионник художника 🔥 Это ролик художницы и выпускницы нашей школы Яны Черепанской из запрещенной сети, который принес ей 15 000 подписчиков и узнаваемость. О самой Яне рассказали - здесь Напоминаем, что Яна придёт к нам в гости в эту пятницу 4 сентября на прямой эфир и поделится тем самым секретным ингредиентом продающих творцов. 👉 Встречаемся в этом канале или ВКонтакте. 🔴 Не пропустите начало в 18:00 мск
❤8🔥4
Про продажи 🔝 и где я продала свои 3 работы, и про бордовые лакированные сапоги 😂😅 для Cosmoscow 🔥😵💫
🤣8🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤18🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤16🔥5
Арабский принц купил сразу 12 работ 🔥 И вернулся за 13-й❗️ ⏰ 4 сентября в 18:00 мск зовем всех в наш телеграм-канал на эфир с выпускницей, художницей Яной Черепанской. ✍️ Яна живет в Московской области, пришла к нам на обучение в 2022 году художником с одной галереей, которая не приносила продаж. Была куча идей и полное отсутствие системы. За время обучения она поменяля смысловую стилистику своих работ — то, что о…
🔥15❤13🤩2
🍁 Сентябрь решает, сколько картин ты продашь до Нового года 🤫 Дочитай - в конце подарок! Сезон продаж арта стартовал. У меня для вас целый месяц разборов и эфиров, чтобы эта осень стала самой результативной. 🔥 4 сентября, 18:00 мск — эфир с выпускницей Яной Черепанской. Художница из Подмосковья за август продала 17 работ в РФ и за рубеж. Заберёте рабочую схему регулярных продаж. 🔥 10 сентября, 19:00 мск — новый м…
❤13🔥5
И снова отличные новости из чата выпускников ☝️ Наша выпускница, художница из России Анна Пронько зашла со своими невероятными работами на Арт Мост 🔥🔥🔥 Поздравляем и желаем скорейших продаж в преддверии большого сезона 👏
❤15🔥4🥰1
ЛЕТО - МЕРТВЫЙ СЕЗОН⁉️ в этом году у меня и многих моих учеников ЛЕТО прошло на ура!🎉 Столько сообщений в чате выпускников было этим летом с продажами❗️ Я вот думаю, если лето выдалось таким урожайным, что же будет осенью-зимой, когда интерес к искусству достигнет сезонного пика ⁉️💵💵💵 Мы с командой готовим много активностей, чтобы ваш сезон тоже стал самым прибыльным. Подробности скоро 🔜
🔥18❤2
Не устаю благодарить своё любимое дело за возможность жить так, как хочется и быть рядом с самыми важными для меня людьми 🍁 ❤️
❤41🔥11💯6
📆 🍂 Первое сентября — день, когда пахнет цветами, новыми тетрадками и новой жизнью Для детей это волнительно и непонятно. Они еще не знают, зачем им все эти уроки и домашние задания. Они смотрят на взрослых и думают: «Вот у них точно свобода». Но мы-то знаем, что свобода — это не отсутствие обязанностей. Это возможность выбирать. Когда у тебя есть знания, ты можешь выбирать профессию, которая откликается. Можешь н…
❤23🔥9👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @sasharobinson. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@sasharobinson edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Те кто ответили "хочу", скажите пожалуйста, что вас останавливает от участия в выставке?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Участвовали вы ранее в выставках?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Саша Робинсон Творчество Продвижение” (@sasharobinson), 19,031 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sasharobinson.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.